Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Any Updates On B6? FLL-ISP/EWR?  
User currently offlineIslipWN From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (9 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 2345 times:

Are there any updates about the FLL-ISP/EWR that B6 was going to start in 2005? I remember there was 1 or 2 threads, but no one knew the real deal.


Joe

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJBLUA320 From United States of America, joined May 2002, 3179 posts, RR: 19
Reply 1, posted (9 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2328 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

More fiction than fact, and interesting but unlikely reading material if anything else. Newark is quite full right now, and while Islip has the space, I think they'd be wanting Newark first.

I think they are concentrating on Chicago right now and trying to work some deals out.

JBLU


User currently offlineNjdevilsin03 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 728 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2257 times:

Would they dare enter CO country? That's one of the most single airline controlled airport's in the US. Didn't DL force B6 out of ATL, even if B6 did start up service there it might wind up being exactly what happened in ATL.


717, 727, 731, 732, 733, 734, 735, 73G, 738, 752, 753, 762, 763, 777, DC9, MD80, DC10, L1011, ERJ, CRJ, ATR, DH8, A300,
User currently offlineFlairport From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (9 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2236 times:

back to ATL again, eh! Might I remind you that B6 just chose the wrong cities out of ATL. If they had chosen FLL and JFK it would have been much more sucessful. And I'm not saying it becasue when I fly it usually involves ATL, FLL, and NYC!

However, at the time LGB was their target and their situation was different. I am pretty sure that they would try FLL and JFK if they could get the opportunity again in the future...those would be the 2 I would guess on if they went into ATL tomorrow.

I remember when B6 came into ATL. It looked real funny on their route map! But I remember seeing a little bus stop ad for jetBlue on Roswell Road in Cobb County (near Johnson Ferry for those familiar with the area). Neeleman also came to town a few times and they tried to get a lot of publicity in local papers by giving tickets to the needy etc... I was one of the few people in Atlanta who had even heard of jetBlue and if they had flown where I needed to go I would have flown them. (I actually credit myself with them coming to ATL...I baught 2 shirts from them online in 2001...prior to their arrival in ATL.)

[Edited 2004-12-13 04:41:18]

User currently offlineCory6188 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2686 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (9 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2212 times:

One minor problem about B6 entering EWR - a total lack of space.

Terminal A is filled with all of the US domestic carriers except for CO, although CO has 6 gates in A for flights to ORD, DFW, and ATL that they grabbed just to keep new airlines out. TZ and AS share one gate already - there is simply no space there.

Terminal B has all of the international airlines plus NW and DL - there is no room for anyone else there - the gates are highly utilized as it is.

Terminal C is CO's personalized terminal - everything is customed for them (gate agent desks, checkin counters, even the access roadways are split for international and domestic flights on CO). CO wouldn't give up space in C in a million years - especially not to B6 or any other LCC.


User currently offlineFlairport From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 2130 times:

you must remember though, that B6 would probably operate a couple of flights per day...I'm sure they could find a gate to share...

User currently offlineRlwynn From Germany, joined Dec 2000, 1086 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (9 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2117 times:

I was thinking about this overnight and came to the conclusion that it could easily work for JetBlue.

They could for a very good price acquire newer 300-600s and give them the JetBlue makeover. They would carry 280 passengers across the pond for very little money accounting for the planes efficiency and the low acquisition cost. If people like the 320 they would equally like the 300. There is absolutely no reason for 330s or 340s across the Atlantic from the east coast.

If they really wanted to they could effectively



I can drive faster than you
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Any Updates On 9W To EWR? posted Fri Dec 16 2005 17:08:27 by Abrelosojos
Any Updates On That Nonstop Boston-Asia Service? posted Thu Sep 21 2006 14:53:34 by ChrisNH
Any Updates On The New Air NZ Colours? posted Sat Jul 8 2006 09:53:43 by KiwiTEAL
Any Updates On A380? posted Fri Jan 20 2006 02:31:17 by SunriseValley
Any Updates On The Status/loaction Of TMA Fleet? posted Fri Oct 7 2005 18:11:27 by B727
Are There Any Updates On Tarom's A318 Order? posted Thu Jun 16 2005 18:56:11 by Vio
Any Updates On EK Or QR Svcs To The BeNeLux? posted Sat May 28 2005 13:27:05 by QM001
Any Updates On UA's Ditching Of Awac? posted Tue May 10 2005 03:42:18 by ERJ145LR
Any Updates On AC's Status? posted Tue Apr 6 2004 20:31:36 by YVRtoYYZ
ANy Updates On Directv On F9's 318s posted Tue Feb 24 2004 17:15:52 by Diatraveler