Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Lockheed Questions  
User currently offlineCO737800 From Canada, joined Dec 2003, 545 posts, RR: 1
Posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1315 times:

Lots of people think the L1011 is a great aircraft, so my question is why did Lockheed not build a smaller plane like the 737/MD80 size?

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRamerinianair From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 1486 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1306 times:

I believe for them, the L-1011 was not that profitable. A beautiful a/c yes but profitable, not too sure.
At the same time, there were many other competing a/c. The decided to go into the more lucrative military a/c industry instead.
SR



W N = my Worst Nightmare!!!!!
User currently offlineCO737800 From Canada, joined Dec 2003, 545 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1281 times:

If Lockheed had a smaller 737 type they might have had more orders cause many airlines like to have a family of aircraft. Boeing had the 747,737,727 Douglas had the DC-10 and the DC-9's

User currently offlineZippyjet From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 5478 posts, RR: 13
Reply 3, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1277 times:

The 1970's spelled bad luck for Rolls Royce and Lockheed. There was a whole legal and financial affair which is convoluted and out of my field of expertise. The writing was on the wall for Lockheed at least for commercial aviation. It seems as if Lockheed had bad luck and or bad timing starting back in the 1950's when they put all their eggs in the nest of a bird which was the turbo prop Lockheed Electra L188. Meanwhile Douglass, Boeing and the smaller tier companies Sud, Convair etc. flew into the pure jet age. Lockheed went from the anachronistic Electra straight to the wide body L1011 Tri-Star. Due to all the legal and money stuff of the late 60's and early 70's, they got delayed rolling out the L1011. And Douglass flew right to the head of the three engined wide body class with their DC 10. And then along comes the Airbus invasion and as they say the rest is history. BTW, American Airlines approached Lockheed requesting a wide body efficient jet that would serve their ORD LAX lucrative routes. American ended up with the DC 10 due to all the delays.


I'm Zippyjet & I approve of this message!
User currently offlineClassicLover From Ireland, joined Mar 2004, 4627 posts, RR: 23
Reply 4, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 1266 times:

It is a shame, as it's generally considered that the Lockheed product is the better product from a technical point of view.

Rolls-Royce actually went bankrupt developing the RB211, and the British government had to bail them out. I've read stories where the L1011 was sold at below cost to make the sale, pushing out the breakeven figure even more. It was originally 250 frames, and they sold 250 frames, but the discounting meant they'd have to sell more to break even.

It is a shame, the L1011 is a beautiful aircraft.

I thought the Lockheed Electra was a successful aircraft? It was turboprop, not piston, and sold well around the world. I will admit that it is strange that Lockheed went down that road, rather than straight to pure jet...

Trent.



I do quite enjoy a spot of flying - more so when it's not in Economy!
User currently offlineZippyjet From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 5478 posts, RR: 13
Reply 5, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 1254 times:

"I thought the Lockheed Electra was a successful aircraft? It was turboprop, not piston, and sold well around the world. I will admit that it is strange that Lockheed went down that road, rather than straight to pure jet...

Trent."


It was eventually successful and extremely reliable but, a structural design flaw in the engine nacelles caused several fatal accidents early in the plane's run. Once Lockhead rectified this situation it proved itself. Timing was wrong for this turbo-prop. Had it come on the scene 5 years earlier 1954 instead of 1959 then it would have been one of the classic airliner success stories. It would have whipped the tail of the ugly duckling ovoid themed slower Vicers Viscount turbo prop which was not much faster than the DC 7 and Super G Constellation. Eastern Airlines led by Eddy Richenbocker along with the powers to be at Lockhead felt the switch to pure jets would be a much more gradual change and, turbo props would be the thing of the day for several years. Lockhead however rolled out a successful biz jet that was even featured in the classic James Bond movie Goldfinger starring Sean Connery as James Bond 007.  Big thumbs up

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ellis M. Chernoff


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © John F. Ciesla


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ian Howat



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Joe Fernandez - Aviation Photography of Miami


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Allan Rossmore




I'm Zippyjet & I approve of this message!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Lockheed Jet Star Questions? posted Sun Nov 21 2004 12:44:02 by Zippyjet
Questions About Current Status Of Air Zimbabwe posted Wed Dec 20 2006 02:59:15 by Planenutz
Delta Airlines Lockheed L100 Hercules posted Sat Dec 16 2006 23:46:45 by Columba
AA & LAN Routes MIA-SCL Questions... posted Sat Dec 16 2006 20:14:49 by TUNisia
Questions About Air Nostrum posted Sat Dec 9 2006 13:51:40 by Reifel
CDG-MAA R/t Inside IND-CDG R/t Questions posted Fri Dec 8 2006 19:57:18 by Chase
747 Production Line Schedule Questions posted Fri Dec 8 2006 03:37:30 by CX747
Security Questions At Check-in - WHY? posted Wed Dec 6 2006 23:21:56 by FCAFLYBOY
Will Lockheed Build Biz-Jets Again? posted Sun Dec 3 2006 21:30:27 by KSUpilot
Important Assighnment Questions -HELP Plzz posted Thu Nov 30 2006 06:58:07 by Fiaz