Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Southwest B732 Retired Yet?  
User currently offlineDelta07 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 96 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 2093 times:

I had heard that WN was retiring the remainder of their B732's during the month of January 2005. I was wondering if there still any flying. I've been tracking random flights during the day for a couple days now and I've not seen any B732 aircraft listed.

If any of you Southwest Spirit folks out there can shed some light I would appreciate it. Thanks so much  Smile



NO URLS in signature
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSWAFA30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 2043 times:

I believe there are 5 -200s left in the fleet. The last one is scheduled to be retired January 17, 2005.

User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2027 times:

There are indeed five left, and more details about their last couple of weeks in operation can be found at:

http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/1880448/


User currently offlineNtspelich From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 764 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1955 times:

Monday, 1/17/05 will mark the final flight of N95SW. I'm not sure if that's the final -200 flight, but it's the day that we, as a company, are celebrating the end of our -200s years of faithful service. I still say that we should convert them to cargo and bounce them around the system to move mail/freight.

NTS



United 717 heavy, you're facing the wrong way. Any chance you can powerback to get off of my deice pad?
User currently offlineOurboeing From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 475 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1945 times:

And I was under the wrong impression that they are flying none of the 200s or 300s anymore. I flew from MCO to BWI this morning on "Arizona One" and it is a 737-300 series. But you know what, if they are in good shape..why not. "Arizona One" looks an flies as good as any 737NG.

Afterall its a BOEING

Cheers..

OURBOEING


User currently offlineNtspelich From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 764 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1941 times:

The -300s will be with us for awhile. A long while.  Smile

NTS



United 717 heavy, you're facing the wrong way. Any chance you can powerback to get off of my deice pad?
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 1941 times:

>>>I still say that we should convert them to cargo and bounce them around the system to move mail/freight.

We'd still end up having hour/cycle issues, plus no HUD/HGS...

Better idea: Take all the -500s, strip them down to 56 seats, fly them everywhere out of DAL now, without waiting for the Wright Amendment to be rescinded, and use all that extra bin space to move a good amount of the mail/freight around the system....

Plus, you'd have the power of a -500, the quiet of a -500, and the ability to use HUD/HGS to make it into foggy places...

I can dream, can't I...?  Big grin



User currently offlineNtspelich From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 764 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 1934 times:

yada yada yada.....I can dream, can't I...?

There's a reason that you're at HQ in DAL and I'm out on the ramp at BWI.  Big grin

[Edited 2005-01-01 06:59:32]


United 717 heavy, you're facing the wrong way. Any chance you can powerback to get off of my deice pad?
User currently offlineSWAFA30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1903 times:

Better idea: Take all the -500s, strip them down to 56 seats, fly them everywhere out of DAL now, without waiting for the Wright Amendment to be rescinded, and use all that extra bin space to move a good amount of the mail/freight around the system....

Plus, you'd have the power of a -500, the quiet of a -500, and the ability to use HUD/HGS to make it into foggy places...


Interesting idea...although yanking 66 seats out of a -500 could cause slight CASM issues. I do like the idea of a 1:19 F/A-Pax ratio...even if they only put two of us onboard that's 1:28....do have any idea how much reading I could get done??  Wink/being sarcastic


User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4737 posts, RR: 26
Reply 9, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1815 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

And I was under the wrong impression that they are flying none of the 200s or 300s anymore. I flew from MCO to BWI this morning on "Arizona One" and it is a 737-300 series. But you know what, if they are in good shape..why not. "Arizona One" looks an flies as good as any 737NG.

Afterall its a BOEING

Cheers..

OURBOEING


Wow...where did you develop that impression? We have a lot of -300s and they will be around for a long time. I want to say about half, or close to half the fleet consists of -300s. There has to be close to 200 of them. I don't have the exact numbers, but yeah I think after the -200s are gone, we will have about 417 aircraft. I know we got up to 420, but the number has gone down, or is going down as the -200s are being retired faster than the new -700 deliveries are coming. I'm sure OPNLguy has the numbers and wouldn't mind sharing.  Big grin

It does depend what station you are talking about, but at SJC the ratio of -300s to -700s has to be around 50/50. But I've heard many stations say they mainly see -700s. SNA is an example of a city that only sees -700s.

[Edited 2005-01-02 04:24:35]


ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 1789 times:

We ended the year with 417 aircraft, so taking the 5 remaining -200s and the 25 -500s off, that leaves us with 387 (-300s and -700s) and since we have 194 -300s, that means we have 193 -700s. With the first -700 deliveries in January (starting with N200WN), we'll be exactly 50/50, and the -700 fleet will get bigger from there.

N200WN will also be the first -700 delivered to us without "eyebrow" windows...


User currently offlineGreenguy01 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 235 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 1774 times:

OPNLguy...

Do you know the reasoning behind N200WN being delivered without the eyebrow windows?



Never argue with an idiot. They drag you to their level and beat you with experience.
User currently offlineLuv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12090 posts, RR: 50
Reply 12, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 1768 times:

I would say the same reason that the 717's that are coming off line with out the eye brow windows, FAA has ok'd it, and it is a cost savings.


You can cut the irony with a knife
User currently offlineAv8trxx From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 657 posts, RR: 6
Reply 13, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 1773 times:

"Do you know the reasoning behind N200WN being delivered without the eyebrow windows?"

The rumblings I have heard are that 1) yes, they are a cost savings by not having them and 2) since the major function of these windows was to increase the pilots outside visibility to spot traffic, they aren't as necessary with TCAS. So, they might as well save the bucks.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Has DL Ship 102 Retired Yet? posted Thu Dec 8 2005 03:00:24 by OttoPylit
Are Iberia's 747-200's Retired Yet? posted Thu Oct 14 2004 19:10:50 by MADtoCAE
DC9-10 No Retired Yet posted Wed Oct 3 2001 17:27:54 by Nwa747-400
Dine Aboard Retired Southwest 737 posted Sun Oct 9 2005 19:47:11 by FlyingTexan
Why No Changes On Southwest's -500's Yet? posted Wed Apr 10 2002 05:26:13 by SEA nw DC10
Has Southwest's New Livery Won You Over Yet? posted Mon May 14 2001 10:54:21 by LAX
Southwest 7194 RNO-CAK posted Sun Jun 17 2007 14:35:04 by AS739X
Doing Bad When Southwest 'DING's' Your City? posted Thu Jun 14 2007 21:22:46 by ChrisNH
Status Of Southwest Leather Seat Upgrades? posted Wed Jun 13 2007 20:09:16 by AA737-823
Compass Airlines- Livery Out Yet? posted Sun Jun 10 2007 06:10:44 by RJ777