Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
DL MD-88 Accident In DEN 4-03  
User currently offlineRyanL1011 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 3009 times:

I was browsing through the pictures and found this one which indicates a Delta MD-88 with damage during pushback in Denver in April of 2003. Anyone have any info on this? As a former Ramp Agent for Delta in DEN I of course am interested.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jarett Sirko



16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCactus739 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2381 posts, RR: 33
Reply 1, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 2989 times:

This is the NTSB's report on the incident:

http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20030501X00608&key=1


You can't fix stupid.... - Ron White
User currently offlineB4real From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2595 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 2973 times:

Here's the NTSB report links:

Current Synopsis [Probable Cause]
http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20030501X00608&key=1

Factual PDF
http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/GenPDF.asp?id=DEN03FA070&rpt=fa

For future searches of the NTSB database, you can go directly here:

http://www.airsafe.com/events/usrecord.htm
B4REAL


B4REAL, spelled like it sounds
User currently offlineB4real From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2595 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 2970 times:

You're quick Cactus739  Smile


B4REAL, spelled like it sounds
User currently offlineCactus739 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2381 posts, RR: 33
Reply 4, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 2961 times:

The advantage of being at work with absolutely nothing to do.  Smile




You can't fix stupid.... - Ron White
User currently offlineRyanL1011 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2892 times:

Thanks for the info. I wonder how long this ship was out of service for.

User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2889 times:

I remember that picture...

Someone wondered what that orange part on the back of the aircraft was, and it actually was only one of these http://www.wctproducts.com/delineator_post_page.htm on the ground behind the aircraft...

User currently offlineSeptember11 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 3623 posts, RR: 23
Reply 7, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 2777 times:

unfortunate incident...

similar incident involving a Continental M80 @ EWR


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Juan C. Silva
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Joe Pries - A.T. TEAM





Airliners.net of the Future
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 2760 times:

>>>similar incident involving a Continental M80 @ EWR

Just curious, but how are a pushback tug hitting an aircraft, and an aircraft driving into a building "similar?"  Big grin

User currently offlineCactus739 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2381 posts, RR: 33
Reply 9, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 2730 times:

I was wondering that same thing.

The CO incident was a mechanic doing an engine run up test with the parking break set....(if I remember right).




You can't fix stupid.... - Ron White
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2676 times:

The COA EWR thing came up recently, but in a nutshell, overnight MX was done on something on/near the throttle quadrant and the thrust levers were moved out of their normal idle thrust position. When this work was done, they were never returned the thrust levers to their normal idle thrust position. A second mechanic was working on an engine later, and when done, had to accomplish an engine run for leak checks or whatever. He started the engine, not noticing the out-of-position thrust levers, and when fuel came in and the engine lit off, the aircraft jumped the chocks and went into the building. One other fellow who was at EWR chimed in that he'd heard that the mechanic was kneeling over the throttle quadrant to run the engine, and wasn't in the seat itself, and thus unable to even apply the brakes.

Heck of a waste of a good aircraft, which was written off...

User currently offline242 From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 498 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2492 times:

Just curious, but how are a pushback tug hitting an aircraft, and an aircraft driving into a building "similar?"

They both were the result of the engines being started with the power levers -not- in the idle position. The MD-88 moved forward enough to jack-knife the pushback tug.

User currently offlineRyanL1011 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2324 times:

I can tell you that the push back tugs delta had in DEN as of the late 90s were 3 VERY heavy Tugs, 2 were old and 1 wasn't all that old, but none the less that had to have been some serious power to move that Tug like that. And a MD-88 at that! I know the JT8Ds are good engines but my gosh! I would think that the towbar would have bent in half before getting the tug to jackknife. I am very glad that no one was injured in particular the ramp crew, I can just picture myself disconnecting the towbar from the front wheels and then having the aircraft move forward like that. Would have scared the heck out of me!

User currently offlineDAirbus From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 587 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2206 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Something similar happened when I worked for DL in BWI a couple of years back. It was wintertime and the ramp had several patches of ice and packed snow due to a recent snowstorm. We had a 727 with an inop APU which needed an airstart. The Captain requested to start all three engines at the gate instead of starting one or two and then using the crossbleeds to start the remaining engines. We advised against it because of the icy ramp and the fact that three operating JT8's have a considerable amount of thrust even at idle. Also, the pushback we had at the time was pretty old and had trouble pushing back aircraft even during good weather conditions.

During pushback, with the tug and towbar at about a 45 degree angle to the aircraft, the airplane started rolling forward. The pushback driver tried to straighten the towbar but the tug did not have enough traction on the icy ramp and the plane was actually pushing the tug sideways. The headset cord snapped and and one of the ground agents tried to give the "set brakes" signal to the crew, but apparently they were busy with a checklist and not paying attention. As the airplane rolled forward it bent the towbar about 90 degrees and finally came to a stop when the plane hit the corner of the pushback cab puncturing the fuselage.

Fortunately no one was hurt but the flight was cancelled and the aircraft was grounded for about a day while a temporary repair was made to get it back to Atlanta. I don't know the details of the investigation but I believe the crew was found to be at least partly at fault for not paying attention to hand signals from the ground crew.




"I love mankind. It's people I can't stand." - Charles Shultz
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31228 posts, RR: 58
Reply 14, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 2153 times:

They both were the result of the engines being started with the power levers -not- in the idle position. The MD-88 moved forward enough to jack-knife the pushback tug.

What about the Chocks.
regds
MEL


Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineAir2gxs From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 2130 times:

I've seen aircraft jump chocks before while under power.

User currently offline242 From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 498 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2040 times:

What about the Chocks?

The aircraft was in the process of being pushed back at the time.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
DL MD-88 Accident In 1996 posted Wed Mar 15 2006 19:00:49 by Lindy
DL MD-88..Loud Bang...loss Of Pressurization posted Wed May 18 2005 19:07:18 by Delta07
MD-88 Noise In The Cabin posted Sun Apr 24 2005 22:16:14 by DC10Heavy
DL MD-88's.....how Long Till There Outta Here? posted Mon Apr 5 2004 06:47:06 by DeltaRampPIT
AR MD-88's Still In Europe? posted Sat Apr 12 2003 06:39:52 by 717fan
DL MD-88 Questions posted Sun Jul 14 2002 21:43:51 by Flight Level
DL Business Class On MD-88? posted Sat May 27 2006 02:33:31 by Jhooper
Difference In Smoothness Between 767 And MD-88? posted Mon Feb 13 2006 23:55:49 by Bucks918
DL To Start MD-88 Service To PHF On January 31 posted Sun Jan 2 2005 23:31:36 by IslipWN
Delta MD-88 Off The Runway In PNS posted Sat Jan 3 2004 05:03:45 by Groundstop