Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Only Hand Baggage  
User currently offlineSpantax From Belgium, joined Nov 2004, 323 posts, RR: 1
Posted (9 years 8 months 13 hours ago) and read 2232 times:

Hello. I was wondering: What if the idea of Ryanair of banning all checked baggage and allowing only hand-baggage was to become radically real? Should planes be converted structurally in order to let the passengers to put by themselves their own baggage in the hold (as it is the case on trains) by adding, for instance, an internal stair?. Could then a portion of the hold be used for other purposes (galley, toilet, etc)? Would this mean cheaper fares as you could avoid ramp agents, increase the number of flights per day, increase MTOW and so on?

("In another move, Ryanair says it plans to ban heavy luggage on its flights. It will persuade passengers to travel light by taking only hand baggage. This will be "encouraged" through a system of penalties. Michael O'Leary, Ryanair's chief executive, told The Times newspaper that over the next three years luggage allowances would be tightened to persuade fliers to pack more carefully. The airline has already reduced the allowance for checked in baggage from 20kg to 15kg and more than doubled its charges for excess. Within 18 months, it plans to impose charges for baggage stowed in the aircraft hold. As an incentive, passengers who take only hand luggage could receive a refund on the cost of their ticket". CNN.com, Sunday, July 25, 2004)



A300.10.19.20.21.30.40,AN26,ATR42,AVR146,B717.27.37.47.57.77,B1900,C130,C212,CH47,CRJ200.700,DC9,DHC4,ERJ135.190,F27
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGilesdavies From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 3014 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (9 years 8 months 12 hours ago) and read 2216 times:

This is already reality...

At Girona and LGW a few weeks ago there baggage handler strikes at both airports and instead of cancelling the flights like many operators, FR chose to operate the flights with hand luggage only.

They didn't give passengers the option of rebooking onto another flight and just put on their website that these flights would be operating normally with just hand baggage. If passengers turned up at the airport with luggage over and above the 10kg limit it would be down to them to ensure their luggage got to the destination at their own expense.




User currently offlineKateAA From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 89 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (9 years 8 months 10 hours ago) and read 2143 times:

Yet another reason into why you dont fly RyanAir.

Kate


User currently offlineCkfred From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 5222 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (9 years 8 months 9 hours ago) and read 2102 times:

If RyanAir really wants to eliminate checked baggage, then will they seek to increase their cargo business? The reason that more U.S. carriers haven't gone into bankruptcy is that they carry so much cargo, including mail, flowers, fresh fish, etc.

Flying cargo is very lucrative, but it also involves a lot of expenses, including cargo facilities, infrastructure to track cargo, etc.


User currently offlineAa777jr From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 8 months 9 hours ago) and read 2080 times:

I wish all majors in the US would ban carry-on luggage, its such a pain in the bum, even sitting in F class, waiting for people to store, move, retrieve, etc their damn luggage from overheads.



User currently offlineAloges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8705 posts, RR: 43
Reply 5, posted (9 years 8 months 8 hours ago) and read 2064 times:

"I wish all majors in the US would ban carry-on luggage, its such a pain in the bum, even sitting in F class, waiting for people to store, move, retrieve, etc their damn luggage from overheads."

Really? A dozen people demanding access to their baggage in the hold because they "forgot this thing I can't be without" sure would make things a lot smoother.  Big grin



Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlineSabena332 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (9 years 8 months 8 hours ago) and read 2024 times:

I wish all majors in the US would ban carry-on luggage, its such a pain in the bum, even sitting in F class, waiting for people to store, move, retrieve, etc their damn luggage from overheads.

Are you kidding? I always try to travel with carry-on luggage only because I hate it to wait at the baggage claim and I can be sure that my luggage don't get lost.

I have the same carry-on trolley like in the picture below:



It is perfect for short trips and I need around 5 seconds to place it together with my jacket in the overhead bin.

I agree however that some people need endless time to place their stuff in the overhead bins, this can be annyoing sometimes.

Patrick


User currently offlineKateAA From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 89 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (9 years 8 months 8 hours ago) and read 2024 times:

Banning carry on, now that's an idea, maybe it will catch on!?

I think that we need to reduce the size of carrys though, sometimes they are so heavy the pax can hardly light them high enough to fit into the lockers.

Quite often if they cant fit them into the over head lockers will either wonder up and down the cabin looking for space or even take other peoples luggage out of the locker to fit there's in! This happens quite often.

Passengers seem to be afraid that if they give their carry on to the crew member will put it in the hold and they will never see it again (which ok, that sometimes happens but not that often!).

Banning carry ons, please!!! But it wont happen!

Kate


User currently offlinePrebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 6431 posts, RR: 54
Reply 8, posted (9 years 8 months 8 hours ago) and read 2019 times:

AA777jr: I wish all majors in the US would ban carry-on luggage....

Dear AA, carry-on will be reduced dramatically the day airlines begin the end of smashing our checked baggage and begin the end of misdirecting it.

When some day that becomes reality, then the airlines will also get a lot of more customers who won't bother to make day long trips on the train or their car only to save the baggage. It may even save them from going bust.

Forty years ago a Danish poet wrote the following lines:
We live in a fantastic world.
In just two hours we can be in London.
After eight more hours we can be in New York.
And in twenty hours our baggage can be in Tokyo.

After Wilbur Wright's famous flight in 1903 his baggage could not be located. The airlines still haven't recovered from that incident.



Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs, Preben Norholm
User currently offlineXkorpyoh From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 819 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (9 years 8 months 8 hours ago) and read 1998 times:

on the contrary....airlines, specially in the UK, should relax their carry-on rules. In the US you get your roller bag (the ones approved for carry on by airlines) on any flight without a problem. In the UK/Europe/Asia, they always give you such a hard time with the size and weight. My bag is just the same size as the one used by FA and I never over pack, but in London, you have to check it in. I had an argument with a BMI agent at the London Express PAddington station counter who forced me to check the bag. I told her that because I was not at the airport i dindt trust their transfer system from the station to the airport to the plane and that she could give the tag and put it in the bag and that i was going to give to an agent at the counter at Heathrow. Once at the airport, i pulled the tag, I took my bag through security and into the plane with not problems. It fit perfectly in the overhead with room to spare and nobody even paid attention...because it was not oversized!

at HKG, the airport, not the airlines, is the one enforcing the carry-on rules. I wonder why? ..they had their militia, a group of 3 or 4, by each security area just looking at carry-on bags. They turn you around to check in your bag if they consider it too big. Waste of time and resources!

-So why are they so strict in Europe and Asia with those carry-ons?

I used to work in baggage services for an airline and i know what a nightmare it is from both sides, the airline and the pax.

My logic is that the Uk/european airlines would save a lot of man power, money and headaches if they allow more carry-ons, at the size and weight allowed inthe US, on all those flights. What is the reasoning of 5KG carry on? I am against oversized bags that dont fit in the overhead compartment, but most roller bags fit perfectly. When I flew ryannair and bmibaby, i had to check it in. I had to put all my valuables in my cargo pants pockets..that is ridiculous.
Continental, on the other hand, expanded the overhead compartments long time ago to better accomodate their paxs..that is the way to go.



User currently offlineGeoffm From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 2111 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (9 years 8 months 6 hours ago) and read 1937 times:

Xkorpyoh, next time somebody "accidently" drops a 10kg bag on your head while trying to squash it into an already overcrowded overhead locker, then you'll realise why it's good some airlines have a lower limit - for health and safety reasons if nothing else.

Here's a short list:
CO, BA, AA - 18kg
CX - 15kg (10kg biz, 7kg economy)
BMI - 12kg max per piece, 23kg max total (12kg/16kg for economy)
VS - 8kg per piece, 16kg max total (6kg/6kg for economy)
AF - 12kg
EK - 12kg (7kg economy)
KL - 10kg
LH - 8kg
QF - 7kg

(all from the relevant airline's website)

Geoff M.
Edited to add CX and EK

[Edited 2005-01-03 22:30:49]

User currently offlineAerofan From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 1517 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (9 years 8 months 6 hours ago) and read 1934 times:

I don't think banning carry on is the best solution. A better solution would be enforcing the one carryon perperson and size and weight restriction regulations. I'm always amazed then pissed at pax who carryon 2 and 3 pieces leaving no room for someone who plays by the rules. Then putting their crap over your head.





Top Of Page | Forum


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
FR: Hand Baggage Only At Gatwick Airport posted Thu Oct 7 2004 14:58:14 by Soups
UK -> USA Hand Baggage Rules (VS) posted Sun Mar 11 2007 15:00:42 by Swiftski
New Hand Baggage Restrictions posted Thu Sep 21 2006 17:44:57 by Cusaeng
UK: Hand Baggage Rules To Change (again) posted Thu Sep 14 2006 00:55:26 by BMIFlyer
Hand Baggage Situation - Flying To The UK posted Thu Aug 24 2006 15:36:02 by AirWales
No Hand Baggage On UK Originating Flights posted Thu Aug 10 2006 09:24:24 by UA935
EasyJets New Hand Baggage Allowance Policy... posted Tue Jul 6 2004 01:16:13 by Gilesdavies
Laptop And/or Hand Baggage Policy - VS posted Wed Jul 2 2003 17:13:20 by VgnAtl747
64kg+ Hand Baggage In Y, Transatlantic, Why? posted Tue Mar 4 2003 09:04:53 by Ammunition
News From Colombia. AV Cargo Only Flights Included posted Fri Mar 9 2007 21:14:29 by Summa767