Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Is VS Not In An Alliance?  
User currently offlineCatatonic From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 1155 posts, RR: 3
Posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 5520 times:

From what I have seen BA and BMI do well from being in an alliance with oneworld and star alliance especially on internal feeder flights. Why isn't Virgin in any sort of alliance? Maybe they could look at skyteam? Surely being in an alliance is more beneficial than not?


Equally Cursed and Blessed.
32 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineStar_member From Australia, joined Dec 2000, 185 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 5483 times:

the best alliance for VS is star. they have a complementary network with BD and already code share. DJ in australia will need to increase their service levels soon to stop the loss of market share to QF and Jetstar, so they would be useful for star also.

User currently offlineQuestAir From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 367 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 5459 times:

I agree; Star is the best fit for VS. As Star_member pointed out, they could hook up with BD to take on BA. Don't they have a solid relationship with SQ as well?


'Do we carry rich people on our flights? Yes, I flew on one this morning and I�m very rich.' - Michael O'Leary
User currently offlineAerofan From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 1517 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 5406 times:

We've been over this several times. VS is not interested in an alliance least of all within star. That would be the worse fit of any

User currently offlinePadcrasher From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 5384 times:

Well why isn't one of the largest airlines in Europe not interested in an alliance?

It's something they don't need. They're protected by huge barriers to competition by operating in and out of LHR. They can survive on London O&D alone. Their only competition is BA for premium revenue, hence you have haircuts and massages up front.

Bad for the UK, as more air commerce will flows through FRA and CDG.


User currently offlineBH346 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 3265 posts, RR: 14
Reply 5, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 5374 times:

I remember reading an article a few years ago stating that Richard Branson viewed alliances as being detrimental but they'll probably end up accepting them. They already have a deal going on with Continental and Singapore I believe.


Northwest Airlines - Some People Just Know How to Fly
User currently offlineJasepl From India, joined Jul 2004, 3582 posts, RR: 39
Reply 6, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 5355 times:

Well why isn't one of the largest airlines in Europe not interested in an alliance?

Largest? Hardly... VS are tiny in comparison!


User currently offlineCactus739 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2441 posts, RR: 31
Reply 7, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 5345 times:

They have code-share alliances with Signapore, Malaysia, bmi, Continental and America West.




You can't fix stupid.... - Ron White
User currently offlineZKSUJ From New Zealand, joined May 2004, 7085 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 5231 times:

VS basically have their own mini alliance with Virgin Atlantic, Virgin Express, Virgin America, Pacific Blue and Virgin Blue all being under one huge umbrella. Not to metion that they code share with several carriers.

User currently offlineAa777jr From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 5212 times:

VS got to the top alone, they wanna stay that way and Sir Richard is just fine going it alone.



User currently offlineEssjay From South Africa, joined Dec 2000, 75 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 5025 times:

Star seems to be the way to go; VS now also has an alliance with SA (I wonder if VS has dropped Nationwide?), who will be joining Star in the near future. SA also codeshares with BD so Star Alliance would be in quite a strong position as far as SA-UK routes go if VS had to join too.

User currently offlineKkfla737 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 1033 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 4989 times:

BD and VS will now be competeting for the first time (I believe) on the LHR-BOM route. How will this affect the relationship which has worked well for both airlines?

User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 4983 times:

VS basically have their own mini alliance with Virgin Atlantic, Virgin Express, Virgin America, Pacific Blue and Virgin Blue all being under one huge umbrella.

...perhaps I missed some'n, but there appear to be two airlines in the above statement which don't exist (and may never).


User currently offlineBA DC-10 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2001, 145 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 4970 times:

"Well why isn't one of the largest airlines in Europe not interested in an alliance?"

Well to be fair its not one the largest airlines - BA, AF/KLM, SK, LH, IB are bigger, I would probably think Alitalia, Ryanair maybe easyjet aswell.




User currently offlineSabena332 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 4955 times:

I would already be pleased when they would have an airline partner which is operating feeder flights to/from LHR. It is incredible expensive to book a long-haul flight on VS combined with a feeder flight on another airline here from Germany.

Patrick


User currently offlineByrdluvs747 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 2349 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 4953 times:

Seing how SQ has a 49% stake in VS, I don't see VS joining any alliance outside of Star. That's if VS wants to join in the first place.


The 747: The hands who designed it were guided by god.
User currently offlineVS045 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 192 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 4920 times:

VS have no neeed to join an alliance, because they do NOT want to fly everywhere, unlike BA, UA, LH etc. VS only flies to top leisure and business destinations and relies almost soley on O&D out of LHR and especially out of LGW.

Cheers,
VS045



4 engines 4 long haul
User currently offlineAntares From Australia, joined Jun 2004, 1402 posts, RR: 39
Reply 17, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 4907 times:

The fact that VS ins't in any alliance while its Singapore Airlines part owner is telling.

Quite frankly, alliances mean bugger all at the end of the day. Lots of talking, lots of executive down time, lots of change resistant members fighting with pro-change members, and seriously, Jo Public knows how to change flights at an airport, and has worked out that seamless baggage transfers can mean lost baggage or extra security checks anyhow.

No one can prove any benefit at all from alliances in the strict economic sense, since it is impossible to 'model' what would have happened if they had not come into effect.

The merits of alliances have been further burned by the likes of Qantas,SAS, Air NZ and BA doing thriving unofficial business with the members of allinaces other than the one they belong to anyhow.

None of the things we were promised by the alliance kiddies came true. No joint orders for identical jets, no equality of flight standards (thank goodness!), no same food, same unifgorms (gotta save heaps of money having only one type of uniform world wide...really...) no single shade of white, no identical business class cabins and no consistent recognition of FFP status.

It really is the biggest dog's breakfast of undergraduate theory meeting the cruel real world you could wish for, and is an embarrassment to many managements .

You should sit through some of the investor analyst meetings I've been to, the ones where the media are forbidden, and you would know that alliances are like most marriages, on the rocks....




us something important


User currently offlineEta unknown From Comoros, joined Jun 2001, 2073 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 4846 times:

Look at the VS route map- most destinations are ex British colonies or destinations that have other historical ties to the UK. Therefore, as stated above, most traffic is ex UK originating or destined.

Live in continental Europe and want to fly VS? Buy a cheap low-cost ticket to LHR/LGW then fly VS- they aren't too nterested in transit traffic.


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 4812 times:

None of the things we were promised by the alliance kiddies came true.

...nor is this statement remotely accurate by any stretch of the imagination.



No joint orders for identical jets

...yet


no equality of flight standards (thank goodness!)

As your followup comment clearly indicates, this statement is more subjective than factual.

While some airlines have made it exceedingly clear that they plan to maintain their individual identities both inside and out of the cabin-- others have indeed attempted to emulate their partner(s) flight/cabin/service standards.



no same food, same unifgorms, no single shade of white, no identical business class cabins

Refresh me again as to when/where the "alliance kiddies" promised any of this...?



and no consistent recognition of FFP status.

This is the sore spot in all alliances, particularly OneHeathroWorld.... that I will most certainly agree with you upon.


User currently offlineUA744KSFO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 4808 times:

"Don't they have a solid relationship with SQ as well?"

SQ owns 49% of VS.

I doubt VS would join an alliance though. Like EK, they are the type of carrier that would rather just have different codeshare partners than be tied to an alliance.


User currently offlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20394 posts, RR: 62
Reply 21, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 4781 times:

no same food, same unifgorms, no single shade of white, no identical business class cabins

Refresh me again as to when/where the "alliance kiddies" promised any of this...?


Correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't one of the longest-standing alliances been working for a number of years to align quite a bit of their product? Or are we talking a more global-type of an alliance such as Star or OneWorld in this thread?

http://www.nwa.com/corpinfo/newsc/2001/pr052920010672.html

Northwest and KLM seek to offer high-quality, matching products allowing flexibility for individual differences in accent and identity between the two partners.


I'm getting my apples and oranges confused reading the different posts.  Smile



International Homo of Mystery
User currently offlineAntares From Australia, joined Jun 2004, 1402 posts, RR: 39
Reply 22, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 4727 times:

I endured the original investor briefings by UA and BA and a few others on what the alliances would do, back in 1998, so I have no doubts about saying they haven't delivered. I even sat through Colin Marshall saying he could live with BA losing the BA identity if it controlled Oneworld, sorry oneworld, as a true global brand like Cunard.

Marshall was very good at a number of things, but the alliance thing 'escaped' as different things happened, not the least, the repeated failure of his brave efforts to merge AA/BA.

To all intents and purposes alliances are joining the ranks of the walking dead.

Joint service agreements and tightly constructed code shares are thriving. For example, you could argue that the very successful UA/LH code share out of Chicago would be little affected by either being in the same or different alliances.

I think it is reasonable to suggest that without alliances some carriers would have been forced out of business. Equally I suggest that it is not a good thing to modify competition to save the weak. the weak should die.

It is astonisingly, even to a cynic like myself, that after all this time neither alliance has achieved stable 100% integration of back office and reservations systems.

I doubt that I'm not alone in experiencing the check in apology for not being able to issue the boarding pass needed for the connecting carrier, not having my favourite seat booking honoured, even when it appears on my itinerary, and being treated like an alien entity on producing my Qantas Club card at a lounge where they think it must be a forgery because it spells Quantas without the 'u.'

To be fair to alliances, especially Star, they do offer some astonishingly good combo deals from time to time, but they are yield limited means of disposing of inventory not expected to sell by normal means.

I can think of two corporate travel management companies in Australia that can beat these deals any day on nearly any carrier you can name.

Alliances could roar back into frame in a world where there is more approval for flags of convenience carriers with AOCs issued by dubious authorities, and the professional standards of training, checking and general maintenance have been diminished to some pitiful lowest common denominator. Likewise if we had free trade agreements that abolished competition laws and consumer protection legislation.

I don't think too many of us would think this would be a good thing.

In the meantime most of the market will be motivated by price and availability, not meaningless oneworld or Star logo stuff.






User currently offlinePadcrasher From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 4719 times:

I think being over in Asia alliance have a less important role. But Trans atlantic is different.

CO/NW/DL control 35 % of all US domestic travel and those airlines customer base base is flying over CDG/AMS. There is a huge amount of business that is funneled to those hubs. Nobody in those areas of the US dominated by Skyteam even think London for connecting. And before all these alliances came about London was the number 1 choice.


User currently offlineTango-Bravo From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3802 posts, RR: 29
Reply 24, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 4658 times:

Surely being in an alliance is more beneficial than not?

Not when the true costs of alliances are calculated. Which is probably why Sir Richard has opted out of an alliance by not opting into one in the first place. He, like Herb Kelleher, have refused to be sucked into the "everybody's doing it" syndrome on the issue of alliances. Sir Richard and Herb are also uniquely astute in their business acumen, at least in the airline industry, and undoutedly have seen through all of the alliance smoke-and-mirrors and discovered the ugly reality that alliances are all about higher costs with no corresponding increase in revenues -- before they ever gave serious thought to being sucked into an alliance


25 Antares : Tango-Bravo, That is precisely what the Australian traffic statistics prove. If you add up the market share in the year to July 1998 on the Deartment
26 Ual777contrail : Topic: Why Is VS Not In An Alliance? What do they bring to the table? LHR long haul. so what, UA,BA,BM,LH,AA,AF,EI,CX they all do what vs does. I thin
27 VS11 : 1. Keeping brand recognition and awareness. 2. The existence of alliances is against what Virgin stands for (in a business sense): competition, innova
28 Deltaflyertoo : Technically they are in one with Delta and Continental. The fact that I can book a flight through Continental or Delta.com to Heathrow on VS, choose m
29 7LBAC111 : As I have said many times, VS are building their own mini alliance! They have Virgin Atlantic, Virgin AMerica (eventually) Virgin Nigeria, Virgin Expr
30 Sjoerd : Virgin Express is a low cost carrier and doesn't even fly to the UK ! It has now merged with SN and all SN flights to LHR are operated by BA !
31 7LBAC111 : Sjoerd - read the post again. I already discounted TV. And for the record, all the VS companies EXCEPT Atlantic are low costs, but this doesn't mean t
32 Monkeyboi : I always find it amusing in these topics how people always mention BA as Virgin's main competitor. I disagree. Having worked for both, I believe that
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Is EY Not In Flytecomm? posted Sat Apr 22 2006 17:10:45 by RicardoFG
Why No African Airline In An Alliance? posted Wed Mar 2 2005 10:59:54 by RootsAir
What Airlines Are Not In An Alliance posted Tue Jan 2 2001 19:19:24 by JAT
Why Isn't JAL In An Alliance? posted Tue Mar 8 2005 20:48:05 by Erikwilliam
Why Isn't JAL In An Alliance? posted Sat Sep 11 2004 09:53:49 by Mika10021
Why No Middle Eastern Airlines In An Alliance? posted Wed Sep 3 2003 12:41:19 by Mozart
Why Isn't Virgin In An Alliance? posted Fri Nov 12 1999 01:51:19 by Fly US Airways
Why Is Gatwick Not On The Skyservice Website? posted Mon Oct 23 2006 11:25:41 by 8herveg
Why Is BMed Not Selling Freetown Flights? posted Thu Sep 14 2006 18:28:11 by ZuluTime
Why Is SK Not More Succesful? posted Wed May 17 2006 15:54:05 by Skyhigh