Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Union Busting  
User currently offlineAirCascadia From Canada, joined Dec 2004, 41 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 8625 times:

Pilots group want Boston-Maine Airways airline certificate revoked

By PAT McGOWAN

Democrat Staff Writer


PORTSMOUTH — The Airline Pilots Association (ALPA) is seeking to have the Department of Transportation revoke Boston-Maine Airways airline certificate

According to its attorney, Marcus Migliore, ALPA is fighting Boston-Maine’s right to fly because it believes Boston-Maine should not have been granted "large jet aircraft authority" because the airline was "a money loosing operation," and the use of 727 aircraft allowed Boston-Maine to pick up the work of Pease-based Pan Am Airlines.

This was a transparent effort to avoid the union, and its ownership is not fit to responsibly and safely run an airline, said Migliore.

Guilford Transportation, parent company to Boston-Maine and Pan Am, has been involved in a court battle with ALPA since Pan Am closed its doors in November.

ALPA claims unionized Pan Am was shut down so flights could be moved to nonunion Boston-Maine in a "union busting" transfer of work.

The filing, made with the Department of Transportation in Washington on Dec. 31, states that "companies owned and managed by the Mellon Group (owners of Guilford) have repeatedly transferred work from unionized to nonunion groups to avoid their collective bargaining obligations under the RLA (Railway Labor Act), repeatedly discharged pilots because they were unwilling to fly in violation of FAA safety rules, repeatedly refused to comply with final and binding decisions of system boards of adjustment as required under the RLA, and willfully violated environmental laws."

Migliore said that ALPA intends to show that Boston-Maine owner Guilford has, on several occasions, been in violation of federal labor law and environmental violations in order to prove its case and strip Boston-Maine of its certificate.

"We assert that these repeated obvious violations show a lack of necessary compliance disposition because the Guilford ownership group has repeatedly and flagrantly failed to observe and respect legal obligations," said Migliore.

Representatives from Guilford and Boston-Maine were unavailable for comment


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Union Busting posted Wed Jan 5 2005 21:01:34 by AirCascadia
Delta Flight Attendant Union Question. posted Sat Dec 2 2006 00:29:24 by Tu154
F9 Flight Attendants Reject Union Again posted Fri Dec 1 2006 03:57:55 by NZblue
Mesaba Union To Announce Concessions posted Mon Nov 27 2006 20:36:05 by KarlB737
Non-Union Delta Vs. Union US Airways posted Wed Nov 15 2006 17:39:58 by CO767FA
Pilots Union Reaches Deal With Mesaba posted Sun Oct 29 2006 02:27:25 by KarlB737
CO Employees Reject Union posted Thu Oct 12 2006 22:00:12 by COewrAAtysAZ
Union Has Called For Strike In Ryanair posted Wed Oct 11 2006 19:33:18 by Bullpitt
Union: NW Xld DC-9 Flights Due Pilot Shortage posted Mon Oct 9 2006 20:06:04 by Utapao
CO Ramp Agents Voting On Union posted Tue Sep 19 2006 15:26:19 by CLE757