Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
ATA Cuts Some MDW Service..  
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2657 times:

ATA To Drop 9 Cities, Reduce 2 in FEB

Out of MDW...

CLT 1/3/05
PIT 2/4/05
PHL 2/4/05
MIA 2/4/05
FLL 2/4/05
LAX 2/4/05
MCO 2/4/05
SEA 2/4/05
PHX 2/4/05

Reduce Service
LAS
SFO

24 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJfrworld From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 365 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2586 times:

It looks like ATA is dropping overlapping routes with WN out of MDW. 7 of 9 dropped cities are routes already covered out of MDW with WN - the exception is MIA and PIT. MIA is not a WN city but WN will most likely serve the PIT - MDW route when PIT is up and running

I wonder if ATA will boost frequencies on routes not covered by WN such as MSP, EWR, BOS, DEN, DFW, etc??


User currently offlineFlyPNS1 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 6606 posts, RR: 24
Reply 2, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2567 times:

ATA will have 44 daily flights from MDW once this is all done...down from the current 70. Chicago Express will go down to 16 daily flights from MDW...down from the current 60.



User currently offlineERJ170 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 6763 posts, RR: 17
Reply 3, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2559 times:

I was in MIA this past week and the sign at the ATA counter in Terminal H says they will cease service 1/9/2005. Which is correct? 2/4 or 1/9?


Aiming High and going far..
User currently offlineNjdevilsin03 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 728 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2511 times:

With ATA almost gone in FLL who will take over their gate? and counter space? Usair or Airtan to add a few more flights?


717, 727, 731, 732, 733, 734, 735, 73G, 738, 752, 753, 762, 763, 777, DC9, MD80, DC10, L1011, ERJ, CRJ, ATR, DH8, A300,
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 968 posts, RR: 51
Reply 5, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 2513 times:

I wonder if ATA will boost frequencies on routes not covered by WN such as MSP, EWR, BOS, DEN, DFW, etc??

ATA will return a respectable number of 738 back to lessors, so I assume they will not be boosting capacity on other routes.

MIA is not a WN city but WN will most likely serve the PIT - MDW route when PIT is up and running

MIA and FLL are not even 20 miles apart, so I suppose it isn't that suprising. I don't believe MIA was even that large of a presence for ATA?


User currently offlineAirStatDFW From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 376 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 2479 times:

if ATA is dropping LAX, SEA how is WN going to do a code share to Hawaii?? WN doesn't fly to SFO. I have also wondered if DFW was going to get increase service, maybe a 757 we haven't had those in for a while.

AirStatDFW


User currently offlineLN-MOW From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 1908 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 2386 times:

ATA isn't dropping all these cities. They are dropping the MDW-flights. The Hawaii-services will remain and they will codeshare with WN and get WN feed.
Some of these cities will also be served from IND.



- I am LN-MOW, and I approve this message.
User currently offlineATA767 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 419 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2332 times:

I think IND might see a slight increase in flights. That will keep ATA Number 1 in IND I guess. This sucks,what could be their business plan.

User currently offlineWnsocal From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 129 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2312 times:

ATA767-

IMO....ATA's business plan is to turn all scheduled flight over to SWA. This will take place over the next 2-3 years.

Opnlguy-

Where did you get your info on the cuts? Not doubting it just wondering where you get the info, because I can never seem to find any press releases about their service.

Also, when do you think WN will announce the code share plans.



Airline Nut
User currently offlineLV From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 2005 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2304 times:

You notice DFW isnt getting cut.....humm, an immediate fix to the Wright Ad. without taking on AA directly?

Oh and how about that, neither is DEN...looks like two more markets for WN


User currently offlineGift4tbone From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 612 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2295 times:

ok, about hawaii, i don't think any of you guys get this codeshare, or maybe its me. But if i recall the codeshares will only be out of MDW, meaning that if you switch to TZ on a WN ticket, it will only be in MDW, and TZ doesn't have a MDW-HNL or anyother hawaii city flight. so hawaii is out of bounds, untill WN/TZ announce their next Codeshare city, which as mentioned in many articles could be LAX, LAS, PHX, SEA, etc, now from these cities when they announce the codeshare we can talk hawaii. Until then this is NOT a system wide codeshare, so as much as I hate to admit it, no hawaii this time around.

-Tony@PVD



Top 3 airports: PVD 26.0%(115 flights), PHL 15.6%(69 flights), PHX 12.0%(53 flights)
User currently offlineATA767 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 419 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2281 times:

That still leaves 22 Destinations served out of MDW (not all daily). This sucks!

User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 968 posts, RR: 51
Reply 13, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2253 times:

Also, when do you think WN will announce the code share plans.

End of January... given that WN likes to make press releases on Thuresdays for some reason, I'd say either 1/21 or 1/28


User currently offlineSWAFA30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2242 times:

ok, about hawaii, i don't think any of you guys get this codeshare, or maybe its me. But if i recall the codeshares will only be out of MDW, meaning that if you switch to TZ on a WN ticket, it will only be in MDW, and TZ doesn't have a MDW-HNL or anyother hawaii city flight. so hawaii is out of bounds, untill WN/TZ announce their next Codeshare city, which as mentioned in many articles could be LAX, LAS, PHX, SEA, etc, now from these cities when they announce the codeshare we can talk hawaii. Until then this is NOT a system wide codeshare, so as much as I hate to admit it, no hawaii this time around.


That's correct. In the press releases and internal memos discussing the WN/TZ codeshare...SWA has said that the code share will intially apply to nine(9) destinations out of MDW with the possibility of future expansion to other TZ/WN cities such as PHX, LAX, and SEA.

Notice in the excerpt below how the reporter theorizes that SWA could offer service to Hawaii via the ATA codeshare. You'll notice that the article also mentions LGA and DCA which are actually much more likely to be first on the codeshare list although you'll notice there aren't any "SWA to LGA!!" threads going on...I guess SWA service(via codeshare) to New York and Washington DC proper are not quite as sexy as the idea of SWA selling seats to Waikiki Beach. We have a good time here at A.net but sometimes you gotta dig through a big ol pile of speculation to get to the facts.

"The Dallas-based airline is acquiring leases on gates and a maintenance hangar from ATA Airlines as part of ATA's bankruptcy in addition to the code-sharing, which will give it access to flights to Hawaii, New York's LaGuardia Airport and Washington's Reagan National Airport, the Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday. ATA, which has larger planes than Southwest's Boeing 737s, flies nonstop to Honolulu and Maui."

http://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/stories/2005/01/03/daily22.html


User currently offlineNomorerjs From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 467 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 2169 times:

UA would love to see TZ drop MDW-CUN so they could pick up Chicago - Cancun rights. AA has 3x daily 757s during peak season and UA would prefer this over the weekly flights to CZM.

User currently offlinePlanespotting From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 3527 posts, RR: 5
Reply 16, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 2144 times:

WNsocal-

The ATA business plan is NOT to turn over any parts of their operations to WN. It has been repeated several times by the ups at Southwest that it is in Southwests best interests that ATA remains an airline entity in itself (an independentally owned and operated airline). The ATA business plan is obviously to downsize their scheduled service portion of the airline, and getting back to the military and travel charter end of the business. They will still operate heavily out of IND, well as maintaining a presence at MDW. Southwests part in this was to inject some much needed cash into ATA to keep it from being gobbled up by AirTran, a much more fierce competitor than ATA will be for a long time.



Do you like movies about gladiators?
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 968 posts, RR: 51
Reply 17, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 2117 times:

It has been repeated several times by the ups at Southwest that it is in Southwests best interests that ATA remains an airline entity in itself (an independentally owned and operated airline)

ATA will remain independenly opperated, but WN has purchased a significant share of non-voting ATA stock. They aren't exactly independently owned any more...


User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 2085 times:

>>>Opnlguy-

>>>Where did you get your info on the cuts? Not doubting it just wondering where you get the info, because I can never seem to find any press releases about their service.

Some of it comes from:

http://messages.yahoo.com/bbs?action=t&type=r&board=7080754&sid=7080754


User currently offlineOceanic From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 134 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 2049 times:

Woo Hoo! SRQ dodges the MDW bullet once again, first AirTran and now ATA. I would have never thought it possible. I wonder how AirTran and ATA will compete on the MDW-SRQ run. I imagine ATA will match the fares. Fun times are ahead  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

[Edited 2005-01-07 06:54:49]

User currently offlineCOEWRNJ From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 1064 posts, RR: 19
Reply 20, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 2024 times:

If you are booked on a TZ flight like MDW-PHX after the cut date, do you automatically get put onto WN? Does anyone have any info. My cousin will be visiting me in Arizona from Chicago in March and is booked on TZ so I was just wondering if she is going to have to book new tickets.

User currently offlineWnsocal From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 129 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1990 times:

<<
The ATA business plan is NOT to turn over any parts of their operations to WN. It has been repeated several times by the ups at Southwest that it is in Southwests best interests that ATA remains an airline entity in itself (an independentally owned and operated airline). The ATA business plan is obviously to downsize their scheduled service portion of the airline, and getting back to the military and travel charter end of the business. They will still operate heavily out of IND, well as maintaining a presence at MDW. Southwests part in this was to inject some much needed cash into ATA to keep it from being gobbled up by AirTran, a much more fierce competitor than ATA will be for a long time. >>>

You are correct the higher ups did say that, but if you believe it then you may want to take a good look at what is going on currently.
1. ATA is discontinuing service on overlapping markets, not WN.
2. WN will own 27.5% of the "new" ATA.
3. WN has a voice in who is selected in key ATA positions.
4. WN is already interviewing ATA folks for WN positions.
5. WN will handle ground services where it makes sense
(my guess is MDW, LAX, PHX, LAS, SEA, MCO)


IMO Southwest made a great move and smart positioning in this deal. If ATA goes on and is profitable WN can slowly take over ATA route and then code-share on that route. If ATA does not succeed then with WN's 27.5% stake they have the right to get their money back. How do they do this? They take the DCA and LGA slots, more MDW gates, and whatever route they decide they can operate at a profit.



Airline Nut
User currently offlineJohnboy From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 2586 posts, RR: 7
Reply 22, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 1956 times:

FWIW, there are ATA flights out of PHX to Honolulu and Maui IIRC.....


In any case, it'll be fun to see what WN and TZ end up doing down the road. The possibilites could be quite interesting, and at the very least, will provide for many a thread on this board.


User currently offlinePlanespotting From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 3527 posts, RR: 5
Reply 23, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 1803 times:

WNsocal and DFWrev...-

ATA is downsizing, therefore it's only logical that ATA discontinue flights to overlapping cities to get more airplanes available to give back to lessors. Southwest has just received 6 more gates at MDW, so it only makes sense that they would expand in MDW, and have ATA take a step backwards there. From that you cannot infer any kind of "ingestion" from southwest of ATA's scheduled flights. You don't see Southwest and ATA doing anything at all together in IND do you, or in any other city they share?

Southwest is only giving preferred INTERVIEW status to pilots at ATA, and it was a stipulation of the bankruptcy agreement that ATA pushed for (same as the codeshares, meaning southwest wasn't necessarily in favor). That doesn't mean they are hiring them. And they are only pilots, not rampers, not CSA's, not F/A's.

Nonvoting stock is nonvoting stock. They will have clout on who gets into what position, but they won't have any official power in terms of day to day operations of the airline. Southwest will hopefully make a tidy profit on their 27.5% of ATA stock, and get out clean in a few years when ATA has transformed into a leaner and mainly vacation and charter airline.



Do you like movies about gladiators?
User currently offlineSWAbubba From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 154 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1645 times:

And they are only pilots, not rampers, not CSA's, not F/A's.

Planespotting,

Where did you hear that? The article on SWAlife mentions interviewing qualified ATA employees after internal applicants, I can't imagine we have too many internals applying for pilot slots.

Nice signature, BTW. I got to see BF this summer- it was a fantastic show!


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
ATA To Start MDW-PIT Service. posted Tue Apr 1 2003 23:25:40 by Airplanelover
ATA Airlines Adding New Service To Hawaii posted Mon Nov 20 2006 23:05:04 by ATA767
Why No CLT-MDW Service By US Airways? posted Wed May 17 2006 18:59:41 by United777ORD
Commutair Cuts Some Direct Flights At Albany posted Sat Jul 30 2005 04:38:34 by KarlB737
ATA Adding Flights @ MDW posted Tue Jul 19 2005 02:21:01 by LotPilot
ATA Adds LAS-HNL Service! posted Wed Jan 12 2005 16:46:31 by ATA767
ATA Beefs Up Its Service In Indiana posted Sun Jan 9 2005 18:30:56 by KarlB737
UA/TED To Start MDW Service posted Thu Jan 6 2005 14:06:29 by JumboClassic
ATA To End MDW-CLT posted Mon Dec 13 2004 17:29:21 by N670UW
Will FL Discontinue Any ATA Cities From MDW posted Sun Oct 31 2004 15:54:43 by Kkfla737