Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
More Carriers Looking At PIT  
User currently offlinePITrules From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 3177 posts, RR: 5
Posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 5067 times:

Looks like there will be a couple more low fare carriers in PIT in the near future.

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribune-review/trib/regional/s_291054.html


For those that thought PIT would never recover from the loss of US Airways, I still think that is not the case. US Airways only had about 120 mainline flights when the hub was abandoned, which is now at 70. If Southwest adds to have about 40 flights, and a few more carriers enter the market, PIT will be right back where it was with a good level of service. It may even have better service if US Airways survives and keeps a handfull of their own flights.

PIT is also on the top of Lufthansa's list as well. If this service is started, the only real loss of the US Airways hub would be the Express service to all the small Pennsylvania towns. I'll take the cheaper fares and higher O&D traffic any day.


FLYi
27 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineFlaps From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 1270 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 5004 times:

I agree, we will be fine. While the prestige of having a major hub is nice and certainly has many benefits, being held hostage by a perennially failing carrier isnt worth it. From a general consumer standpoint the humbling of US at PIT has all the making of a huge plus.

User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 4978 times:

The terminal at PIT alone makes it worth the stop.

Perhaps O&D isn't as high as PHL or EWR, etc, but the airport is awesome. When I lived in DC would book all westerly travel via PIT (on US of course) because of the terminal. Avoided that hell hole PHL like the plague!

Only exception being that sorry excuse for an air terminal called the "Commuter Terminal". What a hole! Needs to be demolished! Needs to be something like the new commuter terminal E at CLT.



User currently offlinePHLBOS From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 7519 posts, RR: 24
Reply 3, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 4959 times:

From the article:

Pittsburgh International now has several low-cost airlines: AirTran, Independence Air, ATA and USA3000.

The article doesn't state anything about ATA leaving PIT later this month in anticipation of WN coming in.

It's unlikely Southwest will offer a Pittsburgh to Philadelphia flight, at least initially. That's because the airline does not have enough gates to add flights at Philadelphia International, Southwest Chief Executive Gary Kelly said Wednesday.

If that's indeed the case, should US still be around, it may not be too late for FL to re-establish its PIT-PHL route it once had. However, should US cease operations, there will be NO shortage of gates at PHL.




"TransEastern! You'll feel like you've never left the ground because we treat you like dirt!" SNL Parady ad circa 1981
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 4934 times:

PIT is also on the top of Lufthansa's list as well.

Says whom?


User currently offlineN766UA From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 8234 posts, RR: 23
Reply 5, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 4869 times:

Pitt's hard work has finally paid off... meanwhile CLE's idiot managers are still chasing off airlines like B6 and F9. Best of luck to pitt, they deserve it. I think they'll be better off without US dominating.


This Website Censors Me
User currently offlineUsairways85 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 3402 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 4851 times:

A few things to add. I believe Southwest has gained 2 gates at Terminal D. I tried looking at the arrival reports on Philly's website however for some reason none of Southwest's flts were listed. If this is the case, Southwest would have 6 gates for 41 flts. In my opinion they definitely have room to expand at least another 8-10 flts.

However, i believe Airtran should really take a close look at both PIT and PHL. They haven't done much to expand lately and have put these airports on the backburner. If they don't act quickly they will lose both these airports to Southwest. At the same time Jetblue is making a name for itself at BOS and diminishing the hope Airtran had there as well. Thus, leaving only BWI has a good Northeast base for Airtran.

Next, i don't see Lufthansa flying to PIT...maybe on a one of those long range 737's though. Should be interesting if LH even keeps MUC-CLT if US goes under.


User currently offlineIsitsafenow From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 4984 posts, RR: 23
Reply 7, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 4835 times:

What the hell would Lufthansa want with Pittsburgh? Non stop A340's to Erie and Bradford? Find another pill will ya?
My money is on Spirit. They have the planes coming and need a boost. This could be it.
By the way..Pit does not rule. USAIRWAYS is proving that with their famous "Pittsburgh Regress".
safe



If two people agree on EVERYTHING, then one isn't necessary.
User currently offlineN670UW From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1604 posts, RR: 8
Reply 8, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 4838 times:

PIT is also on the top of Lufthansa's list as well.

Says whom?


I don't think PIT is on the top of LH's list per se, but a LH spokeswoman has said PIT is one of a few cities being considered for service.

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04267/383838.stm
"Lufthansa spokeswoman Jennifer Urbaniak confirmed that Pittsburgh was among the cities the airline is considering for service."

---
Should be interesting if LH even keeps MUC-CLT if US goes under.

Highly unlikely it would be kept.


N670UW


User currently offlineFA4B6 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 4813 times:

Could JFK-PIT service really work for B6 as an A320 route or is this the sorta thing that we'd see with the 190's?

B6 could pick up some slack .. like PIT-JFK, BOS, FLL, MCO, and LGB.


User currently offlinePITrules From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 3177 posts, RR: 5
Reply 10, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 4784 times:

What the hell would Lufthansa want with Pittsburgh? Non stop A340's to Erie and Bradford? Find another pill will ya?
My money is on Spirit. They have the planes coming and need a boost. This could be it.
By the way..Pit does not rule. USAIRWAYS is proving that with their famous "Pittsburgh Regress".
safe


That's an intelligent post. Well, if PIT isn't at the top of LH's list, it sure isn't at the bottom either. There has been plenty of info on these boards about the strong traffic between Germany and Pittsburgh.

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribune-review/business/s_274566.html

What city has more potential for FRA service than PIT, that currently has none?


[Edited 2005-01-08 21:14:07]


FLYi
User currently offlinePHLBOS From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 7519 posts, RR: 24
Reply 11, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 4734 times:

A few things to add. I believe Southwest has gained 2 gates at Terminal D. I tried looking at the arrival reports on Philly's website however for some reason none of Southwest's flts were listed. If this is the case, Southwest would have 6 gates for 41 flts. In my opinion they definitely have room to expand at least another 8-10 flts.

Usairways85,

You are correct, WN does have ex-US gates D2 & D4 in addition to its 4 Terminal E gates. Most of WN's PHL expansion plans through last July did not take into account of the additional D gates. Plus, there presently are plans being made to expand Terminal E (a.k.a. the Hammerhead E project) to give WN a total of 8 gates excluding D2 & D4. However, should US cease operations, those expansion plans could be scapped in favor of WN moving to B & C.

However, i believe Airtran should really take a close look at both PIT and PHL. They haven't done much to expand lately and have put these airports on the backburner. If they don't act quickly they will lose both these airports to Southwest. At the same time Jetblue is making a name for itself at BOS and diminishing the hope Airtran had there as well. Thus, leaving only BWI has a good Northeast base for Airtran.

I agree with you regarding FL's operations at PHL & PIT although they do have more non-stops out of PHL (ATL, BOS, many Florida cities) than out of PIT (ATL, FLL & MCO).

As far as BOS is concerned, while FL may not offer any Florida non-stops out of Logan (probably due to the limited range of the 717); they do offer some unique non-stops out of BOS (ATL, BWI, CAK, PHF, PHL & RDU) that B6 does not serve.

Back to PIT, FL could if it, wanted to, add PHL (before WN grabs it), BOS (before B6 grabs it), LGA, and DFW along with maybe a couple other cities that neither B6 and WN presently serve and carve a unique niche market for themselves like they did at BOS.

However, something tells me that with reports of US getting closer to liquidation, Joe Leonard may be secretly eyeing the northeast Shuttle market. That would be the only explanation I see as towards why FL has not went into high gear expansionwise over at PHL, PIT, and even DFW as of late.




"TransEastern! You'll feel like you've never left the ground because we treat you like dirt!" SNL Parady ad circa 1981
User currently offlineBlhp68 From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 149 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 4701 times:

For all of you PIT fanatics:
Any chance of an airline offering N/S back to MCI. I know those non-stops are sorely missed amongst the KC area/. I was speculating either WN or FL down the road a bit though. Thoughts?


User currently offlineStevenUhl777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 4665 times:

PIT is also on the top of Lufthansa's list as well

Not to beat a dead horse, but didn't LH use to operate PIT-FRA, and pulled out? If so, why would they restart it, especially given the status of US de-hubbing PIT? Seems LH could put that a/c on a better route somewhere else.


User currently offlinePITrules From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 3177 posts, RR: 5
Reply 14, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 4628 times:

LH never served PIT. You might be thinking of US Airways, which served the route and recently dropped it. The reason LH might be more successful is because local business leaders put together a travel bank (see article) for LH service (much like they did in PDX). This is something US Airways never had.

I said PIT was on top of LH's list because they said themselves a year ago PIT, CLT, and MCO were the top contenders. CLT got the service, leaving PIT and MCO. I'd be surprised to see MCO get the service before PIT because of this travel bank set up by PIT, and the US Bayer HQ is here.



FLYi
User currently offlineERJ170 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 6764 posts, RR: 17
Reply 15, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 4610 times:

The US Bayer Agriculture HQ is in Research Triangle Park, NC.. Does that mean RDU will get LH? I highly doubt that. Many of them will fly on the RDU-LGW-Germany flights.. I'm sure the same will happen at PIT. The Bayers people will fly on connecting flights out of PHL or CLT. There has to be some serious O&D or some serious incentives offered. And they have to be able to put some serious Cargo in those bellies. But who knows? Time will tell..


Aiming High and going far..
User currently offlineTango-Bravo From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3805 posts, RR: 29
Reply 16, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 4582 times:

What the hell would Lufthansa want with Pittsburgh?

In spite of USAirways reduction of flight operations at PIT, they nonetheless plan to retain a significant presence there, giving Star Alliance partner LH a large selection of codeshare destinations to offer in the heavily populated (by both people and international businesses) regions surrounding PIT. Which is to say nothing of the potentially solid O&D destination PIT may be for LH, as indicated by the travel bank mentioned in previous replies.


User currently offlineIsitsafenow From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 4984 posts, RR: 23
Reply 17, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 4579 times:

Now lets think about this...Pittsburgh or Orlando? Where do the people of the world wish to go if they had a choice here? HHMMMM
This is tough one. Hey, I just remembered, when I was at MCO just after Thanksgiving I saw four, count em, four Virgin Atlantic airliners parked at the gates there....I could toss in the other non-USA carriers but why bother.
Now back to the Q....Pittsburgh or Orlando?
This one will keep me up all night...........



If two people agree on EVERYTHING, then one isn't necessary.
User currently offlineCltguy From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 598 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 4573 times:

RE- CLT-MUC service....if the US Hub goes away then that service will most likely stay. LH folks have said they are VERY impressed with the local passengers on that flight and not so impressed with the connecting traffic in CLT.

User currently offlinePITrules From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 3177 posts, RR: 5
Reply 19, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 4529 times:

Now lets think about this...Pittsburgh or Orlando? Where do the people of the world wish to go if they had a choice here? HHMMMM
This is tough one. Hey, I just remembered, when I was at MCO just after Thanksgiving I saw four, count em, four Virgin Atlantic airliners parked at the gates there....I could toss in the other non-USA carriers but why bother.
Now back to the Q....Pittsburgh or Orlando?
This one will keep me up all night...........


Well don't lose too much sleep over it dude....I don't need to defend LH's position when there are plenty of links to newspapers on this thread already. Maybe both MCO and PIT will get service over time, who knows? I started this thread because it apperars PIT will be fine without US Airways, not to engage in a pissing match with you.



FLYi
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4474 times:

What city has more potential for FRA service than PIT, that currently has none?

...would you prefer that listed by continent, by nation, or by alphabetical order?


User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32737 posts, RR: 72
Reply 21, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4444 times:

Now lets think about this...Pittsburgh or Orlando? Where do the people of the world wish to go if they had a choice here? HHMMMM
This is tough one. Hey, I just remembered, when I was at MCO just after Thanksgiving I saw four, count em, four Virgin Atlantic airliners parked at the gates there....I could toss in the other non-USA carriers but why bother.
Now back to the Q....Pittsburgh or Orlando?
This one will keep me up all night...........


Outside of the United Kingdom, traffic between Orlando and Europe is actually weak. Europeans perfer South Florida, outside of the British. Also, yields are horrendous.

RE- CLT-MUC service....if the US Hub goes away then that service will most likely stay. LH folks have said they are VERY impressed with the local passengers on that flight and not so impressed with the connecting traffic in CLT.

The lack of connecting passengers on Lufthansa's CLT-MUC service is probably the reason it is only operating 3x a week now through the end of February, and then only 5 times a week in March. It will go daily again for the summer.

I'm sure Lufthansa will stay in Charlotte if US Airways goes under, but the service would most likely be moved to Frankfurt.



a.
User currently offlineIsitsafenow From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 4984 posts, RR: 23
Reply 22, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4407 times:

There is no match. My point is this. LH may add one rt a day to Pit. That's saying a big fat nothing.
Southwest wont put too many there in the first year because of one thing. They don't have the airplanes to saturate the market over a short period (one year or less of time). About 18 months ago, USAirways and USEX had 350 plus departures a day. What do they have now? Whats on the horizon? I deal with facts and not dreams...Dreams are nice but looking at Pit over the next 12 months and it doesn't look promising for getting back to all those departures a day...that's all I state. I apologize for the pop off attitude..That's not like me.
keep smilin'
safe



If two people agree on EVERYTHING, then one isn't necessary.
User currently offlinePITrules From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 3177 posts, RR: 5
Reply 23, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 4356 times:

No need to apologize. I agree that PIT most likely will not have the same number of flights. However, I do think the airport will get over US Airways, and become a successful post-hub airport much like MCI, RDU, and BNA.


FLYi
User currently offlineERJ170 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 6764 posts, RR: 17
Reply 24, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 4353 times:

As do I.. I think that PIT will come out well.. It may again have 2 or 3 international destinations, plus any that US maintains. With WN.. I believe they will probably have up to 12 destinations or so.. probably 4 or 5 to each.. but i doubt it will get any more than that.. If I were PIT, I would honestly be happy with the amount of international traffic US left there.. When AA pulled out of RDU, BNA, and SJC.. they pulled A LOT of international destiantions.. leaving only 1 at RDU (LGW)..


Aiming High and going far..
25 RiddlePilot215 : QUOTE: Pitt's hard work has finally paid off... meanwhile CLE's idiot managers are still chasing off airlines like B6 and F9. Best of luck to pitt, th
26 OptionsCLE : Cleveland's airport is about as much of a mess as they come. No room to expand, mediocre facilities, out of this world landing fees (I believe it was
27 Allstarflyer : Seems a shame that some carriers(mainly LCC's) couldn't advance upon PIT, with its access to the East Coast. I speak mainly of Western-based carriers,
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
WN Needs More Gate Space At PIT? posted Sat Sep 10 2005 21:13:14 by PITA333
Hooters Air Looking At PIT posted Thu Apr 22 2004 22:49:33 by Garnetpalmetto
More US Changes At PIT posted Fri Jun 6 2003 05:19:44 by Myzery
More USAirways Service Upgrades At PIT (PIT-IND) posted Tue Nov 22 2005 14:41:02 by Tornado82
Emirates Looking At Possibly Leasing More Aircraft posted Thu Jan 15 2004 13:58:20 by Emirates777
Any New Carriers Looking To Open At SJC? posted Tue Jun 10 2003 07:53:45 by SJCguy
UAL Says Looking At 787 And A350 posted Tue Dec 12 2006 19:10:05 by NYC777
SWF Looking At Terminal Expansion posted Mon Dec 4 2006 22:02:20 by BigOrange
Is It True That UA Is Looking At A Pago Pago Stop? posted Sat Dec 2 2006 06:47:31 by United777atGU
Why Are Fares So Low At PIT? posted Sat Nov 11 2006 20:20:20 by ATLAaron