Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
SQs MAN/ZRH Traffic Rights  
User currently offlineTrident2e From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 2264 times:

Why does SQ have traffic rights between MAN and ZRH? I can't imagine any passengers actually fly this route with SQ as they only offer the full unrestricted fare of over £900 return. I understand that SQ would much rather have a passenger travelling all the way through to SIN, but it seems odd that they have these rights but deter customers from using them. Any thoughts?

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCrosswind From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 2598 posts, RR: 58
Reply 1, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2244 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Singapore Airlines' fares on the route used to be much cheaper; they've been operating MAN-ZRH for over 10 years...

I'd assume they regard any MAN-ZRH pax as an inconvenience - ie having to offload a few bags at a time when you're trying to onload hundreds of others, and as such aren't interested unless they can gouge the highest fares possible out of them!

Regards
CROSSWIND


User currently offlineFlySwiss From Switzerland, joined Jul 2003, 443 posts, RR: 43
Reply 2, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2149 times:

I checked last fall the SQ's fare for ZRH-MAN-ZRH somewhre in the web and I found a fare for CHF 180.-- plus tax.

SQ is flying this route only twice a week on tuesdays and thurdays. I can't image that SQ has a lot of pax traffic between ZRH and MAN.



Simle at the world and the world smiles back :)
User currently offlineSwissgabe From Switzerland, joined Jan 2000, 5266 posts, RR: 33
Reply 3, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 2060 times:

This kind of route they don't fly just to sell ZRH-MAN but they combine two cities as a SIN-ZRH-MAN-SIN wouldn't work out.

As it has been mentioned, they are selling good priced tickets if anyone want's to go on them. But they don't push it in Switzerland.



Smooth as silk - Royal Orchid Service /// Suid-Afrikaanse Lugdiens - Springbok
User currently offlineAMS From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 1691 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 1891 times:

SQ also has combined AMS with MAN in the Past

Regards,
AMS


User currently offlineEx_SQer From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 1435 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 1889 times:

SQ operated fifth freedom sectors intra-Europe for decades because until recently there weren't economical medium-sized long haul aircraft capable of working nonstop point-to-point flights. Today only ZRH-MAN is left.

As Swissgabe has mentioned, SQ has never really pushed those flights, and unlike what some people on this forum seem to believe, those fifth freedoms are hardly lucrative. With only a handful of frequencies, SQ can only attract a small number of leisure travellers. Sometimes, they offer rockbottom fares to try and get some revenue, however little. Other times, they don't bother and only list unrestricted fares.

The only time I recall SQ actually promoting a fare was a joint fare between CX and SQ on AMS-MAN (did I just hear a thump? Must be Singapore_Air fainting at the idea of the two airlines cooperating!). There was a period in 1997-98 when the two flew six combined frequencies between AMS and MAN and they had a special fare. Even then, only a small handful of leisure travellers bought it... the only times there were significant numbers of paxs were when either city hosted its respective gay pride/mardi gras  Smile/happy/getting dizzy


User currently offlineZrs70 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 3120 posts, RR: 9
Reply 6, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 1865 times:

I have flown the route twice as part of a *A RTW. Great airline for this short hop!

Similarly, I've flown:
MAN-AMS on SQ (discontinued)
MAD-FCO on TG
LHR-CPH on RG



14 year airliners.net vet! 2000-2013
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
China Eastern Traffic Rights KMG-DAC Leg? posted Tue Apr 11 2006 15:28:40 by 777way
SQ MAN-ZRH Bookable - Any Others Similar? posted Sun Mar 20 2005 14:57:58 by UK_Dispatcher
AC - Any Unused Traffic Rights? posted Sun Jan 23 2005 08:55:26 by Tennisace
SQ/MH/TG China-USA Traffic Rights posted Wed Nov 24 2004 12:29:28 by KEno
Foreign Airline With US Domestic Traffic Rights? posted Mon Oct 11 2004 19:28:25 by BG001
Europe-Dubai Traffic Rights posted Fri Aug 13 2004 10:41:00 by FLY777UAL
Traffic Rights From London - Australia/Africa posted Sat Jul 17 2004 14:47:31 by Sbe727
Traffic Rights Between SCL/EZE/MAD posted Mon Mar 29 2004 04:49:57 by Anxebla
BKK-SIN Traffic Rights posted Mon Feb 23 2004 20:15:13 by Shilla
BMed: Traffic Rights On One-stop Flights posted Fri Jan 23 2004 18:14:15 by Pe@rson