Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
IAD-NRT On UAL  
User currently offlineCjuniel From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 146 posts, RR: 1
Posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 4523 times:

The rumor mill at Dulles has United taking over ANA's daily IAD-NRT flight due to the fact that United is dropping a Hawaii-Japan frequency and ANA adding one. In addition, (and this is ALL hearsay right now), there are rumors that United will end their JFK-NRT flight. Has anyone else heard anything to this effect?

54 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineWidebodyphotog From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 917 posts, RR: 67
Reply 1, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4432 times:

Whoever told you this is a fool and has no idea of what they are talking about. This statement is so far out of the realm of possibility and is simply preposterous

-widebodyphotog



If you know what's really going on then you'll know what to do
User currently offlineMalaysia From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 3316 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4399 times:

GOD I HOPE NOT!

cause I can fly aNA free from IAD and I dont want to lose my window to NRT from IAD, cause nothing with UA



There Are Those Who Believe That There May Yet Be Other Airlines Who Even Now Fight To Survive Beyond The Heavens
User currently offlineEyesinthesky From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 90 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4389 times:

Its not gonna happen!!


User currently offlineRoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9378 posts, RR: 52
Reply 4, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4368 times:

Lets provide some reasons for why UA wouldn't pick up the service over ANA rather than just flaming the poster with no better of an argument than he presented in the first place. I am actually curious why ANA flies the route, and there is no chance that UA would. An explanation would be nice if anyone knows or conjectures something.

[Edited 2005-01-13 05:14:23]


If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9107 posts, RR: 15
Reply 5, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4327 times:

NRT-JFK is a CASH COW for UAL. Though UAL is not very strong at JFK, JFK is an important destination for UAL. I doubt they will end it in favour of IAD-NRT.

User currently offlineEyesinthesky From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 90 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4311 times:

ANA is very proud of its service to DC, and I really do not think they are going to give that up. Why is UA unable to just add service to NRT from IAD without (taking over) the route from ANA?

(.)(.)
EyEs


User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9107 posts, RR: 15
Reply 7, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4304 times:

They can apply for such a flight

User currently offlineBoiler Special From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 135 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 4261 times:

IAD-NRT will not happen any time soon with UA metal. The 2nd HNL-NRT is going to LAX-NRT #2 starting in June.

As for JFK-NRT, there will be many many other flights dropped before JFK-NRT even gets mentioned. It is strategically important to be in the New York market out of Japan to support the rest of the network.


User currently offlineDCAYOW From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 591 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 4241 times:


The ANA IAD-NRT has performed well for NH over the years. The route has been around since the 1980s. In fact, right after 9/11 NH started doing IAD-ORD-NRT and quickly changed Dulles back to nonstop - dropping ORD from their schedule altogether. Rumor was the Japanese Govt (Ministry of Foreign Affairs) wanted the route restored - government traffic on it is sizable given the relationship.

Last full year load factors were in the high 70s. Fares comparable (if not a bit higher than out of JFK per OD1) and significantly higher versus EWR.

They have had trouble at times with the UA feeders at IAD - proper authorizations etc. I don't know if UA plans to replace NH on the route - nothing surprises me anymore - UA transfered the Latin America routes to IAD and now are performing temporary ops on behalf of SK to CPH - so I guess it could happen.



Retorne ao céu...
User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24325 posts, RR: 47
Reply 10, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 4199 times:

While UA's JFK-NRT route is not a looser, it certainly is no "Cash Cow" for United. In reality the JFK routes is one of the weaker Japan routes for the carrier, hence the need to operate smaller B777 on the route versus previously operated B744s. The JFK-NRT routes has suffered increasingly over the years from competition, especially with American entering the market with its own daily nonstop. United is simply weaker in the New York market compared to AA.

Overall UA could benefit by swapping the route over to IAD, as it could also channel connecting feed for the route, something it cannot do at JFK were it must rely solely on NY O&D traffic.

United has done extremely well with its swap of South America service from JFK to IAD with both load factors and revenue having increased substantially over the last 3 years.




From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineCjuniel From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 146 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 4087 times:

Laxintl,


I was thinking the same thing regarding the cash cow statement. We have been checking the loads out of JFK to NRT for a while now and these planes fly out half full at best. There are days in the summer when the planes actually go out full, but it isn't the RULE, as is the case out of Chicago and San Francisco. There are at least 4 daily flights between New York and Tokyo, and most of that is O&D traffic as nobody really has feeder traffic on that route. Further, United can benefit from feeder traffic on UAX at Dulles to fill the flight, because while there is feeder traffic on the flight, quite a bit of the traffic on the IAD-NRT route is O&D, with United feeding much of its traffic through Chicago and San Francisco (routes that ROUTINELY have SOLD OUT double daily flights to Tokyo). Many of you think its preposterous but many managers at Dulles think its not a matter of IF but a matter of WHEN. We will see what happens. Don't shoot me though, I am just the messenger and wanted to know if anyone else had heard the rumors.



User currently offlineUnited_Fan From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 7387 posts, RR: 8
Reply 12, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 1 day ago) and read 4014 times:

Every time I went thru IAD it was a nice trat to see the ANA 744,later a 772. I also read that it may be upgraded to a 773ER.

Still amazes me that a twin can make IAD-Tokyo.



'Empathy was yesterday...Today, you're wasting my Mother-F'ing time' - Heat.
User currently offlineN79969 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 1 day ago) and read 3998 times:

It would not surprise me that much if UA dropped the JFK-NRT flight. It used to be a 747-400 and I believe it is now a 777 flight. If you take into consideration that the route is operated by Northwest, JAL, and ANA, there is quite a bit of capacity. I think I may be omitting American or Delta from the list as well but am not sure. Also Continental flies from Newark as all of you surely know. Since the competition is fierce as it is, UA may find a better use for that triple-7 elsewhere.

I have no idea about ANA's plans though. Even though they are United's alliance partner, that does not oblige them to sacrfice own-company profits to help an ally.


User currently offlineBobnwa From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 6346 posts, RR: 9
Reply 14, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 1 day ago) and read 3977 times:

UnitedAirline,
NRT-JFK is a CASH COW for UAL

Can you give us any numbers to back that up? Also the term "cash cow" has been used to death.


User currently offlineAa777jr From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 1 day ago) and read 3971 times:

While UA's JFK-NRT route is not a looser, it certainly is no "Cash Cow" for United

They compete with AA#167, it's not that money of a route for UA.

Regards,
AA777jr


User currently offlineBobnwa From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 6346 posts, RR: 9
Reply 16, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 3950 times:

AA is not the major player in the JFK-NRT market. They compete with ANA, JAL,UAL and NWA. DAL has dropped out. The market is not a "cash cow" for any of them!!

JFK-NRT also competes with EWR-NRT.



User currently offlineTokyoNarita From Palau, joined Aug 2003, 570 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 3944 times:

They compete with AA#167, it's not that money of a route for UA.

It's not so much because of AA167. It's because JAL is almost double daily and ANA is also there daily. All the big money goes there.

TokyoNarita

[Edited 2005-01-13 15:34:38]

User currently offlineAF022 From France, joined Dec 2003, 2135 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 3893 times:

i would agree with BOILER SPECIAL that even if UA's JFKNRT is not regularly full, it is important to fill out the network from Japan, to offer a full option of destinations from NRT - HNL, JFK, ORD, LAX, SEA, SFO, plus destinations in Asia

this may also be why AA entered the market, to offer a wider range of options from JFK.

i'm surprised that notes above indicate that JL, NH and NW are strong competitors on the route. i thought NW had a lousy reputation. how is NW doing on the route?

af022


User currently offlineNWAFA From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 1893 posts, RR: 16
Reply 19, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 3852 times:

Hi AF022,

NWA goes out full or almost full every day on JFK-NRT. In addition the cargo is packed on that bird.

JFK-NRT does VERY VERY well.



THANK YOU FOR FLYING NORTHWEST AIRLINES, WE TRULY APPRECIATE YOUR BUSINESS!
User currently offlineBobnwa From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 6346 posts, RR: 9
Reply 20, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 3845 times:

AF002,
I thought NW had a lousy reputation. How is NW doing on the route

Care to elaborate on the first statement? NW has been flying the route longer than any of its competitors, so I guess it must be doing OK! The flight is booked at 76% for the next 5 days with business class booked at over 90%.

But I repeat, it is not a "cash cow" for any of them


User currently offlineWidebodyphotog From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 917 posts, RR: 67
Reply 21, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 3822 times:

Many of you think its preposterous but many managers at Dulles think its not a matter of IF but a matter of WHEN. We will see what happens. Don't shoot me though, I am just the messenger and wanted to know if anyone else had heard the rumors.

I'm not going to shoot you, but I have to completely disagree with any assertion that ANA will simply give up NRT-IAD-NRT. In the near-long term NH plans to strengthen it's NA presence, and profitability, particularly in IAD, SFO and JFK. Within the next 15 months ANA will start 777-300ER service to JFK and/or IAD and possibly add frequency to SFO. The Bread and butter customers of ANA, first and business class passengers, simply will not accept United's lower level of service and would pick JAL out of JFK rather than take UA. Also cargo revenue is a very lucrative proposition for NH especially on the inbound flight from NRT where it is often 50% of the total revenues for the segment. NRT-IAD is the 1st or 2nd most profitable international route for NH. What possible incentive could UA provide them for giving it up? And as far as load factors go, NH load factor out of IAD ihas been much higher than 70% through the first 3q of fiscal 2004 and the JFK-NRT flight is doing a lot better than "half full".

I really hate to hear unfounded rumors like this with nothing to back them up. Who cares what other managers at IAD think about the situation of airlines they don't run. The ANA management does not have any plans to fold up the tent anytime soon.

-widebodyphotog



If you know what's really going on then you'll know what to do
User currently offlineAF022 From France, joined Dec 2003, 2135 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 3805 times:

some statistics from DOT, based on Jan-Jun 2004:

JFK-JAPAN
AA 73.8% LF, 220.0 seats/day
JL 74.6% LF, 459.3 seats/day
NH 76.9% LF, 288.4 seats/day
NW 88.0% LF, 396.4 seats/day
UA 77.4% LF, 262.9 seats/day

IAD-JAPAN
NH 80.6% LF, 232.4 seats/day

EWR-JAPAN
CO 75.9% LF, 280.7 seats/day

ORD-JAPAN
AA 79.1% LF, 220.3 seats/day
JL 76.6% LF, 334.6 seats/day
UA 87.3% LF, 637.2 seats/day

SFO-JAPAN
JL 78.9% LF, 330.2 seats/day
NH 78.8% LF, 232.9 seats/day
NW 84.0% LF, 265.0 seats/day
UA 88.7% LF, 951.8 seats/day

af022


User currently offlineKkfla737 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 1033 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 3792 times:

ANA has flown IAD-NRT since the mid 1980s- in fact IRC IAD was their first US destination. The flight did well without any UA feed for years. (The flight was fed by a single codeshare US Air domestic flight from Orlando to Dulles). I doubt ANA would give up this flight.

User currently offlineCx750 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 155 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 3788 times:

I don't think any of the US carriers do particularly well on JFK-NRT. A flight can be full (as in the case for NWA) but yield is key to the performance. It would be very difficult for either NWA or UA to make money on JFK-NRT year round, these routes are in place to keep JFK on the network.

AA/CO have enough feed and the strong O&D market to do well, but I believe the Japanese carriers probably make the most of the route.

As for NH increasing US service, I would see them adding capacity to non UA hub cities only - to take advantage of point of sale strength - UA has the advantage at its hubs (IAD is a legacy route, and it would be difficult to convince NH to give it up for UA).


25 RoseFlyer : Cx750, I am trying to understand your logic here. New York is one of the highest yielding markets in the entire world. Demand for premium travel is mu
26 Flyua : Admittedly, my information is... ohh, only five years old and from two UAL COOs ago, but there had been rumors of United dropping JFK-NRT back in 1999
27 Cjuniel : Widebodyphotog, A rumor is something that can be true or untrue. I am not going to divulge what I have heard and seen to confirm that this rumor may i
28 Cx750 : RoseFlyer, You are correct about NY's large O/D base as well as the yields, however when you factor in KE, OZ, CI, CA, the yields drop significantly t
29 Rjpieces : It would be very difficult for either NWA or UA to make money on JFK-NRT year round, these routes are in place to keep JFK on the network. Ummmmm, ha
30 Cx750 : Rjpieces, Premium pax will stay with the alliance of choice, which for NY is oneworld and skyteam. Oneworld flyers can fly JFK-HKG can nonstop on CX o
31 Ramprat74 : UA actually has more seats on the JFK-NRT route with a 777, then it did with the 747-400. UA used the expanded business class configuration on that ro
32 Gigneil : Huh? The expanded business class 747 has 260 economy seats. N
33 STT757 : "In terms of premium seats and connection opportunies, UA and NW win over AA and CO, hands down." CO's relationship with NWA helps them realize the sa
34 Widebodyphotog : I don't need time to tell what will happen in regards to this rumor. NH is not going anywhere as far as IAD is concerned. And as far as the relative s
35 Ramprat74 : Huh? The expanded business class 747 has 260 economy seats. N I don't know what 747 you are talking about? We had a few 400's that had 124 business se
36 TokyoNarita : We had a few 400's that had 124 business seats and about 90 economy seats. I do remember UA used to have expanded premium seating configuration a few
37 Laxintl : UAL indeed had a premium B747 configuration. It was configured as F36C123Y142. As of 1999, there were 6 -400s in such a configuration. In addition UA
38 UA772IAD : UA is not dropping frequency between Japan and HI, that is a huge market for them... as Hawaii is the one of the top travel getaways for the Japanese,
39 Gigneil : IAD has signs for Korean Air, but I've never seen one of their jets here. I see it pretty much every day. Its a 744. N
40 Malaysia : Korean brought in a 747-300 also today, that was rare
41 N1120a : >UA used the expanded business class configuration on that route
42 Carpethead : I doubt UA will take-over NHfs NRT-IAD service but an additional frequency cannot be ruled out. There is a rumor that NH will re-start NRT-ORD servi
43 Gigneil : Korean brought in a 747-300 also today, that was rare Was it a cargo plane? They only have the one pax model. N
44 Ny-jfk-lga : Actually, AA would be the only loser on JFK>NRT route. Besides all the NRT connection that UA & NW have @ NRT, those two carriers also have big allian
45 StevenUhl777 : Hmmm....interesting arguments both ways. UA has been getting their asses kicked in the NY area for a while now, and have wisely reduced their flights
46 Gigneil : The EWR route competes with JFK, so there's lot of competition for the route. N
47 NoMoreRJs : I've heard the rumor about NH starting ORD when the 773s arrive as a 772 will be flown ORD-NRT. As AF022 points out, load factors on ORD-NRT are stron
48 WIDEBODYPHOTOG : Korean brought in a 747-300 also today, that was rare It was a diversion from JFK, a freighter. -widebodyphotog
49 AF022 : exhaustive summary, jan-jun2004, source DOT ALL GATES TO JAPAN NW 89.4% UA 86.6% DL 85.1% NQ 83.8% CI 80.6% CO 79.9% KE 79.8% AA 79.8% JL 79.1% NH 78.
50 Bobnwa : I don't understand the AA SEA-NRT numbers. How many flights was this? Also your previous numbers kind of dispute the feelings of one member that AA is
51 UA744Flagship : This doesn't make sense. AA pulled out of SEA-NRT a while ago. I don't think you analyzed the T-100s right.
52 AF022 : the seanrt numbers on AA were for a miniscule number of flights - inconsquential, really, but they popped up for the first six months of 2004. af022
53 StevenUhl777 : Thanks, AF022! It would be interesting to see July-Dec. #'s for Seattle, which would exclude AA, and then again for Jan-June '05, which would be an ev
54 MAH4546 : Actually, AA would be the only loser on JFK>NRT route. Besides all the NRT connection that UA & NW have @ NRT, those two carriers also have big allian
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Service On IAD - SFO On UA Nonstop posted Wed Oct 18 2006 18:51:31 by Eastern023
UA Flight #946 IAD-AMS On Friday 10/6. posted Thu Oct 5 2006 07:05:14 by USAF757300
UA IAD-NRT Rumors posted Sat May 27 2006 06:00:28 by Ualcsr
NWA27 SFO-NRT On Feb 18 posted Sun Feb 19 2006 07:00:04 by 3201
Court Approves Flyi Sale Of IAD Lease To UAL posted Thu Feb 2 2006 17:39:15 by Goodmanr
Advice On UAL $100 Change Fee? posted Sun Dec 25 2005 07:02:02 by Swank300
USAir IAD-ORD On 11/27.. Diversion to IND posted Tue Nov 29 2005 01:15:56 by Joness0154
Near Collision On UAL 406? posted Sun Nov 20 2005 02:23:16 by Symphonik
New Paint On A UAL A320 posted Fri Sep 2 2005 12:16:20 by UAcosCS
Delay Of SQ11 At NRT On 10/07/2005 posted Sun Jul 10 2005 13:23:59 by 9V-SPJ