Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
America West Applies For LAX-MEX  
User currently onlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32604 posts, RR: 72
Posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3490 times:

America West has joined American Airlines, Alaska Airlines, and Continental Airlines in applying for Los Angeles-Mexico City service. Only one airline will get the route authority, possible since Delta is ending service on the route this month:

http://dms.dot.gov/search/document.cfm?documentid=311224&docketid=20096


a.
14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJuventus From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 2835 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3402 times:

That's a pitty that only one airline will get this route. This route can support any number of flights. I think that in a couple of years, CO will have at least 15 Mexican destinations from LAX.

User currently offlineRoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9495 posts, RR: 52
Reply 2, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3402 times:

Wow even more competition. I am really curious to see who will get it. AS has a little hub to Mexico going from LAX, and really started a trend of offering more LAX-Mexico service, but all of AS' routes are to leisure destinations. HP and CO are relative new comers, so it will be interesting to see who gets it.


If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineN1120a From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26361 posts, RR: 76
Reply 3, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3381 times:

>but all of AS' routes are to leisure destinations.<

I would not consider GDL a tourist destination. Perhaps a VFR destination on one hand, but it is also one of the biggest business cities in Mexico

>HP and CO are relative newcomers, so it will be interesting to see who gets it.<

Um, an 80 year old airline and a 23 year old airline are really not newcomers, and both have served LAX for a very long time, CO longer than AS. Both have a presence in Mexico, with CO serving more cities than any other US carrier. Both have a presence at LAX as well, though mostly hub flights.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineKkfla737 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 1033 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3357 times:

>HP and CO are relative newcomers, so it will be interesting to see who gets it.

Prior to CO's bankrupcy and the Frank Lorenzo era in the 1980s, Continetal was one of LAXs largest carriers. While they have not been a player in the market for sometime now, they do have traditional ties to the area, and I'm glad since they are healthier than most legacy carriers that they seem to be making a push back into LAX.



User currently onlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13511 posts, RR: 62
Reply 5, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 3341 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I'll always wish America West luck since my girlfriend works for them, but HP has a snowball's chance in hell of getting this route.

Why?

  • They already serve MEX from their PHX hub

  • They have precisely zip to offer for connections that they can't already do via PHX

  • AS and AA offer much more connectivity at LAX





  • "In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
    User currently offlineRoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9495 posts, RR: 52
    Reply 6, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 3327 times:

    Ok, I take what I said back, but CO and HP have not served LAX-Mexico routes for very long. They may have in the past, but as of now, their primary hubs serve as the points of origin for their Mexico flights. They just recently are adding up more flights out of LAX to Mexico. I have never really understood AA at LAX. They seem to have an interesting array of destinations from LAX and kind of compete with UA.


    If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
    User currently offlineKkfla737 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 1033 posts, RR: 1
    Reply 7, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 3283 times:

    I have never really understood AA at LAX.


    Neither do I. They seem to have no plan and just a hodgepodge of destinations in different geographic areas. They have also started and stopped service to many odd destinations from LAX the last few years.


    User currently offlineAaway From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 1521 posts, RR: 14
    Reply 8, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 3124 times:

    "I have never really understood AA at LAX."

    LAX has always been a stong O/D performer for AA. The purchase of Reno Air was an attempt to not only bolster it's position in traditionally stong West Coast O/D markets, but to add a level of connectivity that previously had been lacking.
    The original goal was to (1) tie the (then) existing long-haul and hub services, to (b) a fairly broad slate of short-haul (AA mainline and Eagle) services, and (c) expand international services through it's own and codehare flying. If you look at a timetable, AA has more international codeshare destinations @ LAX than any other hub or gateway.
    Creating this network would be an attractive selling point for business travelers, shippers, corporate travel contracts, and partner carriers in Los Angeles and abroad. Plus, AA felt compelled to stanch the diversion of market share to UA as a result of UA's buildup at LAX (and SFO, for that matter).
    Unfortunately, post 9/11/01 made a lot of the short-haul flying on the West Coast untenable. AA's CASM vs. yields derived, the reduction in business travel (individuals as well as corporate), and fewer higher yielding pax connecting from international long haul spelled the end of the short haul, AA mainline element in the connectivity equation.
    What we see today is a service pattern that has transitioned back to it's O/D emphasis - but largely avoiding O/D's with a strong LCC element. Even if UA were to disappear, I believe AA would resume most of the dropped short-haul (OAK, PHX, et al) with AA Eagle at most.



    With a choice between changing one's mind & proving there's no need to do so, most everyone gets busy on the proof.
    User currently offlineLaca773 From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 4002 posts, RR: 2
    Reply 9, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 3077 times:
    Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

    HP on this route doesn't make much since. They do have some services out of LAX but it's all on the CR9's with their express partner. What would they use on this trip? 319?

    AA only has service to SJD from LAX at this point in addition to their codeshares with MX. I feel they should have to build up their presence there prior to flying MEX. They used to go to GDL on an overnight flight but that was cut.

    CO does have an extensive route system to Mexico, and now that they have added service to LAX in addition to all their service out of IAH, perhaps they are trying to build LAX back up? Anyone have any thoughts on this?

    Personally, I'd like to see AS get this route!! I have a friend that works for them, and they all have been wanting this for a very long time as well as full fair paying passengers who do go to GDL and take long weekends to their resort destinations. I think it will be a great fit for them to pick this up, and now they are code sharing with DL as well. They have a very extensive route network to Mexico out of LAX: SJD, MZT, PVR, IXTAPA, [airport code?], MANAZNIILO [airport code?], CUN, GDL. I believe they also just added weekend trips to Loreto? I feel they would also offer full inflight service on this route too [full meals instead of snacks].


    User currently offlineAs739x From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6091 posts, RR: 24
    Reply 10, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 3028 times:

    Laca... Also don't forget we are starting Loreto from Los Angeles. We fill be serving 8 city's in Mexico, not including if we get the MEX. Alaska has 2 chances to get this actually. If AA gets the flight then we can codeshare on the route.

    Anyone know when they would announce the carrier that is awarded the route?

    ASSFO



    "Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
    User currently onlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13511 posts, RR: 62
    Reply 11, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 3018 times:
    Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

    Alaska has 2 chances to get this actually. If AA gets the flight then we can codeshare on the route.

    Technically three, since CO also codeshares with AS - so if it's awarded to CO, AS can still codeshare on it.

    AS definitely makes the most sense though. They offer far greater connectivity at LAX than HP, AA or CO do, and since AS codeshares with BOTH AA and CO, those carriers still benefit from AS being awarded LAX-MEX.

    If awarded this service, Alaska's Mexico routes will be:

    LAX-SJD
    LAX-PVR
    LAX-MZT
    LAX-GDL
    LAX-ZIH
    LAX-ZLO
    LAX-CUN
    LAX-LTO
    LAX-MEX

    Nonstop service out of LAX on AS metal alone would be (not counting other connecting opportunities on QX from LAX/SEA/PDX):

    LAX-SEA
    LAX-SFO
    LAX-PDX
    LAX-DCA
    LAX-ANC
    LAX-RNO

    And that's before even taking AS codeshares to AA and CO's system into consideration, with LAX-MIA, LAX-IAH, LAX-DFW, and LAX-ORD nonstops plus connection to all their points beyond.




    "In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
    User currently offlineN1120a From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26361 posts, RR: 76
    Reply 12, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2989 times:

    >I have never really understood AA at LAX. They seem to have an interesting array of destinations from LAX and kind of compete with UA.<

    AA also has a loyal FF base in LA, particularly in the entertainment industry. In fact, many people in LA have UA, AA and WN FF memberships. They rely on strong O&D and very, very good Trans-con frequency at the airport, as well as some international.

    >They offer far greater connectivity at LAX than HP, AA or CO do<

    HP and CO, yes, AA no. AA has a far bigger operation at LAX than AS, and that does not even include Eagle Flight



    Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
    User currently onlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13511 posts, RR: 62
    Reply 13, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2986 times:
    Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

    HP and CO, yes, AA no. AA has a far bigger operation at LAX than AS, and that does not even include Eagle Flight

    Now consider that the vast majority of AA's lift to/from LAX are JFK nonstops, and that AS codeshares to every AA Eagle flight out of LAX and suddenly the picture looks a lot different.



    "In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
    User currently offlineFlyboyaz From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
    Reply 14, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2850 times:

    I would think LAX would have a lot of O&D pax to MEX. I wasn't suprised to learn that HP bid for it. Our LAX flights do very well. The new nonstop to ACA is doing very well so far.

    Top Of Page
    Forum Index

    This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

    Printer friendly format

    Similar topics:More similar topics...
    US Airways/America West Apply For LAX-SJD posted Tue Oct 18 2005 20:11:00 by NKMCO
    Mesa Air/America West Apply For LAX-PVR posted Thu Dec 18 2003 00:30:05 by MAH4546
    America West Applies For Federal Loan posted Tue Nov 13 2001 23:50:36 by AWA22
    AeroMexico Applies For CLE-MEX posted Tue Jan 3 2006 23:58:18 by MAH4546
    Coex Applies For LAX-SJD posted Tue Oct 18 2005 16:37:31 by BigGSFO
    Delta Applies For LAX-CUN posted Thu Sep 8 2005 05:03:14 by MAH4546
    UA Applies For LAX-CUN posted Fri Sep 2 2005 20:30:24 by MAH4546
    Alaska 4th Airline To Apply For LAX-MEX posted Fri Jan 14 2005 09:59:47 by Trvlr
    The Race Is On: AA And CO Apply For LAX-MEX posted Fri Jan 7 2005 22:06:17 by MAH4546
    North American Applies For OAK-MEX/CUN posted Fri Sep 3 2004 21:20:31 by MAH4546