GKirk From United Kingdom (Scotland), joined Jun 2000, 23838 posts, RR: 69 Reply 1, posted (4 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 8308 times:
Horrendous, simply horrid
When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
Gilesdavies From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2260 posts, RR: 2 Reply 5, posted (4 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 8193 times:
How many passengers are they fitting on this baby in a 28" configuration?
The 747-300's held about 500 passengers in an all Y configuration.
GKirk From United Kingdom (Scotland), joined Jun 2000, 23838 posts, RR: 69 Reply 12, posted (4 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 8042 times:
The flying blue condom...extra large. What an offence to the eye! The B747-400 does not deserve that!
Exactly....it should have been done to an A340 instead
When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
ThomasCook From United Kingdom (England), joined Aug 2004, 557 posts, RR: 13 Reply 14, posted (4 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 8000 times:
Hi,
That looks awful! Worse then Thomsonfly.com even! I think it would better or at least less of an eyesore if it hadn't received '.fr' titles?
Mhodgson From United Kingdom (England), joined Dec 2002, 4970 posts, RR: 40 Reply 16, posted (4 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 7893 times:
It isn't on there any more
No trees were harmed by this message. However, several million electrons were terribly inconvenienced
United_fan From United States, joined Nov 2000, 5808 posts, RR: 11 Reply 19, posted (4 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 7667 times:
The pic doesn't work here,either......
Never rat on your friends,and always keep your mouth shut-Goodfellas.
Ilsapproach From United States, joined Aug 2004, 410 posts, RR: 0 Reply 20, posted (4 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 7577 times:
Cant wait to see 1000's of pics of it SXM on the DB
A388 From Netherlands Antilles, joined May 2001, 5785 posts, RR: 14 Reply 21, posted (4 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 7430 times:
Am I the only one who can't see the photo? When I click on the link, it takes me to a french forum with no link to a photo...
28 Ua777222: Same here BAtripleseven, Can anyone provide a link that actually has a picture? Thanks again. Ua777222
29 By738: At the bottom of this forum post ( the first few dont work) http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=37248 With thanks to the original poster
30 Solnabo: Jeeehhh, that almost looks like a KLM 747! Micke/SE
31 Ohlbu: Oh my God, that red-on-blue is just horrible. What a disgrace to bring that thing to SXM!
32 A388: I think I just have to get used to it. When will it be rolled out the hangar from KLM and/or when will it depart? I would like to take pictures of it,
33 Laxintl: Cant tell which tail number this happens to be, however F-GTUI has been painted for a bit over a week. Out in the daytime sunshine, it does not look a
34 Dogfighter2111: I wasn't able to see the ones By738 posted, so here's some more. http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showpost.php?p=568306&postcount=6 Dog
35 Alcregular: Oh My God, what did the aircrft do to deserve this? This is just hiddeous, Tui have lost the plot on this one. Fair enough, on little 737's, but a who
36 DeltaWings: As I see, just about every living beeing in this world hates the thing. Doesn't TUI get the hint? ~DeltaWings
37 Richierich: Wow - that is quite the looker (not!) Ugly font (what is it? Sans Serif 12000-point?) and colors that don't go well together. Maybe their motive is to
38 MEL: looks terrible. Normal Corsair would've been much better.[Edited 2005-01-15 21:48:31]
39 Airxliban: i agree that normal corsair would have been better, but i'll reserve further judgment until a picture of the entire thing comes online.
40 FRAspotter: For right now, you can only see part of the plane due to the paper and plastic covering. Once all that comes off, it will look much better. Cheers...
42 By738: I can still see them on both the links above.
43 Lamyl_hhlco: why did they do that for?? it's ewwwww not really creative, i like the former colour scheme better...
44 Jofa: Whom in their right mind put red text on blue background.
45 KWI: All I have to say is that I'm saddened to see such a majestic airliner look like this. Instead of the Queen of the Skies, she looks like the Clown of
47 Capri: I think the reason by painting like this is to get simply attention and guess what? it did As you all complain about the painting, Corsair got everyon
48 FCKC: Zweed Totally right. Blame TUI , NOT Corsair. Every people at this friendly airline Corsair are blased with TUI. Not only they do not invest in Corsai
49 777STL: "What a pitty, who paints aircraft babyblue??" Korean and KLM come to mind. It is an ugly color though, ick. -77
50 Ahlfors: Well, it is a good marketing tactic. The only reason to want to be inside a 587 seat 744 is to NOT HAVE TO LOOK AT THAT MONSTROSITY. That said, anyone
51 San747: A. I've never liked the TUI colors, and many of its airlines former colors were better... B. That includes Corsair. Their colors, the SUN, SEA, and SE
52 FCKC: Ahlfors This monstruosity was supposed to arrive at Orly in the middle of last week. Up to today , it's not arrived. It was also supposed to enter ser