Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Chautauqua Aircraft Damage In ORD  
User currently offlineUAL Bagsmasher From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2146 posts, RR: 10
Posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3477 times:

Last night, a ramper decided to drive a tug underneath N973RP in ORD. Unfortunately, the throttle guard on the tug sliced a 5 foot long gash from one side of the aircraft to the other. It looks like someone took a Skilsaw and chopped right through the fuselage. It's actually a nice clean cut, but from the looks of it, the internal structure was damaged as well. It's not a pretty site.

18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBALandorLivery From UK - England, joined Jan 2005, 360 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3453 times:

Unfortunately it's another case of ground personnel damaging an aircraft. These incidents appear to happen all to often. Although I don't know the exact circumstances, I think that ground should be more careful because an incident like this can put an aircraft out of action, and cause an operational headache.

However I realise it was most certainly an accident and I am NOT suggesting that ground crew are irrisponsible in any way.


User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 2, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 3374 times:

Ouch....That is one of their 'blue tails' and former Axon Airlines aircraft. It's sad to say events like this happen way too often.


"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineUAL Bagsmasher From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2146 posts, RR: 10
Reply 3, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 3092 times:

Who is/was Axon Airlines? Where did they fly?

User currently offlineMojo89 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 123 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 3077 times:

Actually it wasn't a tug. It was a belt loader.


When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. -Dr. Hunter S. Thompson
User currently offlineERJ170 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 6756 posts, RR: 17
Reply 5, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3052 times:

Speaking of Chautauqua..

Any inside info of the DL routes they will handle with the 170? And when are the 170s coming online for DLConn?



Aiming High and going far..
User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 6, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3047 times:

A short lived operator in Greece.


"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineUSrampleadSTL From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 102 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3019 times:

BALandorLivery: There wasn't anything to be careful about here, if it's true that the ramper drove the beltloader under the plane, he was just being absolutely 100% stupid. You're right, some accidents that happen are a result of carelessness, like denting the fuselage with a lav or catering truck, or bumping an engine with a beltloader... but driving a beltloader under the plane? I can only imagine what CHQ is going to do to him (well, besides fire him). All that happens in case of an accident is you have to go for a drug test and you're on paid suspension until the results come back.


02C14MARPHLFCOMM1 - FLY THE FLAG!
User currently offlineUAL Bagsmasher From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2146 posts, RR: 10
Reply 8, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 2816 times:

LOL....I cant believe I typed Tug not beltloader. That's what just coming off 3rd shift does to ya Big grin Anyway, the plane was in our hangar all last night getting some major sheet metal work done. They are working on it around the clock just to ferry it for a permanent repair. They had to put doublers on quite a few stringers, and who knows what else. I didn't have much time to look as I was changing out an IDG.

User currently offlineUAL Bagsmasher From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2146 posts, RR: 10
Reply 9, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2768 times:

Actually, it was a ZW ramper, since ZW does all the UAX ground handling in ORD.

User currently offlineUALramperORD From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2691 times:

Well, I guess that's what you get when you pay rampers 8.50 an hour. I worked Express for a while at ORD while I was furloughed and needless to say I was turning in my badge 2 weeks later. I hear from friends who are supervisors at ZW that it is a horse shi* operation with lay workers. (I dont speak myself, just telling you what I heard, so any ZW employees dont jump down my throat.)

User currently offlineAirportugal310 From Palau, joined Apr 2004, 3584 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2636 times:

Actually working on the ramp, I am SO surprised that there are not more accidents with aircraft and with other things than there presently are...

Bruno
BOS



I sell airplanes and airplane accessories
User currently offlineLindy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2589 times:

Here it is at DCA

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Rafal Szczypek



Rafal


User currently offlineATWZW170 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 904 posts, RR: 3
Reply 13, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 2503 times:

Just wondering UALramper, how much does mainline UA pay it's rampers to start...and $8.50 isn't what they start at for ZW ramp, it's more like $9.50. And if UA wouldn't come to us and tell us to cut more costs, maybe we could get better people on the ramp. Keep in mind that we took over the entire Express operation and have people with maybe a year or less experience, with new folks coming on every month...with what UA has given us to work with, I'd say we are doing a DAMN fine job.


Success is getting what you want...happiness is liking what you get
User currently offlineAgrayson514 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 396 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 2476 times:

I wonder if this means they'll paint it now...


Give a little bit...
User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 15, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 2441 times:

I wonder if this means they'll paint it now...

I'd say no. The people I have talked with at CHQ love these aircraft in the blue tail as they can fly any line. It may fly Delta in the morning, American at noon and USAirways at night. I think they have two -145's and two -135's in those colors.



"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineUAL Bagsmasher From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2146 posts, RR: 10
Reply 16, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2397 times:

I agree that the ZW ramp/ops side of things at ORD is rather hectic. When we taxi planes over from the hangar in the morning, they give us conflicting gate information, etc. But there are a lot of new employees, and it will take time to get things up to speed. Also, as previously stated, UA's shoestring budget we have to work with isn't helping.

User currently offlinePensacolaguy From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 546 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2354 times:

Since were on the subject of UEX/CHQ.
What flight numbers on the United Airlines timetable indicate CHQ airlines ER4 flights? The timetable says all 7000-7999 flights are Atlantic Coast Airlines. But looking at the timetable ABQ-ORD flight numbers are 7736/7740 and Atlantic Coast Airlines doesn't operated ERJ-170s.


User currently offlineOH-LGA From Denmark, joined Oct 1999, 1436 posts, RR: 19
Reply 18, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2337 times:

Pensacolaguy: Since Atlantic Coast is no longer a United Express carrier, 7000-7999 series flight numbers have been reassigned to current United Express partners. I can't remember the ranges, but Trans States operates using flight numbers 8000-8199 I believe. Mesa operates the lower end of the 7000's (7000-7299 I beleive), with Shuttle America and Chautauqua operating using the rest of the numbers.

Kai



Head in the clouds... yet feet planted firmly on the ground.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
NW Aircraft Damage In MKE posted Fri Jan 7 2005 06:23:09 by AirTran737
NW Aircraft Damage In Storms At MSP posted Thu Jun 26 2003 06:06:36 by PSU.DTW.SCE
Aircraft Stuck On 9R In ORD posted Thu Jan 6 2005 02:48:34 by UAL Bagsmasher
Aircraft Assembly In Saudi? posted Sat Oct 28 2006 20:01:10 by HiJazzey
Aircraft Going In Circles Shortly After Takeoff posted Thu Oct 26 2006 20:18:49 by Quickmover
Short Connection In ORD posted Fri Oct 20 2006 06:11:15 by BPS3458
Crash Pads In ORD posted Sat Oct 14 2006 19:10:01 by Flyboy80
Small Aircraft Crashes In Northern Brazil posted Mon Oct 2 2006 19:39:50 by Antiuser
Light Aircraft Crashes In Snowdonia, North Wales posted Tue Sep 12 2006 23:49:29 by SteveBerch
UA Flights Stopping In ORD - Allowed To Get Off? posted Thu Jul 27 2006 01:07:20 by Aviationwiz