Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AirTran's New 717 Mods?  
User currently offlineBR715-A1-30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 2211 times:

Are AirTran's NEWEST 717s coming off the production line with the new YELLOW/GREEN Luminescent Tape running down the aisle? Or are they coming off the line like the other 717s, with the lights on the side? I have noticed how newer planes and interior mods are installing the tape on the side instead of using traditional lights on the side, or blinking aisle lights... Any details?

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineATL2CDG From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 296 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2187 times:

I'm assuming that you are refering to the escape path lighting...

To my knowledge, all FL 717s are equipped with standard incandescent lighting that runs along the base aircraft right aisle seats. Conversely, the FL 737s are equipped with photoluminescent strips than run along both sides of the aisle at floor-level.



Ignorantia juris neminem excusat.
User currently offlineBR715-A1-30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2124 times:

Yes, the 737 lighting is what I'm talking about... The photoluminescent strips... I know the 717s have the standard incandescent lighting, but examples I have noticed are this

1. Northwest Airlink (Pinnacle) original CRJs came with blinking colored lights on the aisle, but the newer ones have the photoluminescent strips on them per the newest safetycards.

2. ASA/Delta Connection original CRJs came with the same blinking lights, and the CRJ-700s have the photoluminescent strips.

3. Jetsgo has refurbished their MD80s to have the Photoluminescent strips in them

So, I was wondering if their newest 717s will have the new type strips.


User currently offlineGnomon From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2090 times:

Is there an advantage to having one over the other?

User currently offlineATL2CDG From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 296 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2082 times:

Given that the 717 production line is near the end of its days, I doubt Boeing would be interested in investing the tens of thousands of dollars that would be required in order to recertify the cabin of the aircraft with the photoluminescent strips.

On a side note, ASA Inflight has just been informed that all CRJ200 deliveries from this point forward will be equipped with the photoluminescent strips (of the same variety found on the CRJ700).

Lastly, the incandescent escape path lights on the CRJ200s do not blink. The illumination is constant, and the blinking (during the demo) is solely a result of the flight attendant alternating the toggle switch between "on" and "off".



Ignorantia juris neminem excusat.
User currently offlineBR715-A1-30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2064 times:

GNomon, The Photoluminescent strips require less maintenance in terms of electrical work because they do not require any wiring. The Overhead lights "charge" the strips which is why the overhead bins must be closed while the plane is parked at the gate. Some F/As ignore this and the strips are not charged. Hope the FAA is not on a flight like that.

User currently offlineCrosswind From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 2598 posts, RR: 58
Reply 6, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2056 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Given that the 717 production line is near the end of its days, I doubt Boeing would be interested in investing the tens of thousands of dollars that would be required in order to recertify the cabin of the aircraft with the photoluminescent strips.

It is already certified, and has been for several years as far as I'm aware...

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Konstantin von Wedelstaedt


Regards
CROSSWIND


User currently offlineATL2CDG From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 296 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2053 times:

BR715-A1-30:

Actually, the sidewall lights, if luminated to full intensity, along with any ambient sunlight and light from the overhead bin lights (partial obstructed by the overhead bin doors, of course) provide sufficient light to charge the photoluminescent strips. It is simply not feasible to keep the overhead bin doors closed during passenger boarding.

Crosswind:

I respectfully stand corrected. As such, I cannot claim to know what AirTran techops divisions plans on this front in the future. An "updating" to the photoluminescent strips would seem to be a possibility.

[Edited 2005-01-18 23:28:54]


Ignorantia juris neminem excusat.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airtran's New IAD-MCO Flights posted Fri Feb 3 2006 22:08:44 by Quickmover
AirTran New Website posted Wed Jul 27 2005 15:50:07 by ERJ170
Airtran's New 737s posted Sat Dec 4 2004 18:58:02 by Airgeek12
New 717 Order Rumour posted Fri Dec 3 2004 01:52:29 by Yyz717
New 717 And 777 Customers...? posted Thu Jul 22 2004 06:45:22 by FlyABR
AirTran New Livery Question posted Thu Jun 3 2004 16:20:27 by Drerx7
Boeing/AirTran Discussing 717 Future posted Thu May 13 2004 20:01:27 by Ouboy79
18 New 717's? posted Mon Apr 26 2004 17:43:50 by 717fan
AirTran New Colors posted Wed Mar 3 2004 22:39:37 by BR715-A1-30
AirTran New City Vote posted Sun Nov 16 2003 04:01:04 by Micstatic