Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Airport Size  
User currently offlineLongbowPilot From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 577 posts, RR: 4
Posted (9 years 6 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1686 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Can someone please tell me how the A380 will revolutionize the world. After reading the Boeing Journal. I can see where there is a slight chance the A380's might not muster to expectations.

Since I used to work in the airlines I can see how the A380 will benefit the hub - hub system. I agree however that passengers would like more point - point. Granted that you can't Point to Point very well over the oceans, but within countries and continents it is different. If airbus breaks even great, but i truel believe that Airbus will have troubles ahead. Airlines are shifting thier trends and evaluating point to point. Especially American Carriers, Southwest and Jetblue point to points are very well liked. So I know the domestice market in the US will probably never see an A380 not only due to facility immaturity but just the fact that it doesn't fit the trend of what the US public at large usually wants.



12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBALandorLivery From UK - England, joined Jan 2005, 360 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (9 years 6 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1668 times:

I agree, and this shift to point-to-point is why I think the 787 will be very successful.

Not to mention that it will be a more economical replacement for charter carriers who operate the 757/767.

PLEASE NO A vs B WAR, i'm sick n tired of those.


User currently offlineLongbowPilot From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 577 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (9 years 6 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1653 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

This isn't supposed to become an A vs B.. This is supposed to be Fact vs Fact about the market ideas these aircraft will be doing. I believe i have established plenty of room on either side for people to fight for thier respective theories without making this an B vs A war Big grin


User currently offlineBALandorLivery From UK - England, joined Jan 2005, 360 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (9 years 6 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1633 times:

True, but some people are bound to kick off, just trying to make sure it doesn't happen.

Aslo do you think that Emirates need all those A380's or do you think that the Sheiks are doing it partly for pride i.e having bigger planes to show their wealth.


User currently offlineReady4Pushback From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2004, 364 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (9 years 6 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1640 times:

LongbowPilot, I agree with what you have to say, but the growing markets in the world are in Asia now, and I think that is where it will be a success (I mean to say most successful!).

Having said that, I realise that us westerners may like the point-to-point system, but I don't know about the rest of the world. I guess the growing Asian market may in fact like the point-to-point system ultimately as well, and yes I think Airbus will then be in trouble with regards to the A380 program.

I live close to BHX and I remember when AA used to fly to ORD from there every day. The company I worked for loved it - every trip to the US started with the BHX-ORD service, and then on. Businesses love these point-to-point services.


User currently offlineLongbowPilot From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 577 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (9 years 6 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1608 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

If the markey is truely only going to be Asia, than Boeing really isn't going to be threatend by the airbus. Because the aircrat they are producing is going to satisfy the needs of the carriers in the west that are looking for the more efficient way to a destination to build point to point routes.

SO in the end Airbus will have thier market and Boeing will have thiers. Now i truely think I see that they are more or less cornering thier markets and not trying to hostily take over either.. Genius.



User currently offlineOzglobal From France, joined Nov 2004, 2711 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (9 years 6 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1602 times:

It is reductionist to judge the economics of the A380 on the basis of the US market. The US market is overwhelmingly short haul domestic. Many other markets are heavily international long haul (Asia, Australia, Middle East, South Africa and others; Europe being a mix). On the basis of your US argument, the 747 should never have been built and was flawed in its economic conception. It's tremendous and ongoing success shows the US market not to be highly relevant in the question.
To take one example, I travel fairly frequently between Europe and Australia. QF operates up to seven daily 744's between LHR and Australia (BA several as well, not to mention many other carriers). The flight takes around 24 hours. Plus, slots are capped at LHR and I don't believe QF has any more options since they introduced their services to LHR via HKG. Can you imagine an armarda of A319's leaving every half hour taking people to every city in Australia? Now can you see the economics of a larger scale aircraft delivering higher yeild on a very long haul route using the same slot as the 744?
Take another example: SYD or MEL - LAX. People are often showing the number 744's sitting at LAX, waiting to return. Smacks of a route in need of capacity, don't you think?


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Sam Chui






Look at the A380, think outside the US boarders (i.e. where the growth is) and it makes sense.

Ozglobal



When all's said and done, there'll be more said than done.
User currently offlineReady4Pushback From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2004, 364 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (9 years 6 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1585 times:

Are there any American airlines wanting to do that though? I think that would be very different to your original market example that you were talking about - which was JetBlue and Southwest.

I think this would be great - I would love to see both B and A have amazingly successful airliners, and I personally think the best thing for B would be for some of the American airlines to really start to pick up and be in a position to spend.


User currently offlineCodeshare From Poland, joined Sep 2002, 1854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (9 years 6 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1573 times:

Another thing: look how many US carriers use the 747. NW and UA now, from the majors. Also others, I think too (maybe?).

So basically the A380 will be generally used by foreign airlines flying into the US.



How much A is there is Airliners Net ? 0 or nothing ?
User currently offlineLongbowPilot From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 577 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (9 years 6 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1563 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

right and the boeing 7e7 will be more going to the us.



User currently offlineBENNETT123 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 7415 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (9 years 6 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1513 times:


The key issue here is the number of passengers per slot.

If you can match growth of passengers with growth in slots, then the average plane size remains the same. If not, you need bigger planes.

Perhaps US airports have plenty of spare slots.


User currently offlineZKSUJ From New Zealand, joined May 2004, 7084 posts, RR: 12
Reply 11, posted (9 years 6 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1492 times:

Yes I agree. But for routes like SIN-LHR or LHR-LAx or something like that. The A380 will be very handy. I do not think Airbus are aiming for the 380 to be used on point to point, but rather to increase capacity on hub to hubs where airlines may not get extra slots into a certain airport. An example is LHR where slots are hard to come by. The A380 will use only 1 slot but carry nearly one and a half the PAX on a 767 or 777 etc...

User currently offlineReady4Pushback From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2004, 364 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (9 years 6 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1490 times:

Ozglobal: that's a beautiful pic, it's amazing that it's LAX and not SYD or MEL!

LongbowPilot, are there any US airlines that are in a position to spend alot of money on 7e7s? I was there last week, and from the conversations I had, no one was saying anything good about the financial situation of the airlines. I noticed in another post that Continental were having to consider cancelling their order? It's early days for it, and I think it will do well outside of the US anyway - both will - I think the Asian market will go for both the A380 and the 7e7 personally. I would like to see it do well in the leasure market in Europe - one of the charter airlines has already ordered some, haven't they?


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airport Size posted Thu Jan 20 2005 20:21:37 by LongbowPilot
Airport Size Question? posted Sat Dec 29 2001 21:59:24 by Cobra27
Is SFO A Small Intl Airport In Terms Of Size? posted Sun Feb 15 2004 09:30:23 by Apollo13
Most Impressive Mid-Size Airport posted Sun Mar 23 2003 22:11:55 by DeltaASA16
Airport Plans That Never Were-SAN posted Wed Dec 20 2006 19:49:21 by Stirling
Marry X-Mas To All Airport Personal! posted Wed Dec 20 2006 13:18:18 by Zsx81
Employees Jumping The Airport Security Line posted Tue Dec 19 2006 18:50:44 by B777-700
Free Airport Parking For Disabled Vets Etc... posted Mon Dec 18 2006 06:31:33 by Longhornmaniac
East Midlands Airport Renamed posted Sat Dec 16 2006 19:52:28 by Ringway