Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Westjet To Launch 737-600 W/winglets  
User currently offlineCanadaEH From Canada, joined Jul 2003, 1341 posts, RR: 4
Posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 5388 times:

Aviation Partners Boeing Teams up With WestJet to Launch 737-600 Blended Winglet(TM) Program
Monday January 24, 11:41 am ET
Canadian Carrier Saves Fuel and Boosts Route Opportunities with Aviation Partners Boeing(R) Blended Winglet Technology


SEATTLE, Jan. 24 /PRNewswire/ -- WestJet enhanced its position as the low cost and innovation leader in Canadian aviation in 2003 when it became the North American Blended Winglet launch operator for Boeing Next Generation 737-700 series aircraft. Today, WestJet enters the record books again as the inaugural customer for Aviation Partners Boeing's 737-600 Blended Winglet Performance Enhancement Program.

More At:
http://www.aviationpartnersboeing.com


EH.
27 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineBluewave 707 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3152 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 5329 times:

This little blurb from ATWonline.com ...

http://www.atwonline.com/indexfull.cfm?newsid=4930

ETOPS routes? Trans-Atlantic ot Trans-Pacific?



"The best use of your life will be to so live your life, that the use of your life will outlive your life" -- D Severn
User currently offlineN1120a From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26487 posts, RR: 75
Reply 2, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 5326 times:

>ETOPS routes? Trans-Atlantic ot Trans-Pacific?<

Probably not. They probably want them to increase the abysmal efficiency of a shortened narrow-body and make sure they have year-round YUL-YVR range.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineGodBless From Sweden, joined Apr 2000, 2752 posts, RR: 15
Reply 3, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 5259 times:

I heard that the 73G with winglets has too much lift already when empty, so it must be really hard to get the 736 on the ground once it's has winglets...
A buddy of mine, a pilot, told me how he did a position flight with Air Berlin's "Dreamliner" and it just didn't want to get onto the runway.

Max


User currently offlineWJA73G From Canada, joined Jun 2004, 171 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 5059 times:

According to my Father (NG Captain) the -700 is an absolute beast when it is empty.. It performs more like a rocket than an airplane and the -600 will probably be even more outstanding because it is smaller with the same engines!

WJA73G


User currently offlineN1120a From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26487 posts, RR: 75
Reply 5, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 5050 times:

>it is smaller with the same engines!<

Downrated and it is almost as heavy.

>A buddy of mine, a pilot, told me how he did a position flight with Air Berlin's "Dreamliner" and it just didn't want to get onto the runway. <

That is a 738, not 73G



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineAirdolomiti From Germany, joined May 2003, 690 posts, RR: 9
Reply 6, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 5026 times:

>>>A buddy of mine, a pilot, told me how he did a position flight with Air Berlin's "Dreamliner" and it just didn't want to get onto the runway. <

>That is a 738, not 73G

Wrong, AB's Dreamliner is a 73G  Smile/happy/getting dizzy


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Sébastien Glaentzlin



You were probably thinking of FR's Dreamliner which is indeed a 738.


Getting back on topic, a 736 with winglets - talk about a hot rod!! Should be very interesting...

Federico


User currently offlineJean Leloup From Canada, joined Apr 2001, 2116 posts, RR: 19
Reply 7, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 5018 times:

Hmm... I wonder if the timing of this (relatively minor) announcement is intended to partly offset the imminent (in my opinion) announcement of a fourth-quarter loss after almost 30 consecutive quarters of profitability...


Next flight.... who knows.
User currently offlineCanadaEH From Canada, joined Jul 2003, 1341 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 4928 times:

You have got to be kidding me...


EH.
User currently offlineWjv04 From Canada, joined Jun 2001, 584 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 4839 times:

Jean Leloup... umm or not. Even if we do post a loss, I highly doubt that Westjet would use this to offset their announcement.

Quite funny, our crew was talking about this exact topic today just before pushing the flight to San Fran. I personally dont see why the -600 would need winglets. I cant wait tell we get the 600s and 800s!!!
Any ideas on delivery dates.


User currently offlineCanadaEH From Canada, joined Jul 2003, 1341 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 4829 times:

wjv04..

-800's are to be delivered in April, May, and June (three). The first of our -600's are to be delivered in August although from the news release it sounds like it'll be in test flights for Boeing from March-July... so know knows.

I've also heard that our -600's will have the longest range of any NG in the world aside from the BBJ thanks to the increased MTOW.



EH.
User currently offlineWjv04 From Canada, joined Jun 2001, 584 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 4773 times:

Sweet!!!!

CanadaEh, are you finnally gonna tell me what you do, now that im a fellow WestJetter!!!


User currently offlineJean Leloup From Canada, joined Apr 2001, 2116 posts, RR: 19
Reply 12, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 4749 times:

Well, it's not that unusual for a company to post a press release to offset something else, so I do'nt htink my suggestion was all that unreasonable. Take, for instance, Boeing's "roll-out" of one small piece of the 7E7 just five days before Airbus unveiled the A380.

Mind you, in this case, I see it was Aviation Partners that made the press release; Westjet does not have one as of yet.

For what it's worth, I love Westjet, but let's not act as though people are NOT worried about the fourth quarter results! (As well as the next couple after that.) We all know things are getting a little tougher for WS...



Next flight.... who knows.
User currently offlineLymanm From Canada, joined Jan 2001, 1138 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 4734 times:

I thought the 736 was to open up shorter routes where capacity didn't justify the larger airplanes. If so, why make an already clumsily heavy airplane even heavier? The cost savings of the winglets are only felt on much longer stage lengths.

Granted, they would be perfect for YVR-YUL or similar.



buhh bye
User currently offlineCanadaEH From Canada, joined Jul 2003, 1341 posts, RR: 4
Reply 14, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 4725 times:

Our company is pretty tight-lipped about strategic plans for 2005. A decision has yet to be made (or publicly announced) regarding our 737-200 fleet, and rumors abound as to where our 737-600's are going to go (YLW/YEG/YYC-HNL are just one of them). Who knows, but whatever we can do to make these things more efficient I'm all for.

Jean, a lot of people are worried about our quarterly results but I'm more focused on what my company plans on doing to make our company viable for the long-term. It isn't going to be an easy year by any means..



EH.
User currently offlineCanadaEH From Canada, joined Jul 2003, 1341 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 4706 times:

wjv04 send me an email, just click on my name and then 'contact'.


EH.
User currently offlineBO__einG From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 2771 posts, RR: 18
Reply 16, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 4523 times:

A Boeing 737-600 equipped with Winglets, my goodness that would be extremely appealing to the eye. Definetly a first for Boeing to go with something like this.

Will these babies also be equipped with LiveTV like in some of the -700 Fleet?
Uncertain whether that too would be a first in the world.

I remember seeing the hybrid Delta 737-800 back in 2002 and at that time I thought about the airline having their own planes like these and winglets too. It looks like it is becoming a reality.
This is pretty nice stuff for the company.
My pick: Fourth Quarter will be a profit but will be a bit lower than average.

And I hope the classics will also remain in service for a while longer.



Chance favors the prepared mind.
User currently offlineN1120a From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26487 posts, RR: 75
Reply 17, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 4511 times:

>A Boeing 737-600 equipped with Winglets, my goodness that would be extremely appealing to the eye. Definetly a first for Boeing to go with something like this.<

Well, they have been flying 737s with winglets for a while now. This is the first for the -600, but that is not hard to comprehend seeing that there are only 4 airlines flying them

>Will these babies also be equipped with LiveTV like in some of the -700 Fleet?
Uncertain whether that too would be a first in the world.<

Well, B6 A320s were the first with LiveTV, but WJ's entire 737NG fleet will get LiveTV



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineHa763 From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 3657 posts, RR: 5
Reply 18, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 4494 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Flying the -600 to Hawaii seems like a waste. The -700 would be better to use since it does have more range than the -600. With the -700 you would have lower operating costs and carry more pax.

With the -600 being certified for winglets, only the -900 will be left. Now, if one -900 operator would just decide to install winglets, the whole NG family would be available with winglets.


User currently offlineSolnabo From Sweden, joined Jan 2008, 852 posts, RR: 2
Reply 19, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 4430 times:

U kidding, right?

B737-600 w winglets, whats next! 717 w w-lets. I take this w a bucket of salt.

Lord, have mercy on my poor soul.....

Micke  Big grin



Airbus SAS - Love them both
User currently offlineDayflyer From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3807 posts, RR: 3
Reply 20, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 4415 times:

Interesting. They must be trying to make this heavy beast more economical. I never saw much use for the 600 since it was too heavy.


One Nation Under God
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31684 posts, RR: 56
Reply 21, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 4379 times:

High time something was done to improve B736 sales.
regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineBoeing7E7 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 4326 times:

B737-600 w winglets, whats next! 717 w w-lets. I take this w a bucket of salt.

At least they're an effective lifting device rather than a hood ornament.


User currently offlineTransportEng From Canada, joined Jan 2005, 24 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 4255 times:

I'm a bit skeptical about their effectiveness. I'm an engineer although not in aeronautics so I don't know any technical info. However I remember seeing a press release a couple years ago where Westjet said that the winglets improve effeciency by "up to 4%" and later in the release said "statistically 90% accurate". At the time I thought it was strange that they relaxed the normal engineering statistical tolerance of 95% and qualified the 4% with an 'up to'. Also, small number statistics that happen to be just under 5% difference are questionable too for the same reason. I'd like to see the statistical distributions used and data and parameters (how many flights, how did they measure the fuel burn, how to control the experiment), which I know won't happen. There's always a given mean and standard deviation for a data set, and a regression analysis of fuel efficiency would have to account for dozens of factors. I'm not saying they didn't do it though, but that small number statistics are difficult in the best of cases.

It's also always struck me as a bit strange that they're only coming out with these now. See how similar the new airliners coming out are (A380 and 7E7), large scale advances are behind us (not aeronautical advances though). Think of the Concorde and SR-71. It's true, that todays technology allows us to identify those last couple of percentage points that yesterdays tech couldn't. So I'm not saying aeronautical engineers don't do anything these days, they actually more interesting jobs. Instead of working with aerodynamics and wind tunnels they work with simulation and models. In fact, they do a lot of software programming, imagine the challenge of making the software for the stealth bomber to fly like a regular airplane.

Anyway, my point in this ramble is that they probably have an effect, but it might be smaller than advertised, as a 1 to 2% efficiency difference would be hard for airliners to verify, and they might not be worth it in terms of cost/benefit. Maybe someone can provide some links that aren't just press releases. But they look cool, and are advertised to save fuel, so why not?


User currently offlineCanadaEH From Canada, joined Jul 2003, 1341 posts, RR: 4
Reply 24, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 4245 times:

Thinking back to when we first installed winglets, we only had it on one aircraft for a period of 30, 60, or 90 days (can't remember). That aircraft was the "tester" and it was determined that on transcon (YVR/YYC/YEG-YYZ/YUL/YOW) we saved up to 7% fuel burn. Obviously the savings were lower the shorter the distance.

FYI, All of Westjet's 737's (-600/-700/-800) will be equipped with LiveTV and winglets. 118 seats on -600, 136 seats on -700, and 164 seats on -800.

Flying the -600 to Hawaii seems like a waste.

Not really.The market from YVR-HNL is very saturated with Air Canada (2x daily, 340/767), Harmony (10x weekly, 757), Aloha (1x daily, 73G) and Air Pacific (2x weekly, 738). I believe that Westjet's plan is to launch service from cities which don't have direct service - YYC, YEG, YLW, etc. I could be entirely wrong, though.



EH.
25 Ha763 : Not really.The market from YVR-HNL is very saturated with Air Canada (2x daily, 340/767), Harmony (10x weekly, 757), Aloha (1x daily, 73G) and Air Pac
26 Ramprat : HA, I think you forgot about AC 45, a daily 763, in addition to AC43.
27 CanadaEH : I don't want to debate the merits of a hypothetical launch of a route, but we'd need 4 FA's for 136 seats vs. only 3 for 118 seats. However, if we lau
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Westjet To Donate 737 To Bcit posted Mon Sep 29 2003 21:15:28 by CanadaEH
Westjet To Add 737-800's posted Thu Feb 14 2002 00:50:51 by Dash8King
Varig To Fly 737-800 Winglets posted Mon May 14 2001 17:51:10 by Cruising
What Happened To The 737-600? posted Sat Feb 10 2001 01:42:21 by Airbus380
HK Air Firm 30 737/787; To Launch London Flight posted Thu Nov 2 2006 06:45:24 by Jimyvr
WestJet 737-600 Routes posted Wed Sep 27 2006 16:27:17 by JBLUA320
Why No Winglets For The 737-600? posted Tue Jul 11 2006 11:35:41 by LY777
SAS Braathens To Get More 737, Two W/ Winglets posted Thu Jun 15 2006 23:41:33 by OyKIE
WestJet 737-600 In FLL. posted Tue Nov 29 2005 23:06:42 by Falcon Flyer
First WJ 737-600 Took To The Sky Today... posted Wed Aug 10 2005 07:45:52 by WJA73G