Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Link To Article On LHR Noise.  
User currently offlineZonky From New Zealand, joined Nov 2004, 432 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1736 times:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/airlines/story/0,1371,1397964,00.html?gusrc=rss

This may be of interest to this forum.

[Edited 2005-01-25 10:21:58]

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRoblondon70 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 89 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1725 times:

Would mixed-mode ops really increase potential movements to 90 per hour?

User currently offlineScotron11 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 1178 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1712 times:

While I can understand the folk living under a flight path are upset, they should remember that their economic well being comes from that very same airport. By and large, Hounslow and the surrounding area has grown as LHR has grown.

Even if you froze all expansion plans and left LHR as it is, you would not alleviate their noise problem, would you? It would still be there.

As to negative economic benefit. Tell that to pilots, engineers, and all support staff who work there.


User currently offlineZonky From New Zealand, joined Nov 2004, 432 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1703 times:

I don't believe they're so upset about the current noise problem- rather the plans by the airport to again tear up existing agreements- pursuit of new runway (ruled out by T5 planning enquiry....), mixed mode use of runways.....

re: economic benefit: It remains nonsensical to many that Av-gas remains tax free.


User currently offlineScotron11 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 1178 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1695 times:

I can think of nothing more appealing for Gordon Brown. To get his hands on tax money raised from an aviation fuel tax. Just marvel at how big government can grow with all that money! He must be drooling!

As it is, I think the government does pretty well out of the taxes they already charge airlines and passengers.


User currently offlineLHR27C From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 1279 posts, RR: 17
Reply 5, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 1652 times:

Using mixed mode at LHR would enable some increase in movements, and frankly is the only way to expand at all if a third runway is denied and everybody doesn't want to use A380s. However the increase is not all that great. One of the key benefits would be the ability to reduce taxi times by using the runway nearest to a parking stand.

The fact remains that LHR is Europe's busiest airport and it handles considerably more traffic than some other airports which have many more runways and more available land. I don't know another airport anywhere which is so desperately in need of a 3rd runway, and for all the complaints in that article opening a 3rd runway (this would be 2000 metres in length north of 27R/09L) could reduce the noise impact on residents at a given time because there are more runways to alternate around.

BAA has also said, if 3rd runway permission was given and compulsory land purchase necessary they will buy houses from residents where the 3rd runway is planned at prices before it was announced, enabling residents to move away from the noise.

Currently, aircraft land on one runway between 4am and 3pm and take off from the other the rest of the time and then vice versa for a week at a time

This is incorrect, up to 7am both are used for arrivals, but maybe best to keep quiet on that  Smile.



Once you have tasted flight, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned forever skyward
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
BA To Use B767 On LHR-EWR posted Tue Oct 18 2005 23:18:02 by Planesarecool
LHR To MAN On Bmi posted Thu Dec 23 2004 18:01:59 by Rwylie77
Interesting Article On Airlines Maybe Being To CHE posted Mon Nov 29 2004 20:14:55 by Luv2fly
Diversion To VIE On Flight DOH-LHR posted Wed Jul 14 2004 18:21:51 by Futurestar68
VS Changing To 343 On The LHR-IAD Route posted Tue Jun 1 2004 19:09:14 by Silverfox
Article: Airtran To Decide On 717 Options posted Sat May 1 2004 19:30:21 by 717fan
BA To Use 747s On LHR-LIS posted Thu Apr 22 2004 13:26:06 by David_itl
Article On How To Be A Singapore Airlines F/A posted Wed Jul 30 2003 08:23:15 by Trickijedi
What To Expect On My United SFO-LHR Flight? posted Sat May 24 2003 22:28:33 by SJCguy
What To Expect SFO-LHR On VS, LGW-Spain On U2 posted Fri Oct 18 2002 19:43:15 by Tripleseven