Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Is The E170 Living Up To Performance Expectations?  
User currently offlineChrisk From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 7 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 4 months 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 3490 times:

We've heard from US employees and others that the E170 has had problems with range/payload and general dispatch reliability, but Republic and others are happy enough with them to order more. Are the problems reported just teething trouble? Has Embraer gotten them sorted out? Were the problems really that bad in the first place?

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineBoeing7E7 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (11 years 4 months 19 hours ago) and read 3361 times:

There were some problems with the avionics that have been worked out. US Airways biggest problem is the routes. Their poor scheduling is killing them in the fuel burn department. 6800pph more than the CRJ-700.

User currently offlineCO2BGR From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 558 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (11 years 4 months 6 hours ago) and read 3203 times:

6800 pph is close to 1000 gallons per hour. The difference between empty wt and gross is about 35000lbs. You are saying that on a 2 hr flight the DIFFERENCE between an EM7 and a CR7 is 1/3 of the EM7 payload....I dont think so .... get some correct numbers next time instead of wildly guessing wrong.

There are too many self indulgent weiners in this town with too much bloody money" Randal Raines- Gone in 60 Seconds
User currently offline762er From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 542 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (11 years 4 months 6 hours ago) and read 3152 times:

There were some teething issues with the airplane that since have been worked out, mainly avionics/electrical (there were some anti-ice and fmc compatibility issues). We've discovered, however, that with 72 pax it's really not a good airplane for much more than 3 hrs block time. Beyond a 1,000-1,100 nm stage length you're going to start taking some serious payload penalties west bound. In this regard it's not much better than its younger siblings (e145). Where Boeing7E7 came up with those number and that statement is absolutely beyond me but I can assure you, they're not accurate. It's a great airplane cost wise and operationally for missions between about 550nm and 900nms. At least that's been our experience and have heard likewise from Republic/Chatauqua.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
OneWorld & BA: Not Living Up To Expectations posted Wed Feb 2 2005 23:36:25 by PA110
Which Is The Best Cargo Aircaft To Fly Blr-shj-blr posted Fri Jan 20 2006 09:05:40 by BABUMUSHAI
Is The A380 Showing Up On Any Scheds Yet? posted Mon Jan 16 2006 00:12:49 by UAL747
Is The Delta Museum Open To The Public? posted Sun Oct 16 2005 19:44:42 by DeltaL1011man
How Much Is The E170? posted Thu Aug 25 2005 17:49:44 by Dsa
Is The 2nd A380 Ready To Fly Yet? posted Mon Jun 27 2005 14:34:10 by Nomad
When Is The 5th ATL Runway To Open? posted Wed Apr 6 2005 06:37:34 by Lightsaber
What Is The BA Service Like To LCA? posted Mon Apr 4 2005 03:32:56 by CalAir
This Is The Year For Someone To Fail. posted Sun Mar 21 2004 17:05:28 by PVD757
What Is The "Trick" To Upgrades? posted Sat Mar 13 2004 19:08:39 by Ozzie