Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
NO 787/A350 For Emirates?  
User currently offlineFCKC From France, joined Nov 2004, 2348 posts, RR: 4
Posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 4532 times:

Tim Clark , CEO of EK , declared yesterday at Dubai that he considers both 787 and A350 (all versions) too small for him.
Which plane does he look for ?

22 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAA787 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 610 posts, RR: 12
Reply 1, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 4499 times:

He seems to like the A380.

AA787



ET In NYC
User currently offlineCarpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2953 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 4469 times:

Considering they basically have brand-new A332s. Why?

User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Reply 3, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 4443 times:

Perhaps for their forecasted route uses, they would have had to buy many products which can result in a space expenditure at airports; or buy a bigger one. Remember not all carriers follow along what a manufacturer forecasts, it is usually the other way around. Thesedays companies try to be a step ahead to retain the maximum value for their product, giving their customers what they want and when they want it.

I.e. A380 might be a bit ahead, and thus so far, fit into Emirates' idea of the future or their potential uses, same with SQ and anyone that purchse that plane.

ANA purchased 50 some odd 787's for their potential uses, it goes with the territory.



The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
User currently offlineAA737-823 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 5768 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 4339 times:

Hmmm... that's an odd, blanket- type statement. NEITHER the 350 NOR the 787 are large enough? Then it sounds like we've got an order for more 777s and 330s coming.
I really don't think what he said makes sense.


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 5, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 4296 times:

What doesn't make sense?

He'll prefer the 777 and A340-600.

Pretty simple.

N


User currently offlineCarpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2953 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 4283 times:

ANA ordered the 7E7 because by the late this decade the 763s will be a high-cycle airframe and requires replacement. 763s aren't typically used for 6 or 7 rotations a day. Of course, the long-range version of the 7E7 will open up new routes.

EK will continue to use A332 to open up new markets and once traffic is established, they are replaced with larger 777s or A340s.
Of course in due time, the A332 will have to replaced but not just yet.



User currently offlineAtmx2000 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 4576 posts, RR: 38
Reply 7, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 4271 times:

In light of the previous statements saying he wanted a 7E7^H^H^H787 with 290 seat capacity and 8300nm range, it was clear that neither the A359 or 787-9 were going interest him.

That said, I would think a smaller craft like the 787 series would be better for opening up new routes, and replacing with a higher capacity craft like the 777 or A345/6 if demand warrants it.

[Edited 2005-01-30 05:12:08]


ConcordeBoy is a twin supremacist!! He supports quadicide!!
User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Reply 8, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 4138 times:

>>>"Of course, the long-range version of the 7E7 will open up new routes.
"<<

This confuses me everytime I read it. Which came first? The airlines' need for the range or Boeing deciding to add range to give airlines more options? It gives me the impression Boeing may actually have this market by the balls, like what they say goes, in terms of what gets built.

Is it that people dream until the technology come around, or do the dreamers come up with the technology? Who's controlling who? Markets are not supposed to be controlled.

[Edited 2005-01-30 09:27:23]


The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4769 posts, RR: 43
Reply 9, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 4121 times:

EKs A 332s started to get delivered in 1995-96 so some of them are nearing 10 years of service with the airline and that means phasing out will be done within 3-4 years for this type.

You can bet your life that EK will be ordering the larger versions of the B 787 or A 350 in the future as a replacement for their A 330-200s.

EK CEOs Tim Clark mentioned that he doesnt want a B 787-900 seating 3 class configured pax with 257 seats only...he wants 290 seats for a 3 class layout!!! I guess then the best option for him is the A 350-900 seating 3 class pax in a 287 seat layout.



User currently offlineJoKeR From Serbia, joined Nov 2004, 2238 posts, RR: 9
Reply 10, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 4105 times:

A few years back, Mr Clark announced that EK is already outgrowing the A332 and that this type will be retired from the fleet as soon as the first A380s start arriving. The last A332 should leave the fleet, according to that statement, in 2010 (I think).

The smallest aircraft in the fleet will be a Boeing 777-300.



Kafa, čaj, šraf?
User currently offlineAtmx2000 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 4576 posts, RR: 38
Reply 11, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 4049 times:

EK CEOs Tim Clark mentioned that he doesnt want a B 787-900 seating 3 class configured pax with 257 seats only...he wants 290 seats for a 3 class layout!!! I guess then the best option for him is the A 350-900 seating 3 class pax in a 287 seat layout.


But he wanted 8300nm range, which the currently specified A350-900 doesn't give him. It seems that EK wants more than a more efficient A343/772ER replacement, something cheaper and somewhat less capable than the A345/772LR.



ConcordeBoy is a twin supremacist!! He supports quadicide!!
User currently offlineScbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 12474 posts, RR: 46
Reply 12, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 4043 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The smallest aircraft in the fleet will be a Boeing 777-300.

Not quite - they have one A310, plus 772s, A343s and A345s (all of which are smaller than the 773!)  Smile



Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana!
User currently offline9V-SVC From Singapore, joined Oct 2001, 1797 posts, RR: 10
Reply 13, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 4000 times:

Quote : EKs A 332s started to get delivered in 1995-96 so some of them are nearing 10 years of service with the airline and that means phasing out will be done within 3-4 years for this type.



I am sorry to tell you that your info is wrong. EK took delivery of her first A332 in between 2000 and 2001. Their oldest A332 in EK's fleet is only 5-6 years old.



Airliners is the wings of my life.
User currently offlineScorpio From Belgium, joined Oct 2001, 5025 posts, RR: 44
Reply 14, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 3992 times:

EK took delivery of her first A332 in between 2000 and 2001

Actually, make that 1999. March 10 to be precise.


User currently offlineUdo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 3987 times:

I am sorry to tell you that your info is wrong. EK took delivery of her first A332 in between 2000 and 2001. Their oldest A332 in EK's fleet is only 5-6 years old.

I fear that is wrong as well. Emirates' first A332, A6-EKQ, is a 1998 model and was delivered in March 1999. Average A330 fleet age is around four years.


Regards
Udo


User currently offlineUdo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 3987 times:

Nico, you beat me!  Wink/being sarcastic


Regards
Udo


User currently offlineJoKeR From Serbia, joined Nov 2004, 2238 posts, RR: 9
Reply 17, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 3823 times:

Not quite - they have one A310, plus 772s, A343s and A345s (all of which are smaller than the 773!

They have now, they won't then, except the A345s which were not even ordered when the article was published, in Aviation Business if I recall correctly.

The A310 is leaving in May, the 772s are aging and will surely leave by 2010 and the A343s were leased only two years ago. They will remain in the fleet for another six years.

I'm not even going to comment on EK's A345 fleet...



Kafa, čaj, šraf?
User currently offlineMidnightMike From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 2892 posts, RR: 14
Reply 18, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3770 times:

Wow, looks like Emirates could be ordering additional A380's & 777's in the future.


NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 19, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3736 times:

EKs A 332s started to get delivered in 1995-96 so some of them are nearing 10 years of service with the airline and that means phasing out will be done within 3-4 years for this type.

I mean, didn't the 332 first fly in 1998? Hard to have planes from 95 and 96.

A few years back, Mr Clark announced that EK is already outgrowing the A332 and that this type will be retired from the fleet as soon as the first A380s start arriving.

This is logic I can't buy. First off, there are some Indian and Mid East airports where the larger planes have a hard time.

Second, opening a brand new speculative market with a 350 seat plane is bad business and Mr. Clark knows it.

There are going to be airports for which they always need a 250 seat plane.

N


User currently offlineLeelaw From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 3692 times:

The 787 & A350 may well be too small for the unprecedented expansion Mr. Clark anticipates. EK already has a large (29), relatively new fleet of A332s which can be deployed for the secondary routes/missions Gigneil described. Otherwise, Mr. Clark's vision, based on his public utterances, seems to be to supersize everything else.

User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8002 posts, RR: 5
Reply 21, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 2716 times:

I think it's much more likely that EK will be getting more 777-300's in both normal and ER versions. The 787 and A350 are too small for EK's needs.

User currently offlineRj111 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 2702 times:

You won't see any 773A's the whole point in getting the ER's was primarly for the takeoff performance and not the range.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
No 787s , Neither A350s For Emirates , Only 777s? posted Sat Nov 19 2005 17:45:51 by FCKC
Did SU Announce The Order For 787/A350? posted Thu Nov 3 2005 15:27:27 by NYC777
No Aussie Orders For Boeing's 787 posted Wed Apr 27 2005 11:36:08 by Jacobin777
Why No 744s For Emirates? posted Wed Oct 27 2004 01:31:12 by TradewindL1011
Alitalia: No More Skirts For Its F/A (funny) posted Fri Nov 10 2006 11:27:17 by Wingedarrow
Boeing Aims To Keep Airbus @ Bay No 787 Delays! posted Fri Oct 20 2006 04:26:05 by Coelacanth
No Wake Constraints For The A380 posted Thu Sep 28 2006 19:24:57 by BoomBoom
Why No 787-4? posted Thu Sep 28 2006 04:14:04 by 747400sp
Another Chinese 787 Goes For GEnx posted Fri Sep 15 2006 23:08:01 by NDSchu777
No More Funding For Scottish Long Haul Flights posted Sun Sep 10 2006 21:42:58 by Humberside