Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Air Lines Vs. Airlines Vs. Airways?  
User currently offlineLincoln From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 3887 posts, RR: 8
Posted (8 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2805 times:

What if any difference (either superficial or technical) prompts a carrier to adopt the name "XYZ Airlines" vs. "XYZ Airways" vs. "XYZ Air Lines"?

ex:
jetBlue Airways
US Airways
Pan American World Airways
Delta Air Lines
Korean Air Lines
Ozark Air Lines
Northwest Airlines
American Airlines
United Airlines


I've always kindof wondered about the differences, one of the reasons why I'm asking this question now is reading about Eastern: They seemed to do business as "Eastern Air Lines" however the entity seemed to be officially known as "Eastern Airlines, Inc." (or at least that's how they've been sued)

Thanks!

Lincoln/


CO Is My Airline of Choice || Baggage Claim is an airline's last chance to disappoint a customer || Next flts in profile
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently onlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 18907 posts, RR: 64
Reply 1, posted (8 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2775 times:

While an airline can certainly name itself anything it wants, and probably selects what to call itself for marketing reasons more than anything, there was a famous event in 1934 that caused upheavel in the naming of the existing U.S. airlines of the day.
In late 1933, Senator Hugo L. Black launched an investigation into the air mail contracts held by the nation’s airlines. These contracts, which meant life or death for an airline, had been organized and controlled by Postmaster General Walter Brown. Brown was a very aeronautical minded man and had made great, and sometimes unpopular, efforts to nurture the United States’ fledgling air transportation system. The end result of Senator Black’s investigation was that President Roosevelt cancelled all existing air mail contracts on February 9, 1934 and handed over air mail service to the U.S. Army Air Corps.

[The new] rules stipulated that no company bidding for an airmail contract could be affiliated with an aircraft manufacturing company ... furthermore, the new regulations on bidding for airmail contracts stated that no airline which had held an airmail contract during the Walter Brown era could bid for a new contract.


http://www.crsmithmuseum.org/AAhistory/origin.htm

In order to re-bid for mail contracts, existing airlines reincorporated, usually just changing their names from "Airways" to "Airlines", etc.

You can see evidence of that in American Airways -> American Airlines here:

http://www.timetableimages.com/ttimages/aa.htm

Cheers.

[Edited 2005-01-30 02:29:09]


International Homo of Mystery
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 25852 posts, RR: 79
Reply 2, posted (8 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2767 times:

It is all based on whether the carrier wanted to keep an older style name (Air Lines), or newer. A lot of it also evolved from when the US Government stripped all the mail contracts from the various US carriers because of sketchy business practices, and those carriers all had to change their names to keep on carrying mail (AA used to be known as American Airways, etc.). It is all based on preference.

[Edited 2005-01-30 02:30:55]


Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31201 posts, RR: 58
Reply 3, posted (8 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2657 times:

Its whatever suits.
Personally Jet Airways sounds better than Jet Airlines.
& Indian Airlines sounds better than Indian Airways.
Air Sahara got their name changed from Sahara Airlines earlier.
Kingfisher Airlines sounds better too.
 Smile
regds
MEL


Think of the brighter side!
User currently offline57AZ From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2550 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (8 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2627 times:

There's also a grammatical difference. The defination of "Air Line" is the shortest route (most direct) between two points. In the late 1800s, many railroads used the term in advertising and one in fact, the Seaboard Air Line used as part of the company's formal name. Thus many aviation companies chose to use "airline" vs. "air line."


"When a man runs on railroads over half of his lifetime he is fit for nothing else-and at times he don't know that."
User currently offlineJetBlueAtJFK From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 1687 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (8 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2589 times:

I remember a while back delta tried to be Delta Air not airlines because there advertising was no more lines. I remember it was on a big billboard near LGA. Obviously that didn't work because it still isn't air.

jetBlueAtJFK


When You Know jetBlue, You Know Better
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Air Lines Or Airlines posted Wed May 8 2002 18:17:52 by 727LOVER
Flying In Belize: Tropic Air Vs. Maya Airways? posted Mon Dec 1 2003 21:47:51 by Lindy field
Why "Delta Air Lines" Instead Of "Delta Airlines"? posted Mon Aug 14 2000 09:35:31 by B737-112
Onur Air And VS Tailstrike Pics? posted Mon Jul 31 2006 11:05:08 by Cabinboy
Next Round: Air Canada Vs GDSs Re: Tango Fares posted Tue May 16 2006 07:42:11 by ETStar
Jetblue Vs US Airways posted Wed May 3 2006 20:29:38 by Jaws707
Air Slovakia Vs. Slovak Airlines posted Mon Aug 8 2005 16:30:22 by NYCFlyer
Air China Vs. China Airlines posted Mon Oct 11 2004 05:32:55 by Mike77
Delta Air Lines DL191 And United Airlines UA232 posted Wed Feb 25 2004 21:53:29 by SonicKidatBWI
Caribbean Sun Vs. Sun Airways posted Fri Dec 12 2003 14:24:11 by LatinAviation