Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CX Cargo To Start HKG-ATL Flights.  
User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 5364 times:

http://atlanta.bizjournals.com/atlanta/stories/2005/01/31/daily46.html?jst=cn_cn_lk

Three times a week service starting in the fall. Rumors are now circulating (and implied in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution today in their article on this) that if the cargo flights are successful that CX may start HKG-ATL service.

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 26147 posts, RR: 50
Reply 1, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 5294 times:

The South East region has been developing nicely lately cargo wise, with Atlanta capturing the bulk of these services.

I'm not too sure Cathay could run successful passenger flights to Atlanta however. ATL is an entrenched hub of Delta whom is a member of Skyteam. Cathay would be hard pressed to get connecting traffic.

It would be more likely so see Cathay serve an American Airlines hub city like Chicago first.




From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 5253 times:

CX may start HKG-ATL service.

Firstly, CX doesn't have an aircraft that can fly ATL-HKG with any profit-potential payload levels whatsoever.

Secondly, why would CX fly to a competitor's superhub, ergo offering little connectivity/feed, in a marginal market for Asian O&D?


User currently offlineAvianca From Venezuela, joined Jan 2005, 5934 posts, RR: 40
Reply 3, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 5240 times:

great to see another cargo carrier coming to ATL.

ATL is a very big cargo airport, not the biggest hub (ok only in the Carolinas) but with big demand for finaldestination cargo.

cargoflights from europe to atl are very good booked. the big part of the capacities is sold as BLOCK SPACE AGREEMENTS.

regards
Avianca



Colombia es el Mundo Y el Mundo es Colombia
User currently offlineCX flyboy From Hong Kong, joined Dec 1999, 6639 posts, RR: 55
Reply 4, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 5175 times:

We are expecting several new freighters to join the fleet in the coming years, so expect to see more new destinations and increased frequency on many routes.

User currently offlineFrostbite From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 396 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 5024 times:

So CX will join other Asians JL, KE, CI, and BR at ATL...the ATL-Asia cargo market has shown some impressive growth over the last 5 years or so since the south cargo terminal was constructed (granted JL only ramped up cargo service when they yanked pax service).
Curious to see if remaining major cargo players such as SQ and NCA will follow suit.
Just my speculation, but construction of the 4th module at S cargo will probably have to begin soon to accomodate demand. Amazing the changes occuring on the S side of ATL.

If only I could nonrev on ATL-bound freighters out of ANC to get home...


User currently offlineN757kw From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 437 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 4955 times:

Just what we need here, more capacity to Asia. Inbound flights are full, but outbound are much harder to fill. I was at the announcement made at the airport, unfortunately, the City of Atlanta held it in the former Equine Center, so I did not hear what any of the speakers said.

As to the other building being built at South Cargo. I have heard lots of rumors, but I suspect it will not get built for several more years. ATL's cargo facilities are poorly planned and cargo has been mainly an afterthought to the airport until recently.

It would be nice to see more passenger flights to Asia, but it looks like ATL will only have the daily flight to NRT (DL), and the 5 times a week flight to ICN (KE). The KE flight to ICN will go daily on 30APR.

N757KW



"What we've got here, is failure to communicate." from Cool Hand Luke
User currently offlineJakob77 From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 210 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 4895 times:

The geographic location of ATL makes it difficult for non-stop flights between ATL and most Asian cities unless a 345 or 772LR is utilized. Currently for Asian carriers only SQ has taken delivery of the 345. Any other airline offering ATL service would most likely require a refueling stop somewhere.

User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 4858 times:

Currently for Asian carriers only SQ has taken delivery of the 345

Not true.

lest you forget who launched the A345 into service?


User currently offlineFrostbite From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 396 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 4807 times:

Regardless of aircraft range issues, it is hard to envision any Asian carrier launching pax services to ATL unless they fall under the DL/Skyteam codeshare umbrella. The list of "international carriers which formerly served ATL" is a laundry list of carriers which either had no codeshare relationship with DL, or pulled out after cessation of a codeshare relationship (JL the Asian example). CI would seem the most likely candidate given their new codeshare relationship with DL and CO, but since they already began IAH service, they may find an ATL route redundant.

It is possible that the 787 will make ATL a more viable market for Asian pax services in the future.


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 4775 times:

CI would seem the most likely candidate given their new codeshare relationship with DL and CO, but since they already began IAH service, they may find an ATL route redundant.


CO's Taiwanese partner is BR, not CI


User currently offlineFrostbite From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 396 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 4755 times:

ConcordeBoy,

Indeed, I stand corrected! Given DL's new codeshare ties with both CI and CO...I mistakenly assumed CI & CO were dancing partners too.



Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Air NewZealand To Start HKG - LHR Flights! posted Mon May 21 2001 07:16:46 by Hkgspotter1
CX Cargo To ATL posted Mon Dec 26 2005 20:55:57 by Paulinbna
China Southern Cargo To Start Flights To Egypt posted Sat Oct 30 2004 14:02:59 by Horus
US To Start BNA-LAS Flights posted Mon Jul 17 2006 15:51:02 by N702ML
Mexicana And Qantas To Start Code Shared Flights posted Thu Jul 13 2006 22:57:10 by Orbis
Spirit To Start MCO-ATL posted Sun May 21 2006 17:06:27 by MAH4546
Kingfisher To Start India-USA Flights posted Mon Apr 24 2006 22:01:32 by DALelite
AB To Start STN-BHD Flights posted Wed Mar 15 2006 21:10:03 by Vfw614
AF Cargo To Start Service At DFW posted Tue Mar 7 2006 20:29:40 by KC135TopBoom
Afriqiyah Airways To Start TIP-CAI Flights posted Fri Jan 27 2006 12:41:57 by Horus