Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Merger/Consolidation Inevitable For USA Carriers?  
User currently offlineASTROJET707 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 299 posts, RR: 5
Posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1825 times:

This is for all the economists and arm-chair-CEOs. Given the current economic climate the the US are consolidations/mergers inevitable? Will they wait until carriers have cash or the ability to finance? Are the criteria for a sensible merger different from say 10 or 20 years ago? Thanks.

AJ707

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTango-Bravo From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3805 posts, RR: 29
Reply 1, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1723 times:

In the post-deregulation era it makes much more sense, IMO, for airlines lacking "the right stuff" to be allowed to go out of business and allow the marketplace to determine who (existing and/or new carriers), if anyone, will fill any vacuum left by the departure(s) of one or more airlines. While I won't go so far as to say that there is no such thing as a good merger, growth from within has, IMO, proven to be a vastly superior game plan in the airline industry -- for airlines, their employees and their customers.

User currently offlinePlaneSmart From New Zealand, joined Dec 2004, 938 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1673 times:

For struggling businesses, banks generally work co-operatively, even to the extent of forgiving debt. This approach is taken because whilst property, plant & machinery, etc have a value, realising it, other than as on a going concern basis, is very difficult. Better to help the business trade out, than letting them go under.

Because an airline's assets are mobile, and can be re-deployed more readily, there is generally less willingness by banks to forgive debt. Better to simply extricate their assets, sell or lease to new clients, and move on.

Now that is a generalisation.

Clouding the situation in the US is Chapter 11, which was intended as short-term protection against asset owners, giving businesses the chance to re-organise, under less duress, and taking into account interests other than just lenders/financiers.

US Chapter 11 rules are actually envied by many countries, some of which are working towards implementing similar provisions.

Frankly, the US has the greater need for Chapter 11. US banks are the least co-operative when it comes to working collaboratively to allow a client to keep trading, so they can either sort out their problems, or be liquidated in a managed fashion. Where syndicated funding is involved, they often threaten to take unilateral action, unless other members of the syndicate buy them out.

Chapter 11 in the US is good, but is being misused. The longer financial problems are permitted to fester, the more other players, some of whom are in quite reasonable shape, will be affected, and the harder the landing when failures occur.


User currently offlineScotron11 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 1178 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1570 times:

It is an interesting question, especially in the wake of 9/11. Here in the EU we seem to be moving in the direction of more consolidation. Given the current state of the US airline industry, would the regulatory bodies look more favorably on mergers like UAL/US?

Instead of the "Big 6", will there one day be the "Big 3" airlines, ala the automobile companies? I think for that to occur, one of two things have to happen: a huge merger or a huge collapse.


User currently offlineJuventus From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 2835 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 1529 times:

There is now way around it.
There are too many airlines in the US, and 3 new start ups for 2005 (Virgin America, Primaris, and a new international LCC based at BWI).


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
NW's FA's Say No Merger Without A Contact For Them posted Tue Nov 21 2006 14:32:59 by MSPGUY
Is Tunisia Open For European Carriers? posted Mon Oct 30 2006 14:30:23 by Beaucaire
American Pilots Flying For International Carriers. posted Mon Aug 28 2006 19:27:25 by KingAirMan
Why Not A340 For US Carriers? posted Thu Aug 10 2006 22:28:47 by Eastern023
Working For Gulf Carriers.. posted Mon May 22 2006 23:42:01 by Ronerone
London Based FA's For Overseas Carriers posted Sun Apr 30 2006 14:03:39 by CXtra
Pilot Shortage A Serious Prob For African Carriers posted Fri Apr 14 2006 15:01:18 by Ethiopian787
Longest Range 777s And 787s For US Carriers posted Tue Mar 7 2006 06:34:37 by AA777223
Winglet Status For US Carriers posted Thu Oct 6 2005 15:55:51 by RL757PVD
AW-USAirways Merger Means Changes For PHX posted Fri Sep 16 2005 19:44:35 by KarlB737