Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Virgin America  
User currently offline252MKR From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 108 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 5162 times:

Word on Flightinfo is that Virgin America are (Queen's English verb tense) having trouble getting financing with the current U.S. airline environment.

Does anyone else have info? And, is it really smart to have a "new" LCC? We need another airline here like we need a hole-in-the-head.

That said--R. Branson is an intelligent and amusing person--if he can make a go of it, more power to him!


"...If I'm here, and you're here--doesn't that make it our time?" Jeff Spicoli
21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRichard28 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2003, 1633 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 5082 times:

Quoting 252MKR (reply 0):
Word on Flightinfo is that Virgin America are (Queen's English verb tense) having trouble getting financing with the current U.S. airline environment.


interesting, perhaps the impending UA problems are delaying final contracts - if UA goes under, then Virgin at SFO would be a very promising proposition for investors I would have thought.


Quoting 252MKR (reply 0):
Does anyone else have info? And, is it really smart to have a "new" LCC? We need another airline here like we need a hole-in-the-head.


demand and supply dictates who survives - just like any other business. why should airlines be any different?

Quoting 252MKR (reply 0):
That said--R. Branson is an intelligent and amusing person--if he can make a go of it, more power to him!


As a VS flyer, I have to agree!!

Rich.


User currently offline252MKR From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 108 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 5001 times:

It is too bad that you submit VS needs to have a legacy airline go "off the rails" in order to make it in the US market. I would submit that the Virgin brand is strong enough to make it on its own. That, and a great OPS team who can plan around the "challenges" that exist in SFO.

When you make a go of it--please make your colour Blue. Americans resonate more with blue than red--has to do with politics.

Cheers

[Edited 2005-02-26 04:56:48]


"...If I'm here, and you're here--doesn't that make it our time?" Jeff Spicoli
User currently offlineRichard28 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2003, 1633 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 4979 times:

Quoting 252MKR (reply 2):


Quoting 252MKR (reply 2):
It is too bad that you submit VS needs to have a legacy airline go "off the rails" in order to make it in the US market. I would submit that the Virgin brand is strong enough to make it on its own. That; and a great OPS team who can plan around the "challenges" that exist in SFO.


I think you read me wrong, I was hypothosising why investors may be holding back on investment in Virgin America.

Personally, I agree with you, the Virgin brand could succeed without another carrier going under.


User currently offline1MillionFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 4963 times:

Sir Richard has already shown the ability to take on "legacy" companies in the US via Virgin Music stores and Virgin Cola, why would an airline be any different  Smile

Cheers


User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 1001 posts, RR: 51
Reply 5, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 4947 times:

Quoting 252MKR (reply 0):
Word on Flightinfo is that Virgin America are (Queen's English verb tense) having trouble getting financing with the current U.S. airline environment.


To quote JetBlue CEO David Neelmen, "People who invest in airlines are the biggest suckers ever." Airlines are a highly speculative, highly risky investment... with current fuel and ticket prices, the only way to make money is to hedge fuel heavily like WN. It takes massive financial resources to pull that off.

Maybe in 2007-2008 things will cool down and the market will be more suitable for another LCC. Today, Virgin America can at best hope to do one thing: make SFO go Ted.

Quoting 252MKR (reply 0):
And, is it really smart to have a "new" LCC? We need another airline here like we need a hole-in-the-head.


I think Richard sumed up supply/demand well.


User currently offlineRichard28 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2003, 1633 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 4932 times:

Quoting DfwRevolution (reply 5):
To quote JetBlue CEO David Neelmen, "People who invest in airlines are the biggest suckers ever." Airlines are a highly speculative, highly risky investment... with current fuel and ticket prices, the only way to make money is to hedge fuel heavily like WN. It takes massive financial resources to pull that off.


Or to quote Richard Branson himself, "the easiest way to become a millionaire is to be a billionaire - and start an airline"

[Edited 2005-02-26 05:12:44]

User currently offline252MKR From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 108 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 4911 times:

Going against VS of A:

1) SFO-centrism. Delays are second only to LGA. Yes, I know these city pairs make the market--but ops issues may trump sales gains. SFO is legend with nightmare flying conditions. These realities must be "managed to."

#2) Johnny-come-lately; VS of A will have to overcome the trendy, trend of LCC's wishing to emulate the Target Stores Airline model, putting rear-ends in 31" pitch seats, and making them feel great about it.

Going for VS of A:

1) Through Pop culture--they already have branding with the target demographic--25-40 males--the ones who have and spend all of the $$$.

2) They have an Ibiza-esque aura about them of good times and chic. This can not be bought.

Summary:

Now is the time--Do a "work-around" the foreign ownership issue. And get 'er dune!



"...If I'm here, and you're here--doesn't that make it our time?" Jeff Spicoli
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 1001 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 4875 times:

Quoting Richard28 (reply 6):

Or to quote Richard Branson himself, "the easiest way to become a millionaire is to be a billionaire - and start an airline"


I'll stick with Neelmen's assertion given that Branson is venturing into his territory, and not vice versa  Big grin

The most successful airline in the U.S. is only making money because it gambled in 2003 that fuel was about to spike. That doesn't bode well with investors. This isn't Virgin Atlantic, this isn't Virgin Blue... the five airlines in Ch.11 right now all cite overcapacity and fierce competition as a reason for their woes. Investors will know that too.

If Branson wants a North American airline, fantastic... but if he has half a brain, wait until you have something working in your favor. Hell just wait until US is gone and pick-up/rebrand their assets


User currently offlineCkfred From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 5311 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 4856 times:

Richard28:

I thought Warren Buffet made that remark after his investment in US.


User currently offlineLegacyins From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2146 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 4773 times:

Quoting 252MKR (reply 7):
) SFO-centrism. Delays are second only to LGA. Yes, I know these city pairs make the market--but ops issues may trump sales gains. SFO is legend with nightmare flying conditions. These realities must be "managed to."


I believe ORD had the distinction last year of having the most delayed prone problems. SFO is not as bad as you may believe.



John@SFO
User currently offlineFlyibaby From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 1017 posts, RR: 6
Reply 11, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 4711 times:

Ckfred

Your right. Warren Buffet has said that numerous times.


User currently offlineStowAway From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 640 posts, RR: 4
Reply 12, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 4673 times:

Quoting 252MKR (reply 2):
When you make a go of it--please make your colour Blue. Americans resonate more with blue than red--has to do with politics.


I know about 52 million Americans that disagree.  Big grin



A monkey's ass always talks crap.
User currently offlineLuv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12150 posts, RR: 49
Reply 13, posted (9 years 10 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 4538 times:

Quoting Richard28 (reply 6):
Or to quote Richard Branson himself, "the easiest way to become a millionaire is to be a billionaire - and start an airline"


It was Warren Buffet who made that remark and it does hit the nail on the head and is 110% on the money.



You can cut the irony with a knife
User currently offlineAA717driver From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 1566 posts, RR: 13
Reply 14, posted (9 years 10 months 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 4419 times:

I don't think '07-'08 will be any more airline friendly that it is now. As someone pointed out on another board, we are in the middle of the economic recovery and airlines are still losing their butts.

The next down turn may well be the grim reaper for some carriers. VSA might be able to profit from that or it may scare them off.TC



FL450, M.85
User currently offlineRichard28 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2003, 1633 posts, RR: 6
Reply 15, posted (9 years 10 months 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 4400 times:

sorry I thought it was Richard Branson who said that.

thanks for correcting me  Smile

[Edited 2005-02-26 16:28:44]

User currently offlineZOTAN From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 613 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (9 years 10 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3928 times:

Can someone clear this Virgin America thing up for me? Virgin America was originally a joint venture between Neeleman and Branson before JetBlue was started. The two didnt really get along so nothing ever happened. Is Branson now trying to start another Virgin America?

User currently offline1MillionFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (9 years 10 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3826 times:

yes Virgin America is a new venture based in Burlingame, Ca by SFO and is currently seeking funding. SInce there has to be Majority US ownership, there has been a very difficult time getting funding.

User currently offlineCOEWR From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 273 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (9 years 10 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 3678 times:

Quoting StowAway (reply 12):
Quoting 252MKR (reply 2):
When you make a go of it--please make your colour Blue. Americans resonate more with blue than red--has to do with politics.


I know about 52 million Americans that disagree.



Thank you StowAway  Smile


User currently offlinePlanesNTrains From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 5794 posts, RR: 28
Reply 19, posted (9 years 10 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3260 times:

Quoting COEWR (reply 18):
When you make a go of it--please make your colour Blue. Americans resonate more with blue than red--has to do with politics.


I know about 52 million Americans that disagree


Here we go again...



Next Trip: SEA-ABQ-SEA on Alaska
User currently offlineQQflyboy From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2297 posts, RR: 13
Reply 20, posted (9 years 10 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2530 times:

On the VirginAmerica website, http://www.virginamerica.com , it used to stay they'd be starting service in the middle of 2005. Now, there is a brief message from CEO Fred Reid that says, "We look forward to welcoming you on board in 2005."

Do you think it is possible for them to get all the approvals and training complete to start by the end of the year? I know this depends widely on how long it takes the DOT to certify the carrier, but it seems to me if they're to get off the ground by the end of the year, things, BIG things, need to start happening now.

[Edited 2005-02-27 00:59:42]


The views expressed are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect my employer’s views.
User currently offline2H4 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 8956 posts, RR: 60
Reply 21, posted (9 years 10 months 7 hours ago) and read 1765 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR

From a job posting on Monster.com:

About Virgin America
Virgin America will be a new generation airline, an innovator that challenges industry norms to deliver a better value for domestic air travelers. By uniting Virgin’s world-renowned customer-focus, and distinctive style, Virgin America plans to create a high-value, low-fare airline that offers more – more options, more comfort, more entertainment, more value. The U.S. airline will be American-controlled and majority-owned as well as managed by a team of leading American aviation executives and plans to add more than 3,000 jobs to the U.S. economy over the next five years.

Additionally, Virgin America has entered into agreements to acquire and lease up to 105 Airbus A320-Family aircraft. The aircraft deal calls for initial delivery in early 2005 with a firm order for 18 new aircraft – 11 A319s and seven A320s – with 15 additional new A320s being leased from GE Capital Aviation Services. The agreement with Airbus also contains options for up to 72 additional aircraft. All aircraft will be equipped with engines from CFM International, a 50/50 joint company between Snecma Moteurs of France and GE.



2H4





Intentionally Left Blank
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
TAM Leases 2x A320 From Virgin America posted Fri Nov 10 2006 11:32:48 by WINGS
Virgin America Sends Second Plane To SFO posted Mon Nov 6 2006 23:50:35 by Xpfg
Virgin America Inching Closer To Start posted Sat Oct 21 2006 01:56:50 by Planenutz
RDU Supports Virgin America With Letter To DOT posted Wed Oct 18 2006 08:16:19 by Aamr
Time Lapse Video Of Virgin America A320 In Paint posted Sat Oct 14 2006 19:19:54 by Clickhappy
Virgin America Lets Public Name Planes posted Thu Oct 12 2006 02:39:21 by Cubedweller
Virgin America Readies For Takeoff posted Tue Oct 10 2006 05:25:53 by JetBlueAUS
Virgin America In SFO posted Sat Oct 7 2006 22:45:16 by Xpfg
Where Will Virgin America Fly And When? posted Wed Sep 27 2006 06:10:14 by Mainrunway
Virgin America To Receive Its OK Soon? posted Sun Aug 27 2006 04:37:29 by Paulcaz