Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
National Geographic's Aircrash Investigation  
User currently offlineTomys From Czech Republic, joined Mar 2005, 88 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 4815 times:

Hello people  Smile

Couple of months ago I just became crazy about National Geographic Channel's Aircrash Investigation series and also Seconds from Disaster (e.g. Tenerfie B747's collision, Concorde).

I am actually very impressed by quality of these films, they are more (how to say?) suspenseful than any theather movie. I am sure they had to spent a lot of money to create such reconcstruction movies.

I am honestly quite disturbed by the movies, mainly because they are real stories and very well made but sometimes you are shocked by fact how big stories is real life able to write.

Today they were showing British Airways' aicraft's front window dissapear and captain is badly hurt but he survived, amazingly!

However, the strongest story for me is still Air Transat A330 whose engine died in midway over Atlantic. Thay landed in Asors, and they had been incredibly lucky...

Anybody watching it too?

26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineTheGov From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 415 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 4637 times:

If you think those are something, you should see "Air Emergency". Last week they covered the mid-air collision between the DHL 757 and the Russian a/c full of children (sorry, can't remember the a/c type or airline right now). The animation was simply chilling.


Always a pallbearer, never a corpse.
User currently offlineSolnabo From Sweden, joined Jan 2008, 852 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 4570 times:

Quoting TheGov (reply 1):


It was a Tu-154.

Micke  Sad



Airbus SAS - Love them both
User currently offlineApuneger From Belgium, joined Sep 2000, 3032 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 4509 times:

I agree. 'Aircraft Investigation' is quite interesting to see. Have you already seen the episode on the Alaska Airlines MD-87?

I'd rather see them having no more subjects to do make more episodes, but unfortunately aircraft accidents will continue to happen  Sad

Greets,
Ivan



Ivan Coninx - Brussels Aviation Photography
User currently offlineSN-A330 From Belgium, joined Aug 2001, 1129 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 4494 times:

Hi all,

I would like to refer to this topic I started yesterday about National Geographic 'Aircraft Investigation'

Please take al look at this one: http://www.airliners.net/discussions...eneral_aviation/read.main/1983051/

Regards
SN-A330



I would rather be flying...
User currently offlineMandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 6873 posts, RR: 75
Reply 5, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 4474 times:

The Alaska MD80 and AA MD80 and AeroPeru 757 were good programmes... Big grin

Very good insight... especially regarding the methodology... *comparing with other programmes that is*

Mandala499



When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
User currently offlineDgeHfx From Canada, joined May 2001, 132 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 4448 times:

In Canada these documentaries are shown on a TV programme called Mayday, on the Discovery Channel.

User currently offlineReady4Pushback From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2004, 364 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4400 times:

I watch all of them, and totally agree, they are very good documentaries, even if they are ultimately very sad.

The Air Transat one was my favourite as well, and I have long thought about starting a discussion thread about that incident. I can't believe the captain got away with it - how can you transfer fuel into a tank which is obviously loosing fuel? If he didn't believe the computer when it said the tank was loosing fuel, then again - why the need to transfer fuel? Hasn't anyone thought of this?


User currently offlineOrion737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4383 times:

The air investigations are very well done. Not cheap or tacky programmes but well researched and put together. they are often quite scary and chilling reconstructions.

User currently offlineBlackhawk144 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4366 times:

I can't say what my favorite is, but the ASA had the most suspensful animations, where they animated it crashing inton the ground. Same goes with the Swissair where they show it hit the water.

Anthony


User currently offlineTomys From Czech Republic, joined Mar 2005, 88 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4355 times:

Quoting TheGov (reply 1):
Last week they covered the mid-air collision between the DHL 757 and the Russian a/c full of children
I very well remember that case and also I saw the movie about it on Discovery Channel. However, these are not as good as those of National Geographic. Unfortunately, 'Czech' National Geographic is somehow behind UK so we will get the episode you mentioned soon  Smile However, from what I have seen on Discovery Channel, I probably didn't see so much unnecessary accident  Sad So much.


User currently offlineTomys From Czech Republic, joined Mar 2005, 88 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4341 times:

Quoting Apuneger (reply 3):
Have you already seen the episode on the Alaska Airlines MD-87?
Yes I have and honestly, I will never fly with MD-87. They explained well not only maintenance criminal failure, but also design weaknesses. It's quite often about maintenance approach, and also very dangerous, because they are usualy hidden and it's difficult to see them comming. I am sure passengers has to live with horrible moments before their death  Sad


User currently offlineTomys From Czech Republic, joined Mar 2005, 88 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4337 times:

Quoting SN-A330 (reply 4):
Please take al look at this one: http://www.airliners.net/discussions...>
National Geographic already has movie about TWA800, 30 minutes episode as part of Seismic Seconds series. They are probably doing new one for Aircrash investigation series, but can they bring something new?

This was also horrible accident. Honestly, until I saw this document I thought the reason of crash is still unknown...

'This all happened in 45 seconds, but it took 4 years to understand...'


User currently offlineTomys From Czech Republic, joined Mar 2005, 88 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 4328 times:

Quoting Ready4Pushback (reply 7):
The Air Transat one was my favourite as well, and I have long thought about starting a discussion thread about that incident. I can't believe the captain got away with it - how can you transfer fuel into a tank which is obviously loosing fuel? If he didn't believe the computer when it said the tank was loosing fuel, then again - why the need to transfer fuel? Hasn't anyone thought of this?
Exactly my thoughts! I am shocked he is seen as HERO! And then how he was flaunting on post-incident press conference, but such huge ignorance!

Honestly I cannot imagine how I fould feel being in that plane, huh!


User currently offlineTomys From Czech Republic, joined Mar 2005, 88 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 4315 times:

Quoting Blackhawk144 (reply 9):
Same goes with the Swissair where they show it hit the water
I agree. What also impressed me that investigators didn't gave up and search through bilions of aicraft's pieces to find the real cause. It was really awesome.

But I have question regarding this. In the movie, there was a guy, engineer, how was making his own investigations and he actually recommended to change the screw before the crash. It was overhauled by some supervisors just to find that that plane crashed few months later. And then some lady, I am not sure but maybe from investigation team, she told that he cannot work for avioation industry anymore. I didn't understand why?


User currently offlineSwissy From Switzerland, joined Jan 2005, 1734 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 4308 times:

I watched them all and I agree with you guys, top quality
research, like how a chain reaction starts mechanical or by human error it gives us a better understanding how and why, it even might give some people witch lost a loved one
or someone they know some closing in my case with
SR111, I went to the crash site and I could not understand
how and what append after I was able to watch the show
it explained a lot of questions I had.
Well done Discovery Channel!!!


User currently offlineTomys From Czech Republic, joined Mar 2005, 88 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 4217 times:

Which case you mean? Fire in cocpit of Swiss Air?

User currently offlineJAM747 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 550 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 4098 times:

These programs are very interesting. I think it also helps us appreciate the people who help us to have safe flights even more. There is obviously alot involved in keeping air travel safe with such small margins for errors. I wish Discovery Wings was still around to show programs like these.

User currently offlineReady4Pushback From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2004, 364 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3945 times:

Quoting Tomys (reply 13):
Exactly my thoughts! I am shocked he is seen as HERO! And then how he was flaunting on post-incident press conference, but such huge ignorance!

Agreed. I think it raises a whole host of questions. Someone who "doesn't trust computers" pilotting an Airbus? errr, right. It was impressive that he brought the plane down, but he put it in that position in the first place. There were a number of points where he could have prevented that situation, and he didn't.


User currently offlineFlyingColours From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2315 posts, RR: 10
Reply 19, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 3933 times:

Tomys - He can't work in the industry because he blew the whistle, unfortuntly whistle blowers are unable to work in the industry after they have brought shortcomings, incomptence etc to light of authorities or investigators, a sad but true fact.

It's a really good series and I do think it is the best programme I have seen in a long time, they actually do a lot of hard work to get such detail in their reconstruction. The one on Monday night here was the midair collision between the TU-154 and the B757F, it was really worth watching but they did slip up in the detail department though, they had a grey 757 flightdeck, the Aeroperu from the last series was spot on though.

Seconds From Disaster has so much potential but it is so sensationalistic, it really annoyed me with the Concorde one and seemed to side with the BEA (French Accident Investigators) report rather than what everyone else said - no mention of how the French wouldn't let anyone other than the BEA look at the wreckage and how it avoided facts like, they flew into the wind, the runway surface was in a horrendous condition etc...

Phil
FlyingColours



Lifes a train racing towards you, now you can either run away or grab a chair & a beer and watch it come - Phil
User currently offlineTomys From Czech Republic, joined Mar 2005, 88 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 3839 times:

Quoting FlyingColours (reply 19):
He can't work in the industry because he blew the whistle, unfortuntly whistle blowers are unable to work in the industry after they have brought shortcomings, incomptence etc to light of authorities or investigators, a sad but true fact.
Really?! I am completely shocked honestly, he wanted safe lifes of many! This is really shocking info for me, thanks for explanation anyway. This is some law or what?

Quoting FlyingColours (reply 19):
Seconds From Disaster has so much potential but it is so sensationalistic
Ummmm... yes! I have to agree up to some level, true. But I somehow like it but indeed I would prefer facts before sensation!

They are rotating current series, does anybody know if NG is planning new episodes?

Quoting Ready4Pushback (reply 18):
Someone who "doesn't trust computers" pilotting an Airbus? errr, right. It was impressive that he brought the plane down, but he put it in that position in the first place. There were a number of points where he could have prevented that situation, and he didn't.

I completely agree. Actually, when I was watching that movie for the first time (it was in the night), with my head in my hands with open mouth I was just watching/listening his 'ummm, it has to be computer problem'!.

I feel just because he hasn't experienced this before and maintenance support had not any immediate solution, he just said 'it cannot be'. That's one of the biggest mistakes I believe.

I was working for one of mobile operators and one of my rules was 'Once you are not sure, expect/prepare for worse case'.


User currently offlineDL Widget Head From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 2094 posts, RR: 5
Reply 21, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 3823 times:

I agree. "Air Crash Investigation", "Seconds From Disaster", and "Air Emergency" have all been first rate. I set my recorder for them if I'm not home. They are very detailed and yet get to the point of why and how things happen. Very insightful.

User currently offlineTomys From Czech Republic, joined Mar 2005, 88 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 3647 times:

They are now showing this

http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19950821-0


User currently offlineGeoffm From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 2111 posts, RR: 6
Reply 23, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3631 times:

"Seconds from disaster" is fairly good, if only they cut out all the repeated segments. What they cover in an hour could easily be condensed into a 40 minute programme - without losing anything.

For example, one programme they did was on Eschede where the German ICE train derailed and brought down a concrete bridge on itself. One segment there was getting repeated over and over, so I started to count. By the end of the programme I counted 19 (nineteen) repetitions of the same segment - and it had been repeated many a time before that.

Dumbing down, to allow slower people to digest information, or padding to fill an hour?

Geoff M.


User currently offlineTomys From Czech Republic, joined Mar 2005, 88 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3608 times:

It's such frustrating to see this happening, they had an airport 6 km away and they had to land in the field...

25 Tomys : Geoffm, I agree with your comment, your example is good. I honestly don't know why they are doing this... Probably to fill 45 minutes of film...
26 777STL : But that's very easy to monday morning quarterback after the fact, isn't? I'll give him the benefit of the doubt, I wasn't there nor am I an expert o
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Crash Science On National Geographic Now! posted Fri Oct 20 2006 02:27:44 by JAM747
AA A300 Crash On National Geographic Tonight. posted Thu Sep 7 2006 02:38:48 by JAM747
TV Alert - A380 On The National Geographic Channel posted Thu Dec 1 2005 23:50:18 by Stlgph
British Midland 92 Crash On National Geographic posted Mon Sep 26 2005 02:14:53 by PipoA380
Inside 9-11, National Geographic Channel Tonight posted Mon Aug 22 2005 03:00:22 by STT757
Aircrash Investigation On TV. UK, Channel 5 posted Mon Jun 20 2005 13:20:15 by Summa767
National Geographic's "Air Emergency" posted Wed May 11 2005 03:59:16 by Delta717
AV52 On National Geographic (Air Crash Invest.) posted Sun Apr 17 2005 21:15:51 by ACVitale
"Air Emergency" On National Geographic posted Wed Apr 13 2005 15:42:36 by Jpz1991
National Geographic Contributor Research On TWA800 posted Tue Mar 1 2005 21:22:47 by SN-A330