Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
LCC's Not Always LowestCC  
User currently offline777DadandJr From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 1516 posts, RR: 12
Posted (9 years 6 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1740 times:

G'day All!

Here is an interesting comparison for you.

I am going to Seattle in June and was researching flights. My first thought was to take WN from BWI. Figured it would be the best deal.
I live in York Pa and MDT (Harrisburg Int'l) is closer, but usually more $$ because it is a smaller airport.
Anyway, I check out WN from BWI to SEA. Then I looked into flying from MDT to SEA. To my surprise, UA from MDT-SEA, connecting in ORD was $230.00 cheaper than WN (for 3 seat)!
So, for my $230.00 savings, what did I get?

1: 1/2 hour to the airport instead of 1 1/2
2: IFE
3: In flight meals
4: Assigned seating, MY choice!
5: opportunity to sample 3 types of a/c instead of 1 (CRJ, 777, 757) vs 737 only
6: Miles of smiles!  Big thumbs up

It pays to shop. LCC's are not always the LowestCC's !

Russ


My glass is neither 1/2 empty nor 1/2 full, rather, the glass itself is twice as big as it should be.
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17450 posts, RR: 46
Reply 1, posted (9 years 6 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1696 times:

I think everyone forgets that LCC refers to lowest cost, not lowest revenue/ticket price.


E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineNASBWI From Bahamas, joined Feb 2005, 1311 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 6 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1680 times:

Quoting MaverickM11 (reply 1):
I think everyone forgets that LCC refers to lowest cost, not lowest revenue/ticket price.


Very true. A friend of mine that lives in Seattle booked a ticket on UA for about a hundred dollars less than WN to fly to the Balt/Wash area. The same with a cousin of a friend of mine; he paid far less on AS to fly here than WN. The only drawback to flying either UA or AS is that neither airlines fly into BWI (for the price they paid), but instead to IAD - for anyone that lives in Baltimore, you KNOW what kind of trouble that can be getting out there to pick them up!! hahaha, good times on I-95/495.

George



Fierce, Fabulous, and Flawless ;)
User currently offline777DadandJr From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 1516 posts, RR: 12
Reply 3, posted (9 years 6 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1669 times:

Quoting NASBWI (reply 2):
The only drawback to flying either UA or AS is that neither airlines fly into BWI (for the price they paid), but instead to IAD - for anyone that lives in Baltimore, you KNOW what kind of trouble that can be getting out there to pick them up!! hahaha, good times on I-95/495.


I concure, George. The same hold true for folks in my area. Flying out of MDT is much less of a hassle than BWI. Besides being closer, at MDT the parking is much cheaper, the terminal is smaller and brand new and it only takes about 10 minutes to get from checkin, through security and to your gate.

Russ



My glass is neither 1/2 empty nor 1/2 full, rather, the glass itself is twice as big as it should be.
User currently offlineFoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 2996 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (9 years 6 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1661 times:

I have often found JetBlue's lowest fares out of NY to be higher than the lowest fares offered by the "full fare" carriers.

I think what people often don't realize is that the difference between the LCCs and the legacies is not so much with respect to the lowest fares offered, but rather the highest fares offered. The major airlines have always offered pretty decent fares in most (i.e., non-monopoly) markets, provided you buy well in advance, include a Saturday night stay, and book a round trip. However, if you take away any (or all) of those factors, the prices skyrocket.

The LCCs, by contrast, generally sell tickets on a one-way basis. There may be a discount for advance purchase, but a round trip or a Saturday night stay is rarely required. So, when you compare the fares for a walk-up one-way ticket, the LCCs are almost always much lower.

Note that this is starting to change--Delta's fare overhaul, for example, has addressed many of these differences, bringing their fare structure more in line with the LCCs.



Common sense is not so common. -Voltaire
User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 5, posted (9 years 6 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1657 times:

Its low cost, not necessarily low fare.

N


User currently offlineM404 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 2226 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (9 years 6 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1609 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Some carriers are called LCCs because it's cost them less to produce a seat mile, sell it, and make a profit.

Many carriers can sell a seat at a low price below what it costs to produce and lose a bundle.

Market share vs market reality



Less sarcasm and more thought equal better understanding
User currently offlineExFATboy From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2974 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (9 years 6 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1516 times:

FoxBravo's hit the nail on the head - LCCs will (almost) always beat a "legacy" carrier on walk-up fares, but on advance purchase, the majors compete aggressively.

I fly NYC-Tampa several times a year, and for advance purchases AA is frequently cheaper than JetBlue. Even if they're the same price, it's cheaper to get to LGA than JFK (if you have a lot of bags and have to take a cab or black car), so AA wins.

DL also frequently beats B6 for advance purchase from NYC-Florida as well, but I usually don't fly them (nothing against DL, I've always been fond of them, just FF mile management.  Smile )


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
LCC Not Gold All That Glitters posted Mon Feb 19 2007 01:09:42 by Bullpitt
Wright Or Not - LCC Not Interested In DAL posted Sat Mar 11 2006 19:42:32 by DALNeighbor
Mexican LCC's Not Really LCC's posted Fri Oct 14 2005 21:33:02 by BGOODAM
Low Fare Airlines Do Not Always Offer Lowest Fares posted Wed Oct 6 2004 19:59:28 by Jacobin777
Not An LCC, Not Yet A Legacy Carrier posted Thu Jun 24 2004 23:38:58 by Northwest717
Not Always Things Run As Mooth As Silk posted Sat Mar 20 2004 13:15:32 by Wing
1st Class...not Always Better For Aviation Buffs? posted Mon Apr 15 2002 02:58:08 by SJCguy
Bigger Is NOT Always Better! posted Fri Sep 28 2001 22:49:29 by Md11_man
GOL Is NOT A LCC! posted Fri Jun 24 2005 21:30:34 by TP727
Why Not Make Oberpfaffenhofen/MUC An LCC Hub? posted Mon Mar 7 2005 17:46:30 by Mozart