Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Legacies And The B787-One Way To Stay Profitable?  
User currently offlineAdipasqu From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 238 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2826 times:

I know purchasing or leasing new B787's to replace B767's would require a ton of capitol that none of the US Legacy carriers have right now. My question is, if a 20% decrease in fuel burn is realized with the B787 over the B767, at what point (i.e. how expensive does oil have to get...US$70 a barrel?) would any airline, including those under BK protection, have to look at the 20% decrease in fuel burn and replacing an entire B767 fleet as the only way to stay profitable? For those airliners under BK protections, could creditors require and bankroll a radical fleet change, such as a large B787 order, in order to stop the bleeding caused by incredibly high fuel prices?


707 722 732 733 734 735 73G 738 739 741 742 752 753 762 763 764 D9S D10 319 320 321 M80 M82 M83 M87 M88 M90 SF3 ERJ CRJ
2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDAYflyer From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3807 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (9 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2812 times:

Sometimes it is neccessary to spend money to make money, but I don't think that applies here. The fuel saving would easily be eaten up by the lease or purchase cost. As for the 767, it is cheaper to keep an airplane you own than to buy/lease a new one, even if it cost you more in fuel. This is the sole reason the DC-9 is still around with NW.

Is it cheaper to run and own a car with no payments but that requires more fuel and maint, or is it cheaper to make a car payment, pay less in fuel and near zero in maint?

It is always cheaper when you dont have a payment.



One Nation Under God
User currently offlineBoeing7E7 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2791 times:

Three things with the 787 will help carriers:

1. Reduction in fuel burn of a direct replacement - same capacity aircraft which the airlines are capable of filling on a regular basis today. This reduces the one uncontrollable cost.. Fuel.

2. The pricepoint of the 787 is actually cheaper in todays dollars than the 767 family and 757-300, thus Reduced capital cost. Lease rates will be no more than the 767's in use on leases. Fact is, a 767 bought at it's launch time now costs just as much to operate as the last 767 that rolled off the line as a result of increased maintenance and fuel costs.

3. Reduced maintenance cost over the 767 family.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
And The Route Authority Goes To..... posted Mon Dec 4 2006 04:55:14 by Style
Airbus And Boeing On Their Way To Iran? posted Tue Jun 6 2006 17:14:25 by PM
US And The LAS Hub: Ready To Go International? posted Sat Dec 31 2005 05:49:17 by D L X
Air France/KLM And The B787 posted Sun May 8 2005 00:58:39 by Dhefty
PDX-SEA Over The Years, A Great Way To Experience posted Sun Feb 20 2005 22:13:03 by RWA380
Needing A One Way To Europe? posted Fri Dec 31 2004 03:27:04 by Padcrasher
How Cheap Is Cheap Out Of SEA One Way To MSP posted Fri May 28 2004 21:52:20 by Pilot727aa
More Than One Way To Lower Capacity? posted Sun Mar 30 2003 06:52:19 by Mattnrsa
Whatwould Be The Best/cheapest Way To Get ToMoroco posted Wed May 22 2002 18:47:49 by Westjet_8
London To The UAE From £110 One-way All-in posted Sat Apr 22 2006 21:14:18 by Pe@rson