Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Air Canada Denied Service To Lebanon  
User currently offlineETStar From Canada, joined Jan 2004, 2103 posts, RR: 7
Posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 5075 times:

Decision No. 129-A-2005
March 8, 2005
APPLICATION by Air Canada, pursuant to subsection 69(1) of the Canada Transportation Act, S.C., 1996, c. 10, for a licence to operate a scheduled international service, large aircraft between points in Canada and points in Lebanon.
File No. M4210/A74-4-69

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Air Canada (hereinafter the applicant) has applied to the Canadian Transportation Agency (hereinafter the Agency) for a licence to operate the service set out in the title. The application was received on November 8, 2004.

In order to obtain a licence, the applicant must, inter alia, establish to the satisfaction of the Agency that it holds a Canadian aviation document and that it has the prescribed liability insurance coverage in respect of the service to be provided under the licence, as set out in subparagraphs 69(1)(a)(ii) and (iii) of the Canada Transportation Act (hereinafter the CTA).

Pursuant to subsection 29(1) of the CTA, the Agency is required to make its decision no later than 120 days after the application is received unless the parties agree to an extension. In this case, the applicant has indicated that it will not request an extension to the deadline.

The Agency has considered the material filed to date in support of the application and notes that the applicant does not hold a valid Canadian aviation document in respect of the operation of scheduled international services to/from Lebanon. The Agency is therefore not satisfied that the applicant meets the requirement of subparagraph 69(1)(a)(ii) of the CTA. Accordingly, the application by Air Canada is hereby denied.


Source: http://www.cta-otc.gc.ca/rulings-dec...decisions/2005/A/129-A-2005_e.html

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGothamSpotter From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 586 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 5054 times:

What does that mean? They couldn't find an insurer, or they just didn't want to pay for it? I would imagine liability insurance for flights to the Middle East must be insanely expensive these days.

User currently offlineSebring From Canada, joined Jul 2004, 1666 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 5032 times:

It means the Canadian government would not give AC the right to operate the service. AC was authorized in the summer of 2004 to launch service to BEY, but had the authority cancelled at literally the last minute, apparently for security concerns that remain nebulous to this day. Obviously, the government is not prepared at this point to reverse that decision. That's the aviation document in question. It is a recognition of bilateral authority issues by the federal government. I believe you could say that this was AC's attempt to prod the government into reviewing the file.

User currently offlineEnviroTO From Canada, joined Aug 2004, 829 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 4808 times:

That decision doesn't really explain anything. It basically says you can't fly to Lebanon because you don't have a permit to fly to Lebanon. The real question is how does Air Canada get a permit to fly to Lebanon... is that done behind closed doors with no publications such as the CTA has?

User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16368 posts, RR: 56
Reply 4, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 4794 times:

The memo is self-contradictory. AC is applying for a license to operate but does not hold a valid aviation document. WTF?????????????

Our tax dollars are paying for this mindless drivel in Ottawa. Incredible.



Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineSebring From Canada, joined Jul 2004, 1666 posts, RR: 14
Reply 5, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 4753 times:

It would appear that whatever the reasons, the government is not prepared to disclose them even to AC. Therefore, AC tries again for the authority. The application was received in November and only dismissed now, which is also intriguing, since it never takes that long to rule on these types of applications. The CTA appears to have taken its sweet time with this one, passing it around to other govt departments or even Cabinet to get guidance.

User currently offlinePadcrasher From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 4724 times:

If Canada would stop meddling in other countries affairs these countries might be more accomodating! Here that Canada?!

User currently offlineYUL332LX From Canada, joined Feb 2004, 820 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 4724 times:

Quoting Sebring (Reply 2):
AC the right to operate the service. AC was authorized in the summer of 2004 to launch service to BEY, but had the authority cancelled at literally the last minute, apparently for security concerns that remain nebulous to this day


That was in 2003  Wink



E volavo, volavo felice più in alto del sole, e ancora più su mentre il mondo pian piano spariva lontano laggiù ...
User currently offlinePadcrasher From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 4712 times:

that of course was a joke

Canada is A-OK


User currently offlineYegbey01 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 1732 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 4472 times:

well,
if all goes well in lebanon and syria gets out...expect AC to be blessing the runways of BEY right away....


User currently offlineFLYYUL From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 5010 posts, RR: 51
Reply 10, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 4336 times:

Syria will never leave Lebanon... wishful thinking  Sad

User currently offlineYUL332LX From Canada, joined Feb 2004, 820 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 4059 times:

The government confirmed yesterday that it was a matter national security.  crazy 

TC has mentioned that various agencies including the RCMP, CSIS and the Canadian Border Services Agency were all involved in the decision...



E volavo, volavo felice più in alto del sole, e ancora più su mentre il mondo pian piano spariva lontano laggiù ...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
When Does Air Canada Starts Service To BOG? posted Thu Apr 15 2004 05:38:07 by MATURRO727
Air Canada Resumes Service To Israel! posted Tue Mar 25 2003 17:46:42 by ScottysAir
Air Arabia Starting Service To Armenia posted Thu Nov 2 2006 16:37:43 by 777way
Air Canada..Charging U.S. Taxes To Yanks 'nCanada? posted Thu Jul 13 2006 10:02:22 by FireFly
Air Canada Expands More To China! posted Tue Jun 20 2006 20:45:05 by QXatFAT
Air Canada's A345 Where To? posted Wed Feb 1 2006 09:25:54 by BoeingFever777
Air Canada A320 Headed To DAL posted Tue Jan 3 2006 17:05:51 by Texan
Air Canada B762, Minneapolis To Leipzig - Why? posted Mon Nov 14 2005 19:53:03 by RobK
Air Canada FIN 601 To Storage posted Fri Sep 16 2005 01:29:33 by AC7E7
Air Canada. Why Not To MAD Again? posted Fri Sep 9 2005 21:55:47 by Anxebla