Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
United Aircraft Dammage In YYC  
User currently offlinePlanekrazy777 From Canada, joined Aug 2004, 57 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 4 months 3 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 3285 times:

On tues eve an united crj-7,9 not sure what model, suffered aircraft dammage due to new jetways installed with ground power unit. after the aircraft was offloaded and grommed for the eve, an employee pulled the jetway away from aircraft whille g.p.u. was still attached. there was noticeable dammage to nose gear doors. and the ground power was ripped off from bridge, will this aircraft be grounded for a while or will they just do a temp fix job and ferry it back to the usa.

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBiggles From Canada, joined Dec 2004, 459 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (9 years 4 months 3 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 3246 times:

That would explain the United RJ parked at the Avmax hangar today.It did some taxiing about 2 hours ago.It's either inside the hangar now or back at the Terminal. It's not outside the hangar anymore.

User currently offlineBO__einG From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 2770 posts, RR: 18
Reply 2, posted (9 years 4 months 3 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 2904 times:

Is it in new colours or the old?


Chance favors the prepared mind.
User currently offlineYOW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (9 years 4 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2686 times:

Who is the manufacturer of the new loading bridges at YYC. For the new loading bridges at YOW, which were built by Dew Engineering, it is impossible to move the bridge if the GPU is attached to the aircraft. I'm surprised YYC's bridges don't have the same safety feature.

User currently offlineBiggles From Canada, joined Dec 2004, 459 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (9 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 2540 times:

It was in the old colours.

User currently offlineWJV04 From Canada, joined Jun 2001, 583 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 2323 times:

Ok, the aircraft involved was in fact in new colors (I saw the damaged aircraft up close and personal).

Im not sure of the manufacturer of the bridges, however the GPU cord is lowered down from these bridges using a cable hoist system. If the cable hoist is down even a inch, the bridge cannot be moved with the execption of the auto-leveling system which adjusts the bridge height acording to the movements of the aircraft during loading and unloading. The cable is easily removed from the hoist using 2 standard carabeener clips. The ground power cord does not need to be attached to the hoist for the hoist to go up or down.

It was my assumtion that the aircraft was a RON flight. And this had happened shortly before departure in the morning.

What probally had happened, is Air Canada (united's ramp contractor in Calgary) had lowered the hoist and ground power and then detached the GPU from the clips on the hoist, and the hoist was put back up. The aircraft arrived GPU was plugged in for the evening. The next morning with the hoist still being in the up position the CSA moved the bridge back for departure and you know what happens next. However I can tell you these ground power cables are half decently long, and the only was for this to happen was the bridge must have been moving all the way back to the home position, which on gate 31(where the accident occured) is a good 70+ feet back from the CRJ hash mark.

I have a feeling this is just due to the fact that Air Canada rarely ever uses these more modern bridges. In fact its the second time I have ever seen them using gates C/D 31-34.

Here at Westjet we have strict policys on having the hoist down a inch or so when ever the ground power is not clipped to the hoist and GPU plugged in to the aircraft.


User currently offlineBiggles From Canada, joined Dec 2004, 459 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 2269 times:

My bad . The old colours UA CRJ at at Amax must have been there for an inspection. There is presently a new colours CRJ at the Avmax hangar (regn N7155K I think,it's dark ! ) .The acft's nose is in the hangar.

User currently offlineBiggles From Canada, joined Dec 2004, 459 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2101 times:

Just an update. Correct regn is N715SK , and 24 hrs later,the acft is still nosed into the hangar.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Which United Aircraft I Took In 2002? posted Fri Jan 2 2004 22:14:26 by Mxp
United Aircraft In Old Paint? posted Mon Jul 8 2002 18:47:01 by Ordual24
Aircraft Assembly In Saudi? posted Sat Oct 28 2006 20:01:10 by HiJazzey
Aircraft Going In Circles Shortly After Takeoff posted Thu Oct 26 2006 20:18:49 by Quickmover
Why Do United's Aircraft Always Look Bigger? posted Tue Oct 24 2006 16:42:36 by Gh123
Small Aircraft Crashes In Northern Brazil posted Mon Oct 2 2006 19:39:50 by Antiuser
Light Aircraft Crashes In Snowdonia, North Wales posted Tue Sep 12 2006 23:49:29 by SteveBerch
JAL In YYC - Why? posted Tue Aug 8 2006 16:40:06 by Jgardiner
All-male United Airlines Flights In The 60s posted Mon Jul 31 2006 21:16:56 by Incitatus
Light Aircraft Crash In Southend On Sea posted Wed Jul 19 2006 19:18:00 by Lapper