Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
NWA To Drop 24 DC-9's  
User currently offline9844 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 199 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 4154 times:

Aviation Daily


Northwest To Ground 18% Of DC-9 Fleet, Cut Mechanics
03/18/2005 09:03:40 AM
By Steven Lott

Northwest plans to ground 24 DC-9s in addition to the six already targeted to stop flying this year, causing the loss of as many as 900 mechanic jobs in its hometown.

The airline told employees that its decision is due to record-high fuel prices, U.S. domestic overcapacity and fare competition. As of Feb. 14, NW was operating 166 DC-9s, according to the Airclaims fleet database, and most had an average age of about 35 years. The aircraft, all owned, have been reliable but are inefficient gas-guzzlers.

Because it plans to ground about 18% of the DC-9 fleet, NW will close one heavy maintenance check line at Minneapolis/St. Paul, eliminating 130 mechanic jobs by May. The decision also will result in the closing of two maintenance lines operated by San Antonio Aerospace.

While the timing is still being worked out, NW warned that about 700-800 additional Minneapolis-based mechanic jobs could be cut.

Aviation Week, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies.

31 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineElwood64151 From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 2477 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 4091 times:

I'm betting that the smallest, oldest DC-9s are the ones being grounded. That allows them to keep the larger aircraft so they can spread the cost of fuel over more passengers.

p.s. PLEASE DO NOT TURN THIS INTO A NW DC-9 REPLACEMENT THREAD!!!



Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it in summer school.
User currently offlineNW7E7 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 533 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 4056 times:

Does anybody know how many A319/A320 aircraft they have coming this year? Looks like they will have to cut some flights!

User currently offlineIowaman From United States of America, joined May 2004, 4365 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 4007 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Quoting NW7E7 (Reply 2):
Does anybody know how many A319/A320 aircraft they have coming this year? Looks like they will have to cut some flights!

I believe they have a few A319/A320 coming thi year, but not many. A lot of cities with DC-9's now will be replaced with CRJ's.



Next flights: WN DSM-LAS-PHX, US PHX-SJD. Return: US SJD-PHX, WN PHX-MDW-DSM
User currently offlineDAL767400ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3989 times:

Quoting Elwood64151 (Reply 1):
PLEASE DO NOT TURN THIS INTO A NW DC-9 REPLACEMENT THREAD!!!

No need to do so anyway, as this news release indicates that for most of them there won't be a replacement at all  Wink .
Not that surprising that NW is retiring DC-9s. Sure they are well-maintained and paid for, but at the same time NW has overcapacity and the DC-9s are fuel guzzlers, so it's perfect sense to retire them.


User currently offlineGoBoeing From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 2682 posts, RR: 14
Reply 5, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3958 times:

There are two A-320s and ten A-319s yet to be delivered.

Nick


User currently offlineNWAFA From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 1893 posts, RR: 16
Reply 6, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3952 times:

Some of the DC9's are already parked. It is just being included in that number...still don't like to hear that!


THANK YOU FOR FLYING NORTHWEST AIRLINES, WE TRULY APPRECIATE YOUR BUSINESS!
User currently offlinePHLBOS From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 7511 posts, RR: 24
Reply 7, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3924 times:

Quoting Elwood64151 (Reply 1):
I'm betting that the smallest, oldest DC-9s are the ones being grounded.

I believe the DC-9-10s (a.k.a. Baby 9s) have already been retired; which leaves NW's current DC-9 fleet consisting of a mixture of -30/40/50s. That being said, it will probably be the oldest ones of the fleet (regardless of type) being grounded/retired.



"TransEastern! You'll feel like you've never left the ground because we treat you like dirt!" SNL Parady ad circa 1981
User currently offlineA350 From Germany, joined Nov 2004, 1100 posts, RR: 22
Reply 8, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3923 times:

It is a step to finish the paradox situation that the USA aviation market has huge overcapacities on one hand but sees operations of extremely old a/c like the 35 years old DC-9 on the other hand. It's just normal. However, I'm sorry for the people who lose their jobs.

A350



Photography - the art of observing, not the art of arranging
User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13035 posts, RR: 12
Reply 9, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3901 times:

From this press release, it seems that their schedule of ending the use of the DC-9's has been speeded up not just to high fuel usage, but also to cut out the specific mechanics and facilities needed to maintain them. I am quite sure these DC-9's require more frequent maintainence than their much younger RJ's, A-319's and better fit the pax demands. I would also suspect that higher fuel costs and maintaince of them vs. the RJ's has be figured by the bean counters to tip the balance into removing them from the fleet. While I am sad to see these proud birds grounded, business reality has done them in. I just hope this ends the NW DC-9 threads  Wink

User currently offlineFlaps From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 1258 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3831 times:

Age wont necessarily determine which ones go first. It will be the maintenence schedule that makes that decision. Those coming due for heavy maintenance checks will be the first out.

User currently offlineSlider From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 6785 posts, RR: 34
Reply 11, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3810 times:

This is a heck of an appetizer for the upcoming AMFA negotiations.

I'll go on record right now and say that the mechanics' negotiations will get stupid.


User currently offlineElwood64151 From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 2477 posts, RR: 6
Reply 12, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3799 times:

Quoting A350 (Reply 8):
It is a step to finish the paradox situation that the USA aviation market has huge overcapacities on one hand but sees operations of extremely old a/c like the 35 years old DC-9 on the other hand

It's not a paradox. Those aircraft are paid for. NW didn't need to spend money to replace them because they worked well enough. Sure they were gas-guzzlers, but they weren't mortgaged like their new aircraft almost certainly are. That allowed NW to keep cash in its pockets at a time of deep financial stress.

Quoting Flaps (Reply 10):
It will be the maintenence schedule that makes that decision. Those coming due for heavy maintenance checks will be the first out.

I hadn't thought of that, but you are likely correct.



Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it in summer school.
User currently offlinePVD757 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3411 posts, RR: 17
Reply 13, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 3763 times:

As of last summer NW had 8 DC9-14/15's (none parked), 113 DC9-31/32 (10 parked and 11 are leased), 12 DC9-41 (none parked, only 1 leased) and 35 DC9-51 (all owned with 3 parked). I'm sure the -10's and anything parked or leased will be part of this retirement (that would only equal 23), whereas some of the oldest remaining ships or ones due up for heavy mx will account for the rest.

User currently offlineBR715-A1-30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3607 times:

Actually, IMO, I would think they would drop the -40s and -50s first since they have MORE -30s, they can save on Fleet Commonality there... But that is just my  twocents 

User currently offlineA350 From Germany, joined Nov 2004, 1100 posts, RR: 22
Reply 15, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3503 times:

Quoting Elwood64151 (Reply 12):
It's not a paradox. Those aircraft are paid for. NW didn't need to spend money to replace them because they worked well enough

I was speaking about the macro-economical situation, not about the micro-economical one. It IS paradox when DC-9s are operated and A320s sit in the dessert. However, it was very wise from NW not to order too many planes during the boom but to order them NOW, after the boom. The result, however, is still that the old birds are going to the dessert and the A320s, T7s etc. come back.

A350



Photography - the art of observing, not the art of arranging
User currently offlinePHLBOS From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 7511 posts, RR: 24
Reply 16, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3474 times:

Quoting A350 (Reply 15):
The result, however, is still that the old birds are going to the dessert and the A320s, T7s etc. come back.

I didn't know that NW flew T7s.  Confused



"TransEastern! You'll feel like you've never left the ground because we treat you like dirt!" SNL Parady ad circa 1981
User currently offlineNLINK From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 313 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3437 times:

There was a rumor that the 12 dc9-40 would be sold to ABX air. Not sure if there was any truth to that rumor though.

User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 18, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3409 times:

Quoting BR715-A1-30 (Reply 14):
Actually, IMO, I would think they would drop the -40s and -50s first since they have MORE -30s, they can save on Fleet Commonality there...

They're all DC-9s. They're all common.

N


User currently offlineKarlB737 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3094 posts, RR: 10
Reply 19, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3262 times:

Courtesy: WCCO-TV - Mechanics Voicing Frustration With NWA

http://wcco.com/topstories/local_story_077123040.html


Video Report - Courtesy: WCCO-TV

http://wccoimg.dayport.com/htm/wcco4player.htm?Art_ID=5914


Video Report - Courtesy: KSTP-TV

http://kstp.dayport.com/viewer/viewerpage.php?Art_ID=161036


User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7521 posts, RR: 28
Reply 20, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3257 times:

All the remaining DC-9-10's, 8 of them, were retired in January when the new RVSM regulations went into effect. A few -30's were retired then. The current active DC-9 fleet count is 151, with about 6-7 in storage in MZJ. These aircraft were to return to service this year, but will now be retired.
The 24 aircraft will not all be parked at once, it will be phased across the year as they become due for maintenance. Several will go by June, then more at the end of the busy summer season and throughout the fall. The problematic aircraft, ones that become due for maintenance, damaged a/c will go first.

There will not be a large-scale conversion of routes over to the Airlinks. NW can still maintain most of its narrowbody flying by increasing utilization of its existing aircraft. There has been slack in the DC-9 fleet for a while now, and there is room to increase Airbus utilization too. I believe 6 new A319/A320 are coming online this year. Along with another 18 or CRJ's to be delivered by fall. You won't likely see any city lose mainline flying, but certain frequencies throughout the day will be adjusted to match capacity with demand. Thus some CRJ's & Avro's may show up in some places.

Slider,
The AMFA negotiations are already getting stupid. Check out this press release issued today:
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/050318/northwest_layoffs_2.html

Hmm, coincidence on the timing, TIMCO over in Singapore has been used for years to maintain the DC-10 fleet, why now is it suddenly a problem?
This is going to be an all out war between these two sides, the gloves have already come off.

Not a good week for NW, first the JD Powers b.s. survey, then the capacity reductions, and now AMFA attempting to scare the public.....


User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3238 times:

Sad news for the 900 mechanics and their families, hopefully the market recovers quickly.

User currently offlineRedtailmsp From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 206 posts, RR: 2
Reply 22, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 4 days ago) and read 2997 times:

As PSU, etc says, the number of aircraft being taken out of service per NWA's recent press release involves a gradual reduction as DC9s come up on heavy maint checks. There are currently several spare aircraft in the fleet being used as back-ups, so come the Fall, there will be less spares in DTW/MSP. There will be a seasonal reduction in flying in the Fall, so this is a logical time to take aircraft out of service. Look for a couple of 747-200s to be parked too as well as perhaps up to 6 total DC10's - although this number seems to fluctuate up and down frequently. Arrivals for this year are 3 A330-300s in May/July/Oct and I think 2 more A319s (there were already 2 new ones delivered in Feb 05). I think the timing of this announcement may well be a shot across the bows of AMFA - all the airlines seeking concessions drop hints or veiled threats about cutbacks, and NWA is no saint in this regard.

User currently offlineAviatorTJ From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1838 posts, RR: 7
Reply 23, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 2946 times:

Whatever happened to Dick getting rid of the DC-9-50s. In the middle of 2003, he was working to get those ones out of the fleet for whatever reason. It is quite obvious that it never went through, but what were the reasons for switching that around? Is it possible that Doug could have some tricks up his sleeve for future fleet planning, including removing a series of the nines such as a 40 (per reply 17) or a 50 since Dick had wanted to before?

-TJ


User currently offlineTiger119 From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1919 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2575 times:

Quoting LTBEWR (Reply 9):
I just hope this ends the NW DC-9 threads

- Wanna bet this isn't the end of that?  Wink



Flying is the second greatest thrill known to mankind, landing is the first!
25 BEG2IAH : NW is getting rid of its DC-9s? Air France's planes look cleaner on the latest pictures uploaded to A.Net. We won't have anything to talk about pretty
26 Access-Air : As Elwood54151 said, "It's not a paradox. Those aircraft are paid for. NW didn't need to spend money to replace them because they worked well enough.
27 NWADC9 : They have been for a while.
28 Flyabunch : I'll tell you, I am sure not seeing the so-called over capacity on any of my routes. 24 flights so far this year and all full or near full. Four fligh
29 WhiteHatter : Do you really not understand the ramifications of the oil price issue? Here's a clue. You won't be seeing oil under fifty dollars a barrel again, any
30 MidnightMike : Not everybody will lose their jobs, there will be transfers and others may simply retire, if they are old enough...
31 Post contains images BEG2IAH : NWADC9, Do you think I was serious? BEG2IAH
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Nwa To Ground 727 & Dc-10-40's? posted Fri Sep 14 2001 22:48:22 by Favre
Virgin To Drop Nassau? posted Mon Nov 27 2006 22:45:35 by BestWestern
Airbus: "No Plans" To Drop A380 Freighter posted Fri Nov 17 2006 11:02:24 by PanAm_DC10
NWA To Borrow Up To $779 Million To Refinance Jets posted Wed Nov 8 2006 21:29:36 by KarlB737
Gatx To Drop Leasing Unit, Will Sell 87 Aircraft posted Sat Sep 30 2006 18:50:22 by Leelaw
NWA To Recall All FA's posted Thu Sep 7 2006 01:44:04 by NWADTWFA
Is BA Looking To Drop Domestic Routes? posted Fri Aug 4 2006 10:14:28 by Drinkstrolley
Azerbaijan Airlines To Drop Kabul posted Wed Aug 2 2006 21:23:48 by 777way
AMFA/NWA To Return To Negotiations August 15th posted Fri Jul 28 2006 04:52:04 by Saabmeister
CO To Take 24 Q400... posted Thu Jul 6 2006 14:55:17 by Flying-Tiger