Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Qantas 744ER  
User currently offlineFlydc10 From Mexico, joined Aug 2004, 82 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 1724 times:

HELLO

I WAS WONDERING WHY DID QANTAS ORDERED THE 747-400ER DID IT HELP THE AIRLINE IN ANY WAY, OPENING NEW LONG HAUL ROUTES OR IN SOME OTHER WAY.

REGARDS

FLYDC10


vivan nuestras aerolineas nacionales
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineKDTWFlyer From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 830 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 1709 times:

I think it made westbound LAX-MEL nonstops possible without payload restrictions although im not sure on this.


NW B744 B742 B753 B752 A333 A332 A320 A319 DC10 DC9 ARJ CRJ S340
User currently offlineFlydc10 From Mexico, joined Aug 2004, 82 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 1701 times:

THANX

BUT DIDN'T QANTAS OPERATE LAX-MEL BEFORE WITHOUT STOPS???? HOW MANY DAILY FLIGHTS CONNECT AUSTRALIA WITH THE US????

REGARDS
FLYDC10



vivan nuestras aerolineas nacionales
User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9169 posts, RR: 15
Reply 3, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 1656 times:

Yes they did... with the B 747-400 but with PAYLOAD RESTRICTIONS.

I think some of the B 747-400s still do LAX-MEL as well as LAX-SYD


User currently offlineAirxLiban From Lebanon, joined Oct 2003, 4512 posts, RR: 53
Reply 4, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 1612 times:

the 6 744ERs were bought primarily for the LAX-MEL routing.

welcome to a.net, but stop writing in CAPITALS



PARIS, FRANCE...THE BEIRUT OF EUROPE.
User currently offlinePhilSquares From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 1614 times:

Where you run into payload restrictions is if you need an alternate for MEL and Avalon isn't suitable. Now you have to use SYD which requires a good amount of fuel. LAX-SYD is in the same boat, if not worse, since MEL is technically the closest airport. However, I believe and I might be wrong, it's my understanding that QF has an exemption to use a closer RAAF base close to SYD. It's only a "paper" alternate, thus reducing the amount of alternate fuel that needs to be carried.

User currently offlineBill142 From Australia, joined Aug 2004, 8451 posts, RR: 8
Reply 6, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 1529 times:

Why wouldn't AVV be a suitable alternative? It can handle 744's and I think all cargo flights goto Avalon instead of Tullamarine do they not? Only reason I can think of as to why AVV wouldn't be a good alternative is the lack of passenger handling facilities for international flights such as Immigration etc.

Also it is rumored Qantas got these aircraft for next to nothing in attempt by Boeing to stop them from buying the A380, which they went on to buy any way. And it a bit of a slap to the face for Boeing annouced both orders plus orders for A330's at the same time.

[Edited 2005-03-20 08:58:21]

User currently offlineLightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 13134 posts, RR: 100
Reply 7, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 1492 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I couldn't find the web link, but when the ER came out the big deal is it allows for some cargo to be carried on SYD-LAX. The regular 400, as noted, has some severe payload restrictions on that flight.

Does anyone know the allowed cargo on a 388 SYD-LAX (and vice versa) vs. 744ER? I'm not trying to start A vs. B, but I would like do know after pax and luggage the difference in cargo for that route and this seems to be the appropriate live thread.

Thanks,
Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
User currently offlineStealthZ From Australia, joined Feb 2005, 5697 posts, RR: 44
Reply 8, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 1395 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Bill142 (Reply 6):
Why wouldn't AVV be a suitable alternative?

I would think that it is highly likely that extreme weather that made MEL unusable would likely affect AVV. I would expect AVV to be suitable for other MEL closures eg blocked runways etc. There are even PAX facilities at AVV although not the immigration and customs services you could get at SYD.

Regards

Chris



If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Qantas 744ER - How Long To Go? posted Fri Oct 25 2002 12:55:47 by QANTASpower
Qantas 744ER posted Wed Sep 11 2002 00:42:31 by Scott4AA
Qantas 744/744ER Cabin Layouts? posted Wed Dec 18 2002 02:29:52 by Donder10
First 744ER Delivered To Qantas Today posted Wed Oct 30 2002 23:58:29 by JFKTOWERFAN
Qantas Equipment Help posted Fri Nov 24 2006 10:22:43 by Andz
Qantas 743 IFE posted Thu Nov 23 2006 05:09:50 by Tmamtrak
Qantas In NRT posted Fri Nov 17 2006 18:30:48 by LordHowe
Qantas Now Fly To Brazil? posted Sat Nov 11 2006 00:20:11 by 747400sp
Qantas Takeover Rumor? posted Thu Nov 9 2006 12:52:58 by Anthonyspider
Qantas Accused Of Being A "Stalinist Regime" posted Mon Nov 6 2006 07:33:10 by Singapore_Air