EddieDude From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 7666 posts, RR: 41
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2205 times:
Quoting FLY777UAL (Thread starter): would it be feasable to think that a US airline could operate MEX-SAN-NRT through flights capitalizing on traffic from all three cities?
That's a very interesting idea, but I don't think it would work too well (at least with respect to attracting Mexican flyers). For starters, Mexicans going only to SAN would rather fly AM because of its service superior to that of any of the U.S. legacies. Second, Mexicans going to NRT would prefer taking the JL MEX-YVR-NRT flight because of the hassle it has become to go through immigration in the U.S. after 9/11.
Okay, so AM flies to SAN with a stop in SJD. True, but I am sure AM would start a daily non-stop flight to SAN from MEX if a U.S. carrier decided to open this route in order to defend its market. And okay, so JL flies MEX-YVR-NRT only 2x weekly. That is true, but there are other alternatives for Mexicans like flying MX/AC via YVR.
Next flights: MEX-JFK-MEX AM 788 | MEX-JFK-FCO AM 788/AZ A332 | AMS-MEX 74M
DAL767400ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2204 times:
Quoting FLY777UAL (Thread starter): Furthermore, would it be feasable to think that a US airline could operate MEX-SAN-NRT through flights capitalizing on traffic from all three cities?
I seriously doubt that, because there are two factors that speak against such a routing. First, the whole deal with US immigration, that even if you don't leave the plane in SAN you still have to go through immigration etc, and second, SAN's airport is too short to allow a fully tanked widebody destined for NRT enough space for it's takeoff roll, plus the problem with the obstructions (read: Downtown) in the path of a 27 take-off.
Ktachiya From Japan, joined Sep 2004, 1838 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2009 times:
Quoting DAL767400ER (Reply 2): First, the whole deal with US immigration, that even if you don't leave the plane in SAN you still have to go through immigration etc
Yes; that's why I hear that from Asia, making a stop-over in Canda is so popular. At least for JL going to MEX it is. There was a post on that a few weeks ago. I'm sorry, I don't mean to offend the American immigration system but I from my past experiences, I am always freaked out when I go through immigrations (this happened to me a few times at LAX that I got stopped and got questioned, my suitcase opened, go through further questioning) and the line is so long it makes me feel claustrophobic. I personally would avoid US immigration unless my final destination is the US.
PanAm747 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 4242 posts, RR: 8
Reply 6, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 1844 times:
Unfortunately, the reason that BA pulled out of SAN (temporarily, or so they say) was due to VERY low yields in the business and first-class sections of the 777, and that's where the money is. Economy class always went out full, but yields in the Y-class are not good enough to justify one flight per day.
Also, as I understand it, code-shares with AA were not possible, but I'm clueless on that one - who on earth would connect through SAN? Not a terribly convenient point...
So, sadly, 747-400, 777, or 767, BA isn't likely to return. Nor is LH likely to start flying in, although an A340 would certainly be a sight to see skimming the eucalyptus trees of Balboa Park...
As for flights to México, one of the worst kept secrets in San Diego is TIJ. Flights from SAN to México are generally tourist-oriented, not business. For those wishing to fly to MEX, GDL, or a host of other airports, it's a simple matter of crossing the border at San Ysidro, a $10 cab ride to the airport (that's a guaranteed fare regardless of traffic), and then it's a domestic flight with no customs at the other end. In reverse, one does have to fight the lines at San Ysidro or Otay Mesa, but the savings in fares should more than make up for it.
In the future, Asia-bound flights might be possible from the 9000' foot long runway at SAN with the 787, and if BA purchases the plane, that could be economical enough for a return of flights to LHR. Right now, though, the airlines are more than satisfied feeding traffic through PHX, LAX, SFO, DEN, and ORD for international passengers. C'est la vie.
Pan Am:The World's Most Experienced Airline - P(oor) S(ailor's) A(irline): San Diego's Hometown Airline-Catch Our Smile!
My guess is that PIT will be the next NA LH destination because of Bayer, filling the belly of those planes would really be a plus for LH. I think that SAN is in the same boat as PHX was with LH; they can fill the planes, but yield is poo which equates to a shaky financial performer.