Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AF Concorde F-BVFD  
User currently offlineBoeingfever777 From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 409 posts, RR: 53
Posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3735 times:

I was reading a article or 2 and the article stated that AF F-BVFD "Foxtrot-Delta" was broken up in 1994 at CDG. Why did AF break-up and rid F-BVFD of service? Stated her final rev. flight was May 27th 1982. What happen to this a/c?

http://www.concordesst.com/pictures/fbvfd1.jpg

Thanks for any info on this a/c.


Faire du ciel le plus bel endroit de la terre.
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAirsicknessbag From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 4723 posts, RR: 34
Reply 1, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 3709 times:

http://www.concordesst.com/211.html


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Michel Gilliand




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Cabos




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Cabos
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Cabos



User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7408 posts, RR: 50
Reply 2, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 3583 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Good question. I believe it was because it had been sitting around in a state of disrepair for so long. Back in the early 80's parts for Concorde became scarce. AF, and BA had reduced levels of parts in the inventory. So a solution was made that the each of airline would part out the last Concorde recieved by each carrier. BA Concorde, G-BOAG was the one that BA stripped of it's parts and BVFD was AF's. And the above with AF. When the popularity of the Concorde began to rise for BA, they started parting out their pre-preduction Concorde, G-BBDG to put BOAG back in service. AF had already donated theirs F-WTSS to the museum at Le Bourget, so that wasn't available. Then over the years, extensive corrosian was found in many areas of the plane and was deemed not to be airworthy, so decision was to scrap it


Made from jets!
User currently offlineAa777jr From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 3520 times:

They needed parts for the other flyable Concordes. Regards.

User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13191 posts, RR: 77
Reply 4, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 3512 times:

Actually, BA used many parts from F-BVFD to bring OAG back, G-BBDG provided some support, after that DG was the main spares source.
OAG's time in storage (it had a rash of technical problems, was stored in 1981/2 period), included much robbing of parts, which in many cases had not been recorded, so putting it back in service was protracted to say the least.

But worth it, as OAG had the first of BA Concorde's major cabin refurbishing, including seat, decor, lavs and the 'Marilake' LCD cabin displays, replacing the Mach info only LEDs.
It also was the first Concorde in the all white version of the Landor livery, which in it's standard (and for me, insipid and dull grey form), had become the BA livery in late 1984, but on Concorde, without the grey it looked great, my favorite of all the Concorde liveries.

http://www.concordesst.com/214.html

With 7 aircraft (usually allowing for one in heavy maintenance), BA now expanded things, had full control (and all the costs too), and had hugely revamped marketing.
Charters followed thick and fast, including round the world ones and many other imaginative flights, though charters would only, at best, provide 9% of revenue. Damn good PR though.

With double daily JFK's well established, the thrice weekly IAD's were less popular, so from April 84 BA extended the IAD down to MIA, (a supersonic service, unlike the BN crewed DFW's in 1979/80), BGI later joined the schedules too.

For years, we in BA Concorde understood that F-BVFD was withdrawn in '82 due to it being heavier than the rest, due to repairs after a hard landing at Dakar in 1977, coupled with AF axing all scheduled routes except the daily JFK.

I now understand that FD's weight was not excessive, neither was handling adversely affected, in fact, in it's last year of service, G-BOAD burned more fuel than FD ever did (though OAD was due an Inter 'C' check until the retirement announcement, which would include re-rigging of the flight controls, improving fuel burn, as we found after OAG's Inter in late 2002).

So FD seemed to be withdrawn for economic reasons, BA, like mugs, purchased the intakes of FD years back, only then finding they had corrosion.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AF Concorde In Hawaii? posted Tue Sep 19 2006 07:57:38 by ConcordeGBOAD
AF Concorde F-BVFF To Be Moved At CDG posted Wed Sep 6 2006 23:53:45 by FlySSC
CO DC-10 And AF Concorde In One Pic posted Fri Dec 9 2005 11:15:22 by Airforum
AF Concorde F-BVFF "in The Air" Again ... posted Wed Dec 7 2005 11:25:09 by FlySSC
Which AF Concorde Visited TPA? posted Fri Nov 25 2005 23:43:17 by 727LOVER
AF Concorde F.BVFF News posted Sun Oct 16 2005 19:53:25 by Teva
AF Concorde In Reno, May 1993: Registration? posted Tue Feb 1 2005 22:48:00 by ConcordeBoy
AF Concorde F-BVFC @ Toulouse posted Fri Apr 9 2004 23:21:45 by APP
BA Concorde Vs. AF Concorde posted Thu Dec 4 2003 00:04:39 by A340pilot
Buy A Piece Of AF Concorde From €20 posted Wed Sep 10 2003 23:41:47 by Singapore_Air