Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Concorde, Why Not Australia?  
User currently offlineAirbus60 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (16 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 10850 times:

O.k, I think this topic has been brought up a number of times in the discussion room, but please, i need to know why Concorde cannot do flights to Australia.


4 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineQF1 From Australia, joined May 2014, 9 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (16 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 10727 times:

I think you will find that Concorde visits Sydney and Cairns, maybe once or twice a year.
It would be good to see BA flying there Concorde London-Sydney (or Melbourne). Would this be possible non-stop, and app how long would it take?
Also, the Concorde should visit Melbourne!!!!!!!!


User currently offlineVH-BZF From Australia, joined Oct 1999, 866 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (16 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 10708 times:

Many years ago (late 70's I think), SQ chartered the concorde to fly between London & Singapore, stopping at Bahrain. It ceased a short time later as countries were not tollerant of the sonic boom caused by the supersonic airliner.
Today the same applies, it is also very uneconomical to fly Concorde over such a distance with only 100 or so pax. The only market that can really sustain Concorde is LHR-JFK, & that has been proven by BA pulling Concorde out of Washington-Dulles & Miami. Air France also only operate (to my knowledge) their Concorde's between CDG & JFK.
Concorde will still & does operate charters to Sydney (& usually Auckland or Christchurch) as part of fly cruise type set ups, however you will never see it fly commercially or scheduled service to Sydney or Melbourne.

I will stand corrected if I am wrong, but this is my understanding!

Cheers - & I look fwd to flying Concorde one day myself!

Ansett Australia - (was) One of the worlds great airlines!
User currently offlineRyaneverest From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (16 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 10702 times:

BA also flies Concorde to Barbados.

If any airline (BA/AF) flew Concorde to Australia, that would be impossible to have that non-stop. The journey is too long for the Concorde. Let's assume it takes a stop in between: then it'll be going over Italy, Egypt, Iran, India, Indian Ocean, and a big portion of western Australia. This is why the route will not be implemented. The sonic boom is just too disturbing, and therefore you can now see Concorde flights are only applied on over-water routes (CDG-JFK or LHR-JFK).

Whenever the plane is not over water, it does not fly supersonic. This means an Air France Concorde will fly Mach 0.9x until it reaches the Atlantic. Before reaching eastern coast of USA, it reduces speed to subsonic.

User currently offlineMas777 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 1999, 2939 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (16 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 10675 times:

Although it would be a great service London-Oz by Concorder wouldn't really be much faster than the current one-stop service via SIN, BKK or KUL. Concorde's range is rather limited - so it will have to refuel twice along the way - losing time it would otherwise gain. The fuel it would burn would also deem the service uneconomical and fares would be exorbitant!

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
CH9 On US Flights Why Not Australia? posted Tue Aug 3 2004 10:50:01 by Malb777
Why Not Even One Airworthy Concorde? posted Fri Sep 15 2006 02:36:42 by YULspotter
Why Not More Winglets? posted Wed Dec 13 2006 07:57:28 by JetSet777
Ryanair: Why Not Charleroi-Stansted? posted Mon Dec 4 2006 17:46:46 by Spantax
Coloured Wings, Why Not More? posted Wed Nov 29 2006 22:00:21 by DHHornet
US-Russia; Why Not More US Airlines? posted Tue Nov 28 2006 13:49:15 by Ualcsr
Why Not Many BA To S. America posted Thu Nov 23 2006 14:29:14 by Amirs
British Airways @ Heathrow T3 Why Not Also At T2? posted Fri Nov 3 2006 13:52:08 by 8herveg
Why NOT -- AA To GEO And PMB? posted Sat Oct 28 2006 01:34:08 by AJMIA
LGW -why Not A Tunnel To Pier 2, North Terminal posted Tue Oct 24 2006 15:22:31 by TimRees