Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Not "Super-80" In Europe?  
User currently offlineDoona From Sweden, joined Feb 2005, 3772 posts, RR: 13
Posted (9 years 9 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3419 times:

Flying around both North America and Europe, I've noticed something peculiar. Right at the beginning of the safety briefings on an MD-80, in the US, F/As refer to the aircraft as the super-80, whilst they never do that in Europe.

I know that the MD-80 was dubbed super-80 when it was marketed by McDonnell Douglas, but how come that name didn't make it across the pond?

(And can some people pleas stop referring to the MD-80 series as DC-9-80, etc. It's like calling the B717 MD95...)

Cheers
Mats


Sure, we're concerned for our lives. Just not as concerned as saving 9 bucks on a roundtrip to Ft. Myers.
22 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGlidepath73 From Germany, joined Mar 2005, 1021 posts, RR: 44
Reply 1, posted (9 years 9 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 3365 times:

Hi Mats!
Maybe it became named like this because the stretch of the fuselage was one of the significant changes comparing to the former (DC-9-50) Series.
Remember, they called some of the DC-8's "Super DC-8", after they change the old engines to the CFM 56 engines. (Dc-8 Super-71 etc. Even the DC-8 got more and more stretched, as the it was with the DC-9 / MD-80 / MD-90.
I think the name "SUPER-80" was very often used in the US, but never became that popular here in Europe.

Regards,
Patrick



Aviation! That rocks...
User currently offlineSATL382G From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 9 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3344 times:

If you check out the type certificate it is in fact a DC-9-81, 82, 83.
It wasn't until the MD88 that they actually changed the name. Super-80... You must have been on AA right?


User currently offlineTriStar500 From Germany, joined Nov 1999, 4696 posts, RR: 42
Reply 3, posted (9 years 9 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3334 times:

Maybe other airlines have realized that by 21st century standards, the "Super 80" is not so "super" anymore, and therefore refrain from calling the MD-80 this way.
 duck 
And before someone wants to tear my head of, the Douglas family of twinjets is my favorite airliners besides the Ten Eleven.



Homer: Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!
User currently offlineCaptaink From Mexico, joined May 2001, 5109 posts, RR: 12
Reply 4, posted (9 years 9 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3308 times:

We have an old engine cover from BWIA at the back of the airport.. And it has the words "BWIA DC-9 Super80" printed on it.. SO I guess super 80 was used over here too.

Off topic though, I want that engine cover for the wall on my room. SInce BWIA doesn't fly MD-83's anymore I don't think they will need it. Am I crazy? LOL



There is something special about planes....
User currently offlineLvtmb From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 392 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (9 years 9 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 3291 times:

I believe that Super-80 was the name that AA used for its MD80-83 fleet. Airlines used to do that more often in the past. There were "Astrojets" and "Coronados" and "Whisperliners" and "Super-80s". I also got the impression that AA is moving away from that and referring to its Super-80s as "Boeing MD80".

MB


User currently offlineMilesrich From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2012 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (9 years 9 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 3292 times:

Super 80 is, to my knowledge, only used by American Airlines. The reasoning for this goes back to a time before American even flew the airplane. In the 1970's, American introduced Wide Body aircraft as 747 and DC-10 Luxury Liners. They then put new interiors in their 707 and 727 and called them Luxury Jets. Then AA 191 crashed at ORD on 5/25/79, and the Ten was grounded. After the grounding was lifted, the words DC-10 were removed from Americans signage and promotion. In 1982, McDonnell Douglas, in an almost panic to sell their latest version of the DC-9, the DC-9-80 series, made a proposal to American and TWA to lease them airplanes at bargain basement prices. If the airplanes did not perform up to MDD's promises, they could be returned. The airplane performed so well that American eventually ordered and took delivery of 275 aircraft. But marketing had a problem. D C NINE DASH EIGHTY is a mouthful, and the DC-9 had been around in various forms for 17 years. American did not want to their passengers and the public to think they were buying an "old" airplane, so they called the jet, the Super 80 Luxury Jet.

In the US today, in addition to AA, only Delta still operates the MD80 in any numbers. The Delta aircraft is called the MD-88 which, unlike AA's 82/83's, has a glass cockpit, and uprated engines. Delta calls their craft the MD-88, and has never used the Super 80 name, nor has Delta, which retired their last DC-9-32's with the delivery of sufficient MD-88's in 1992, ever referred to the airplane as a DC-9 Super 80. Additionally, by the time Delta was taking delivery of their fleet, MDD was no longer calling the plane a DC-9 either.


User currently offlineExFATboy From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2974 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (9 years 9 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3196 times:

Quoting Lvtmb (Reply 5):
There were "Astrojets" and "Coronados" and "Whisperliners" and "Super-80s". I also got the impression that AA is moving away from that and referring to its Super-80s as "Boeing MD80".

I sort of miss the old naming...last one I can remember was when PSA named the BAe-146 the "Smileliner." *sigh*

And I'd like to cast a vote right now for stamping out this business of calling old DC- and MD- aircraft "Boeings" now. I don't care if Boeing bought MDD. Chrysler dropped the Plymouth name, but we don't go around taking about all those great "Chrysler (or Dodge) RoadRunners" from the '70s, now do we? And GM's dropping the Oldsmobile name, but if anyone ever says "Chevy 442" I will slap them. Hard.

I'm willing to go along with Boeing 717, since the 717 was manufactured and (ineffectively) marketed for a long time after the merger. If someone wanted to be really pedantic and call a post-merger MD-11 a "Boeing", I might be willing to let the anal retentivity go.

But it's not a "Boeing" DC-9, MD-80, or whatever, it's a "McDonnell Douglas".

(Yes, I'm a little cranky this morning...)  silly 


User currently offlineOE-LDA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (9 years 9 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3182 times:

Austrian Airlines used the term "Super 80" too, when the aircraft was introduced in the early 80s.

Regards, OE-LDA


User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17172 posts, RR: 66
Reply 9, posted (9 years 9 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3123 times:

Quoting Doona (Thread starter):
I know that the MD-80 was dubbed super-80 when it was marketed by McDonnell Douglas, but how come that name didn't make it across the pond?

The name is still in use on the Eastern side of the pond


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Timo Mikkilä




"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineFlyingTexan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (9 years 9 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3099 times:

Quoting Milesrich (Reply 6):
American did not want to their passengers and the public to think they were buying an "old" airplane, so they called the jet, the Super 80 Luxury Jet.

Thank you, Milesrich, for the insight. A few years back I had a non-aviation co-worker connecting thru Dallas. He said “I assume American’s Super 80 is the same as other airlines’ MD-80.”

My reply - Yes, it is just American’s way of making you think their MD-80 is bigger/better/newer/nicer/faster than – say – Delta’s.


User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13748 posts, RR: 61
Reply 11, posted (9 years 9 months 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 3077 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

FWIW, at Alaska Airlines you'll only hear the term "MD-80" or "Boeing MD-80" used.


"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlineJetblue From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 393 posts, RR: 5
Reply 12, posted (9 years 9 months 3 days ago) and read 2918 times:

Quoting ExFATboy (Reply 7):
I can remember was when PSA named the BAe-146 the "Smileliner."

The Smileliner??? Holy cow. That is one of the ugliest, fat looking beasts in the sky today. The only time I smile is when I step off the darn thing.  Smile

jetBlue



We know for you it's not just a seat on a flight to a place. It's a seat on a flight to your life.
User currently offlineAirsicknessbag From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 4723 posts, RR: 33
Reply 13, posted (9 years 9 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2874 times:

Quoting SATL382G (Reply 2):
If you check out the type certificate it is in fact a DC-9-81, 82, 83.
It wasn't until the MD88 that they actually changed the name.

Ok, up to now I thought every MD8X's official name is always DC9-8X.

How do I have to understand this, SATL382G?

Every pre-87 (1987 being the 88's release date [?]) is a DC9-8X, while everything after that date is an MD81, MD82, MD83, MD87 or MD88.

OR

Every MD81 through 87 is officially a DC9-81 through 87, while every MD88 is just an MD88?

Thanks in advance for clearing that up.

Daniel Smile


User currently offlineToTheStars From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 264 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (9 years 9 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2832 times:

At TWA we used the term MD80 or just 80. I never considered it that "super" of a plane compared to the 1011s, 727s, and 747s that we flew. Now with all the RJs flying, the 80 almost seems like a widebody.


TWA-Airline To the Stars
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17172 posts, RR: 66
Reply 15, posted (9 years 9 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 2708 times:

Quoting Jetblue (Reply 12):

Every MD81 through 87 is officially a DC9-81 through 87, while every MD88 is just an MD88?

Thanks in advance for clearing that up.

Correct, and the MD-90 is an MD-90-30.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineSeptember11 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 3623 posts, RR: 21
Reply 16, posted (9 years 9 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 2683 times:

Apparently American Airlines is removing "Super 80" label on their Super 80's.

Left picture: With "Super 80"
Right picture: Without "Super 80"

Edit: I think they are removing black noses, as well


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tim Samples
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tim Samples



[Edited 2005-03-24 01:50:21]


Airliners.net of the Future
User currently offlineMalaysia From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 3377 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (9 years 9 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 2557 times:

I wish they made the MD-90-50, I love the MD-90 so much but this thread reminds me of referral, but my parents flew an Icelandair DC-8 once and the F/A referred it to a "707 stretch"!!! thats silly


There Are Those Who Believe That There May Yet Be Other Airlines Who Even Now Fight To Survive Beyond The Heavens
User currently offlineCaptaink From Mexico, joined May 2001, 5109 posts, RR: 12
Reply 18, posted (9 years 9 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 2543 times:

Definitely not AA alone with the Super80 term. BW didn't have it on the aircraft itself, but as i mentioned it sure was on the engine covers...


There is something special about planes....
User currently offlineBrick From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 1589 posts, RR: 7
Reply 19, posted (9 years 9 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 2489 times:

The right picture on the is an ex-TWA aircraft. I would say they aren't applying the title any longer, not that they are "removing them".

Mark



A noble spirit embiggens the smallest man...
User currently offlineNewark777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 9348 posts, RR: 29
Reply 20, posted (9 years 9 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 2448 times:

I have also noticed that American Eagle calls their ATR-72's "Super ATR's." I don't know if this is just an American Eagle thing, since I have never been on an ATR for any other airline. It's also written on the very top of the vertical stabilizers.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Alex McMahon



Harry

[Edited 2005-03-24 05:03:07]


Why grab a Heine when you can grab a Busch?
User currently offlineSeptember11 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 3623 posts, RR: 21
Reply 21, posted (9 years 9 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 2448 times:

Good observation, Mark. My question here: does all original AA M82s still have "Super 80" title?


Airliners.net of the Future
User currently offlineAsstChiefMark From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (9 years 9 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 2417 times:

I always use the term "MD80" when talking to the AA reservations people. They keep calling it a "Super 80" and I keep calling it an MD80. One time, an AA reservations woman asked me, "Why do you keep calling it by the wrong name?" I just laughed and told her that SHE was using the wrong name.

Mark


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Not Many DC9's In Europe? posted Fri May 21 2004 21:45:21 by B752fanatic
Why More Charter Airlines In Europe Than US? posted Mon Jul 10 2006 22:37:06 by BWI757
Q 400 And ATR 72 Why Not More Orders In The US? posted Sat Apr 22 2006 22:15:15 by Cumulonimbus
Why No Boeing 727's In Europe? posted Tue Aug 24 2004 14:53:18 by Rwylie77
Idea: Why Not More Space In Econ. Class? posted Mon May 5 2003 05:04:02 by GotAirbus
Why No RJ And Commuter Terminals In Europe posted Tue Sep 19 2006 12:10:05 by Konrad
Want To Change Dates In IB Flight.why Not Allowed? posted Mon Jun 26 2006 09:00:22 by Toulouse
Why So Many AS MD-80's In FAI? posted Mon Jun 19 2006 03:27:01 by FlyingNanook
Avianca Will Not Expand In Europe In Near Future? posted Mon Oct 17 2005 17:40:57 by Avianca
LX: Revenue On Long-Haul Ok, But Not In Europe posted Sun Jul 24 2005 15:07:33 by ZRH