Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Boeing 787-300 & 787-900; Available After 2010  
User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 24877 times:


Although the Boeing Co. plans at least three versions of its 787, it now appears that only the longer-range 787-8 will be coming off the assembly line in Everett before 2010.

Only two airlines, All Nippon and Japan Airlines, have publicly committed to the 787-3

While customer interest in the 787-8 has been strong, Boeing also has acknowledged that it is getting pressure from some airlines that want it to develop the stretched 787-9 sooner rather than later.

The first two years of production slots for the 787 already are filled with orders for the 787-8 model, the spokeswoman said.

Meanwhile, the 767 is nearing the end of production as a commercial jetliner. Only 21 767s remain to be delivered to customers.


http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/217151_air23.html


So it seems if you want to order the 783/8/9 now, you have to wait 5 years.

IMO 5 years is pretty long these days. Time to delivery seems to be more in the 1-2 year bracket, airlines building up for an expected economic growth period until the end of this decade.

36 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineDynkrisolo From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1866 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 24873 times:

For heaven's sake, please respect the manufacturer's own model designations. It's the -3 and -9. Why do you keep on adding the 2 0's?

User currently offlinePM From Germany, joined Feb 2005, 6941 posts, RR: 63
Reply 2, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 24802 times:

Quoting Dynkrisolo (Reply 1):
For heaven's sake, please respect the manufacturer's own model designations. It's the -3 and -9. Why do you keep on adding the 2 0's?

But it's inevitable, isn't it? If BA buy the 787-8, it'll be the 787-836, won't it? The ANA 787-3s will be 787-381s, surely. The ANZ planes will be 787-819s and so on. Whatever Boeing are trying to do with the -3, -8 and -9, they will in reality becom the -300, -800 and -900.

Though, alas, we'll never see any 787-857s...  crying 


User currently offlineAS739X From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6167 posts, RR: 24
Reply 3, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 24717 times:

Keesje...its 5 years yes, but the airlines know this going into the order. Its a more then a new airplane, its a new concept. Its going to take longer, its inevitable. Even the A380 was faster cause it was new material and stuff. It was a new design. The 787, as you, with the composites takes longer to perfect. And 5 years I dont think 5 years is really that long regarding some of these struggling carriers. At least for us Boeing lovers this will keep the 777 orders coming.

ASSFO



"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently offlineDAYflyer From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3807 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 24706 times:

Dumb move, Boeing. This will give Airbus a strategic opportunity to pry open the door for the A-350. Airlines like Etihad, Singapore and Emirates that were clamoring for the -9 are going to order the A-350 instead now. What the hell is Boeing thinking?  blockhead 


One Nation Under God
User currently offlineDynkrisolo From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1866 posts, RR: 7
Reply 5, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 24689 times:

Quoting PM (Reply 2):
But it's inevitable, isn't it? If BA buy the 787-8, it'll be the 787-836, won't it? The ANA 787-3s will be 787-381s, surely.

But you're assuming that Boeing will continue to use the customer codes. Will they? Perhaps they will, perhaps they won't. Until they do so, I think it's a good practice to use the manufacturer's own designations.


User currently offlineERJ170 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 6778 posts, RR: 17
Reply 6, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 24682 times:

Quoting DAYflyer (Reply 4):
Dumb move, Boeing. This will give Airbus a strategic opportunity to pry open the door for the A-350. Airlines like Etihad, Singapore and Emirates that were clamoring for the -9 are going to order the A-350 instead now. What the hell is Boeing thinking? blockhead

Well, let's look at it realistically...

If the first 2 years are to build the 787-8 that have already been pre-paid and building slots are filled by, why would Boeing say that they could offer the 787-9 and 787-3? If that are already booked, they are booked.. can't put an aircraft in whre there isn't room for them.. for real..

Seems like Boeing is trying to be HONEST!!! something most companies don't know or understand.



Aiming High and going far..
User currently offlinePANAM_DC10 From Australia, joined Aug 2000, 4189 posts, RR: 89
Reply 7, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 24673 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
COMMUNITY MANAGER

Quoting Keesje (Thread starter):
IMO 5 years is pretty long these days. Time to delivery seems to be more in the 1-2 year bracket, airlines building up for an expected economic growth period until the end of this decade

It's a shame that will apply to the A350 as well.

Regards



Ask the impossible to achieve the best possible
User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 24668 times:

Probably not DAYflyer, the 350 will be available after 2010 as far as I know. However 2002-2009 seem to be the golden years for the A330 with no real competition.


Quoting AS739X (Reply 3):
And 5 years I dont think 5 years is really that long regarding some of these struggling carriers

I suppose you mean the US market. Boeing nor Airbus sees this as a key market at this moment. It's happenig in Asia.

Looking at 2004/05 orders, it becomes clear many of these airlines want them now, not in 5 years.


User currently offlineDAYflyer From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3807 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 24605 times:

Quoting ERJ170 (Reply 6):
If that are already booked, they are booked.. can't put an aircraft in whre there isn't room for them.. for real..

The slots that are booked for the first two years included the 787-3 slots that ANA and JAL had already ordered. Hence, now the slots will be available since the plane will not be available until 2010.

Quoting Keesje (Reply 8):
Looking at 2004/05 orders, it becomes clear many of these airlines want them now, not in 5 years.

My point precisely. The A-330 will get immediate need orders and the A-350 will now be seen as very competitive to the 787 as the time of availability has now changed-they are now identical.

The big advantage the 787 had was it being available two full years before the A-350. Now, that advantage is gone for these two variants. That WILL impact sales of both companies; Airbus positively, and Boeing negatively.



One Nation Under God
User currently offlineNYC777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 5791 posts, RR: 47
Reply 10, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 24587 times:

The 787-9 wasn't supposed to be ready until 2012 I thought. It sounds like they did move up the time frame by two years.


That which does not kill me makes me stronger.
User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 24468 times:

Quoting DAYflyer (Reply 9):
That WILL impact sales of both companies; Airbus positively, and Boeing negatively.

Well the 787-8 is significant smaller then the proposed 350-800. So it will have a unique selling point.


User currently offlinePHXinterrupted From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 474 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 24362 times:

Quoting Keesje (Thread starter):
IMO 5 years is pretty long these days. Time to delivery seems to be more in the 1-2 year bracket, airlines building up for an expected economic growth period until the end of this decade.

That's not very long for a brand new plane.

You know Keesje, if you ever said anything positive about Boeing, you might give some of us a stroke!



Keepin' it real.
User currently offlineDAYflyer From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3807 posts, RR: 3
Reply 13, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 24244 times:

Quoting Keesje (Reply 11):
Well the 787-8 is significant smaller then the proposed 350-800. So it will have a unique selling point.

What are the A-350 specs? Do you have a link or other info on it?



One Nation Under God
User currently offlineRJ111 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 24215 times:

DayFlyer, i sent you them about a month ago. Don't you trust me?

[Edited 2005-03-23 17:58:31]

User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4454 posts, RR: 5
Reply 15, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 24153 times:

So, the first 2 years of production are sold out and this is a bad thing? This program is a success so far and seems to be on the right track regardless of a delay or two. I don't see airlines flocking to buy A330s and A350s that will be regarded as old technology as soon as the 787-3/8/9 enter the revenue earning world.


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineAtmx2000 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 4576 posts, RR: 37
Reply 16, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 23967 times:

Quoting DAYflyer (Reply 4):
What the hell is Boeing thinking?

Apparently they are thinking that they can get additional data from the 787-8 flight testing and EIS and apply that to the 787-9. The 787-9 faces more direct competition in terms of range and capacity, and could benefit from refinements from actual real world experience and performance data.



ConcordeBoy is a twin supremacist!! He supports quadicide!!
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 989 posts, RR: 51
Reply 17, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 23787 times:

Quoting PM (Reply 2):
But it's inevitable, isn't it? If BA buy the 787-8, it'll be the 787-836, won't it?

No, there is a good probability that "customer codes" will go the wayside. The 787 is designed with few options, and nearly all options are reversable (including the engines!). A 787-8 could swap hands from United to American Airlines with no compromise in configuration.

Quoting Keesje (Thread starter):
IMO 5 years is pretty long these days. Time to delivery seems to be more in the 1-2 year bracket, airlines building up for an expected economic growth period until the end of this decade.

Keesje: as the LOT order shows perfectly airlines are no longer accepting bids for the A332. LOT rejected the A332 and requested a bid for the 787 and A350 only. Any airline looking at long-term fleet planning will simply not consider the A330, end of story.

At this point, the A330-200/300 will (at best) gain add-on orders from existing customers. Maybe one or two new (minor) customers, but long-term strategic customers are no-where to be found.

Quoting DAYflyer (Reply 9):

The big advantage the 787 had was it being available two full years before the A-350. Now, that advantage is gone for these two variants

Those two years are sold-out, so for any customers looking to buy today... there is no advantage for either OEM


User currently offlineScottB From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 6797 posts, RR: 32
Reply 18, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 23760 times:

Quoting Keesje (Reply 8):
However 2002-2009 seem to be the golden years for the A330 with no real competition.

Really? How many orders have been placed for the A330 since Airbus announced the launch of the A350? How do A330 orders/commitments since 1/1/2004 compare to 787 orders/commitments? How many airlines are going to be eager to order airframes that will lose a significant percentage of their resale value once the A350 begins flying?

And if you want the A350 in 2010, you will have the choice of GE engines or GE engines.

I guess I don't get the negative spin here.* Demand for the 787 has been good enough that Boeing has filled the production slots for the first two years while only needing to offer one model. Wow, how terrible for Boeing!!!

* (Actually, I do, since this topic was started by Keesje. If Boeing announced orders that filled the 787 production slots for 2010 through 2012, he'd spin it as being bad for Boeing because airlines would have no choice but to order the A350.)


User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 989 posts, RR: 51
Reply 19, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 23755 times:

Quoting ScottB (Reply 18):
And if you want the A350 in 2010, you will have the choice of GE engines or GE engines.

Rolls Royce will be onboard before long. I question whether they will go with Pratt or not... everyone and their brother has been screwed by the commercial division at some point.


User currently offlineN60659 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 654 posts, RR: 24
Reply 20, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 23722 times:

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 17):
the LOT order shows perfectly airlines are no longer accepting bids for the A332. LOT rejected the A332 and requested a bid for the 787 and A350 only.

This may be slightly off-topic, but DfwRevolution's statement reminded me that earlier this year AI had expressed an interest in the A330-200 for it's fleet renewal:

http://www.airindia.com/article.asp?articleid=259.

Is this still valid or have they expressed a desire to acquire the A350? Any clarification would be most appreciated.



Nec Dextrorsum Nec Sinistrorsum
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 989 posts, RR: 51
Reply 21, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 23718 times:

Quoting N60659 (Reply 20):
This may be slightly off-topic, but DfwRevolution's statement reminded me that earlier this year AI had expressed an interest in the A330-200 for it's fleet renewal:

The A350 was included as well


User currently offlinePANAM_DC10 From Australia, joined Aug 2000, 4189 posts, RR: 89
Reply 22, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 23667 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
COMMUNITY MANAGER

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 17):
Keesje: as the LOT order shows perfectly airlines are no longer accepting bids for the A332. LOT rejected the A332 and requested a bid for the 787 and A350 only. Any airline looking at long-term fleet planning will simply not consider the A330, end of story.

At this point, the A330-200/300 will (at best) gain add-on orders from existing customers. Maybe one or two new (minor) customers, but long-term strategic customers are no-where to be found.

That is a valid point though I believe the A330 will still have slightly better prospects for a few years to come. I think what Keesje was trying to point to was Air China and China Eastern's recent large A330 orders which are a good example of where demand needs to be met with deliveries from 2006 onwards. I feel that though we'll see more RFPs similar to LOTs which exclude the A330 we will continue to see some substantial A330 orders yet, including add on orders you refer to.

Just my $.02

Regards



Ask the impossible to achieve the best possible
User currently offlineQFA001 From Australia, joined May 2000, 673 posts, RR: 53
Reply 23, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 23597 times:

Quoting DAYflyer (Reply 9):
The slots that are booked for the first two years included the 787-3 slots that ANA and JAL had already ordered. Hence, now the slots will be available since the plane will not be available until 2010.

That is not correct. From the outset NH specified that it would take -3s from 2010 onwards. Boeing was going to fill the 2008-09 slots with -3s or -8s. As it turned out, they were able to do it with -8s.

Quote:
The big advantage the 787 had was it being available two full years before the A-350. Now, that advantage is gone for these two variants. That WILL impact sales of both companies; Airbus positively, and Boeing negatively.

Rubbish. For starters, the B787-3 market is limited and Airbus hasn't bothered competing with it. Second, both the A350-900 and B787-9 are fluid products. As of right now they are intended to enter service at around the same time.

Quoting Keesje (Reply 11):
Well the 787-8 is significant smaller then the proposed 350-800. So it will have a unique selling point.

Not much of one. The B788 is about the same size compared to the A358 as the A333/343 is to the B772. Both B788 and A358 will be entertained by the same market.

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 17):
...as the LOT order shows perfectly airlines are no longer accepting bids for the A332. LOT rejected the A332 and requested a bid for the 787 and A350 only. Any airline looking at long-term fleet planning will simply not consider the A330, end of story.

I don't believe that LO has ruled out the A332 as an interim option. One of Airbus' key advantages is being able to offer A330s as an interim for A350s, as they did with the UX A350 commitment.

Quoting ScottB (Reply 18):
How many orders have been placed for the A330 since Airbus announced the launch of the A350?

In the first two months of 2005, Airbus sold four -200s and six -300s. If anything, the A350 shows customers that the A330 is not a dead-end. There will be more sales, particularly China (and India?) during 2005.

Quote:
How many airlines are going to be eager to order airframes that will lose a significant percentage of their resale value once the A350 begins flying?

It won't be a large population of airlines but there will be some.


User currently offlineDAYflyer From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3807 posts, RR: 3
Reply 24, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 22933 times:

Quoting QFA001 (Reply 23):
That is not correct. From the outset NH specified that it would take -3s from 2010 onwards. Boeing was going to fill the 2008-09 slots with -3s or -8s. As it turned out, they were able to do it with -8s.

Thanks for the clarification. My understanding was the ANA order included -3 varients for delivery during 2008-9.



One Nation Under God
25 TradewindL1011 : Well, let's not jump to conclusions here. There are still many different configurations that the 787 could have, to name just a few the entire cabin
26 Amy : I don't think Boeing would change the way their aircraft are designated. The 787 was the 7E7 but that didn't mean it would end up that way. I would e
27 DfwRevolution : It really wouldn't suprise me either, but no doubt, the "customer code" will carry less importance/meaning with the 787 I'm not. I'm basing my opinio
28 Keesje : Boeing is promoting standardization as long as we know them. It is also a trap for them. Ask airlines; "inflexible", "they tell us what we want", "in
29 DfwRevolution : Sure Keesje... so what was that "Working Together" group formed for the 777? :-/ You're describing their former sales team, not their RD department a
30 Ken777 : If there is heavy pressure from the airlines for deliveries what would keep Boeing from increasing their production rate? Supplier are critical, but t
31 Gigneil : Its arguable that the 737NG isn't the "market preferred". N
32 Keesje : So e.g. why do we think was the overhead crew rest introduced 8 years after the types introduction? Creating a group & listening to airlines is one t
33 DeltaWings : Really? I thought The A350-800 competitor was the 789, while the 772 will be in the same market as the A350-900. The B788 will replace the 763. We kn
34 Post contains images DfwRevolution : Why did Boeing even offer the 773A? The specific request of airlines like CX. To say Boeing has been blindly disregarding all opinons of their paying
35 Keesje : Nobody is saying that, however I know Boeing & as you told us: so this seems to confirm not much is changing in this respect
36 FriendlySkies : You are misreading it...the 787 will include many more STANDARD features. It's like buying a car. Unlike previous models, the 787 will include more r
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Boeing 787 Line Numbers - After L/N 49? posted Fri Jul 16 2010 10:57:27 by virginblue4
LOT Gives Boeing Ultimatum About 787 Compensation posted Thu Sep 26 2013 03:36:33 by Gonzalo
Boeing Launches The 787-10 Dreamliner posted Tue Jun 18 2013 02:07:14 by moderators
ANA Wants Boeing Compensation For 787 In Ca$h posted Wed Mar 20 2013 09:21:56 by Gonzalo
Should Boeing Compensate The 787 Customers? posted Fri Feb 1 2013 19:26:58 by Gonzalo
AI Gets Boeing Loan For (1) 787 posted Thu Oct 4 2012 08:46:17 by rotating14
When Will Boeing Know If 787 Design Details Worked posted Sun Jul 22 2012 08:14:19 by 2175301
ANA Wants Boeing To Make 787 Windows Darker posted Wed Jun 20 2012 02:46:25 by sankaps
Delamination Prompts Boeing To Inspect 787 Fleet posted Sat Feb 4 2012 19:03:00 by RNOcommctr
Boeing To Deliver 787 To ANA Sept 26th posted Fri Aug 26 2011 09:31:33 by DFWHeavy