Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A350 Weight  
User currently offlineTrex8 From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 4769 posts, RR: 14
Posted (9 years 6 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1473 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

In Flight Intl a month or two back they had an article about the A350 and IIRC they said that with the use of composites etc etc in the airframe they would reduce the A350s weight by x compared to the a330. But because of something to do with the new generation engines being heavier or needing a heavier pylon, actual weight reduction would be less than x by a certain amount (IIRC it was maybe 1 or 2 metric tons per plane).

In AWST this week, they have a whole article (well, actually more like an advert) on the 787 suppliers and the GenX engine etc is supposed to save 350kg in weight vs a similar engine without composite casing, blades etc.

So whats with the A350 engines or the pylon (supposedly the same basic engine as the 787s but with bleed air) being heavy. Is it all related to the associated bleed air systems?? Or is there something else I am missing or misunderstood?


(Interestingly, if I read the AWST article correctly, the 20% fuel savings that the 787 will have over present planes (presumably the 767) is something like 13% from composite airframe structure, 3% from bleedless systems, 3% from improved aerodynamics.)

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineQFA001 From Australia, joined May 2000, 673 posts, RR: 53
Reply 1, posted (9 years 6 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1435 times:

Quoting Trex8 (Thread starter):
So whats with the A350 engines or the pylon (supposedly the same basic engine as the 787s but with bleed air) being heavy. Is it all related to the associated bleed air systems?? Or is there something else I am missing or misunderstood?

The GEnx and T1000 engines are much heavier than the engines currently used by the A330, such as the CF6-80 and T700. In addition to this extra weight, relative to the A330, Airbus needs to beef the pylon, main spar and flaps to accommodate those heavier engines.

Here is an Orders post on this subject that might help.


User currently offlineRJ111 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 6 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1408 times:

I've read somewhere on this site they're looking at the A358 and A359 to weigh 119.2t and 122.3t respectively.

The A332 and A333 weigh 122t and 124t IIRC off the top of my head.


User currently offlineTrex8 From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 4769 posts, RR: 14
Reply 3, posted (9 years 6 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1376 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

aren't the new engines of similar thrust to the CF6-80E and Trent 700s??? Why are they that much heavier??

User currently offlineQFA001 From Australia, joined May 2000, 673 posts, RR: 53
Reply 4, posted (9 years 6 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1318 times:

Quoting Trex8 (Reply 3):
aren't the new engines of similar thrust to the CF6-80E and Trent 700s??? Why are they that much heavier??

They have larger, wider chord fans. That also drives the size and weight of the shroud. The off-set, of course, is reduced specific fuel consumption (SFC) and better noise characteristics due to higher bypass-ratio (BPR).


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
A350 Weight posted Thu Mar 24 2005 01:14:40 by Trex8
744 Replacement - How Will The A350-10 Do? posted Fri May 30 2008 04:14:08 by CHRISBA777ER
Airbus Asking For State Aid For A350 posted Tue May 27 2008 17:27:46 by NAV20
First Test-section Of A350 Pictured... posted Fri May 23 2008 05:50:50 by Beaucaire
Air France To Decide In 2009 Between A350 Or 787 posted Thu May 22 2008 06:37:55 by Beaucaire
Why Didnt A Make The A350 Wider Than The 777? posted Wed May 21 2008 06:40:03 by Virgin747lgw
German Newspaper: A350 Overweight posted Wed May 21 2008 01:48:42 by N1786b
10-abreast A350 XWB -Airbus Proposal posted Mon May 19 2008 05:29:01 by Aviationbuff
Spirit Aerospace To Participate In A350... posted Wed May 14 2008 04:43:52 by Beaucaire
787/A350 Engine Progress? posted Mon May 12 2008 11:16:32 by Cloudy