Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AV & LA Incident At BOG  
User currently offlineKomododx From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3104 times:

AV and LA a/c touched each other's wings on entering the active rwy for takeoff. Some delays happened and the passengers had to be taken back to the terminal by bus. No word yet if the a/c's can still fly or might need repairs.

Click here for the article (Spanish only).

Can any of the Colombians provide more details or some pics?

Stefano

34 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineA388 From Netherlands Antilles, joined May 2001, 9769 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3076 times:

Thanks for the article Komododx,

However, I don't understand how two aircraft can "collide" or touch each other's wingtips while entering an active runway. Don't these aircraft taxi behind each other during such a procedure? Even when turning I still don't quite understand it as the aircraft are lined up behind each other, therefor it would be impossible that the wintips touch each other. There's quite a lot of room between a runway and a taxiway, right?

Anyway, I'm interested in knowing what exactly happened. Gracias para la informacion amigo  Smile

A388


User currently offlineTACAA320 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3066 times:

Thanks for the article. Nevertheless, as A388 said, it's not very clear about how do they collided. Thanks God there are no casualties at all.

User currently offlineBogota From Colombia, joined Sep 2004, 819 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3059 times:

I would tend to think that as the end of the taxiways in Bogota as you enter any of the two runways, their is a wider holding area where two aircraft can stop parallel to each other so to optimize the use of the runways. I would assume that is where the incident happened, clearly one aircraft must have been at the holding point first as the other arrived there was a miscalculation, either the first one was too far back at the holding point, or the second one turned sooner that he should into his holding point.

User currently offlineA388 From Netherlands Antilles, joined May 2001, 9769 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3045 times:

That clears it up a bit more, thanks Bogota. Waiting on more details and hopefully there are some photos of this incident as well  Smile

A388


User currently offlineKomododx From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 3033 times:

Quoting Bogota (Reply 3):
I would tend to think that as the end of the taxiways in Bogota as you enter any of the two runways, their is a wider holding area where two aircraft can stop parallel to each other so to optimize the use of the runways. I would assume that is where the incident happened, clearly one aircraft must have been at the holding point first as the other arrived there was a miscalculation, either the first one was too far back at the holding point, or the second one turned sooner that he should into his holding point.

That's what I thought. I know at MIA and FLL they have this wide area, sometimes I also see a/c "jumping" the line for t/o and I assume this is also done if someone is behind schedule. I do not recall seeing this in BOG thought. Check these two pics out (Assuming 13L/R were used, as 31L/R are rarely active):

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=356


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ray Harvey



Stefano

[Edited 2005-03-28 00:34:35]

User currently offlineRCS763AV From Colombia, joined Jun 2004, 4394 posts, RR: 12
Reply 6, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 3012 times:

What planes were those??? I assume it was an AV 767-200ER as it was going to MIA and the LA plane an A320 or 7663?????


Les escribo desde el frío de mi verde altiplano.
User currently offlinePPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 8957 posts, RR: 40
Reply 7, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 3002 times:

Quoting RCS763AV (Reply 6):
What planes were those??? I assume it was an AV 767-200ER as it was going to MIA and the LA plane an A320 or 7663?????

The article says both are boeings.

Really strange incident, but it sounds to me it's just a mistake on the part of the media and both planes were probably backing out of the gates or something like that...



"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
User currently offlineBogota From Colombia, joined Sep 2004, 819 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 2981 times:

I am not sure about 13R, but for sure 13L has it as I remember being at that holding point with a plane on my side.

User currently offlineJUANR From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2968 times:

I just saw the images at Caracol Noticias, there is no mistake in the media, the incident happened at the holding point of runway 13L (runway 13R is closed due to maintenance) when both airplanes were side by side, as written before, on the wide area used to optimized departures. This area is really wide and certainly can handle two large boeings side by side so one of the pilots is to blame; which one? It is hard to say news are not that clear and the images do not let us see the yellow lines. Both Lan and Avianca pilots are very professional.

On the other side, a WCA Let-410 crashed Saturday morning at Providencia Island, the plane was on scheduled flight from Providencia to San Andres Island and 8 people died. Later on the day an emergency was declared on an MD-81 flying from ADZ-MDE-BOG route before landing at MDE where the oxygen masks fell and had to be used by the passengers. No explanation was given by the very rude crew and captain and those passengers flying to BOG demanded a new plane for the MDE-BOG leg; the incident took place at 4:00pm and the passengers finally arrived to BOG at midnight.

These are bad news for WCA which image certainly is going down, before these two incidents El Espectador newspaper had published an article about Colombian Air Safety where they said that inspectors from Aeronautica Civil Colombiana found that the airline broke 14 rules of the Aeronautical Code, including lack of crew-training, lack of maintenance of planes, exceeding the flight times, etc, etc, etc, That is not an airline I would fly at all.

Source: http://www.elespectador.com/periodismo_inv/2005/marzo/nota3.htm

Juan
SKBO


User currently offlineKomododx From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2920 times:

Quoting JUANR (Reply 9):
These are bad news for WCA which image certainly is going down, before these two incidents El Espectador newspaper had published an article about Colombian Air Safety where they said that inspectors from Aeronautica Civil Colombiana found that the airline broke 14 rules of the Aeronautical Code, including lack of crew-training, lack of maintenance of planes, exceeding the flight times, etc, etc, etc, That is not an airline I would fly at all.

Wow! I did read about the crash on the San Andres-Providencia route. This is really bad, especially breaking the AeroCivil routes. I had only heard good things about West... too bad!

Stefano


User currently offlineKomododx From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 2917 times:

Here is the pic from El Tiempo



Stefano


User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12134 posts, RR: 51
Reply 12, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 2894 times:

There is leading edge damage to the B-767 on the right, and trailing edge damage for the one on the left. Looks like the guy on the right caused the incident. B-767s are not known for the ability to back up (unless they are rolling down an incline).

Fortunately the damage looks worse than it actually is.


User currently offlineKomododx From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2857 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 12):
Looks like the guy on the right caused the incident.

Yup. According to the extended article on El Tiempo it was AV's pilot's fault.

Stefano


User currently offline757MDE From Colombia, joined Sep 2004, 1753 posts, RR: 6
Reply 14, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 2823 times:

That El Espectador article has errors, as usual with journalists trying to write about Aviation.
The West accident is not a good thing, but I'd still fly the Airline.
Incidents happen lots of times, the one of the masks is just another one, I mean, if it was for that I wouldn't fly AV P5 AA or any Airline, I don't there's one that hasn't had their attention called by the Aviation Authority of their country..it doesn't necessarily mean that it's unsafe...

As for the current investigations, I'll wait.



I gladly accept donations to pay for flight hours! This thing draws man...
User currently offlineRCS763AV From Colombia, joined Jun 2004, 4394 posts, RR: 12
Reply 15, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 2758 times:

Hey the LA plane was pretty empty huh....


Les escribo desde el frío de mi verde altiplano.
User currently offlineOB1504 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 3327 posts, RR: 9
Reply 16, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 2678 times:

Am I right in guessing that the LAN aircraft involved in the incident is CC-CEB? The letters on the nose gear door look like "CE" and then a letter that I can't read. It can't be CC-CEN because she still has "LAN Chile" titles and this aircraft only has "LAN" titles. Interestingly, CC-CEB has a Peruvian flag over the registration.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Fabio Laranjeira



User currently offlineKomododx From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 2650 times:



Stefano


User currently offlineJUANR From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 2643 times:

it looks like it was the AV's pilot foult, Take a look at El Tiempo Web PAge where you can find the audio file in which the AV pilot tell the people on board what is going on and apologizes for the situation he has created for the passengers.

Juan
SKBO


User currently offline757MDE From Colombia, joined Sep 2004, 1753 posts, RR: 6
Reply 19, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 2618 times:

Quoting OB1504 (Reply 16):
Interestingly, CC-CEB has a Peruvian flag over the registration.

Must be one of LAN's known ways for overriding certain rules...



I gladly accept donations to pay for flight hours! This thing draws man...
User currently offlineDanimarroquin From Colombia, joined Jan 2005, 449 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 2580 times:

The AV plane , which 767 was it?

User currently offlineGhost77 From Mexico, joined Mar 2000, 5217 posts, RR: 51
Reply 21, posted (9 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2500 times:

Does anybody know the registrations?

Ricardo APM



Ricardo Morales - flyAPM - ¡No es que maneje rapido, solo estoy volando lento!
User currently offlineRJ_Delta From Chile, joined Oct 2000, 1944 posts, RR: 12
Reply 22, posted (9 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2486 times:

LAN's 767-300ER affected is the CC-CEB painted with old color scheme using only the word Lan. The 763 will return to Santiago today, and the passenger will continuing its flight to Lima and Santiago in a A320 CC-COC (special charter), that the company send to Colombia to carry all the passengers.

User currently offlineAV757 From Colombia, joined Apr 2004, 660 posts, RR: 6
Reply 23, posted (9 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 2436 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The airplanes involved in the collision yesterday are:

LAN registry CC-CEB, Boeing 767-316ER, c/n 26327, l/n 621.

AV registry N985AN, Boeing 767-259ER, c/n 24618, l/n 292.

Both airplanes are grounded and out of service for now until a painstaking and time consuming inspection procedure of the wings off both aircraft are completed to asses the damage that may have occurred to the structure and to give a verdict on the repair needed to allow both planes to fly safely again.

The LAN airplane is parked at the international remote ramp, and the AV is in hangar 1 at AV maintenance with the left wing damaged areas removed and dismantled for inspection and damage evaluation. So far it seems that N985AN will be out of service for approximately one month while repairs are executed.

Investigation of the incident is in process by the Colombian Aeronautical Authorities and by both AV and LAN Flight Safety Divisions. It is not clear yet how both airplanes collided at the marked narrow holding point of RWY 13L.

It seems that the recently painted yellow taxi lines do not comply with the minimum specific wing clearance distance of two wide body airplanes side by side at the holding bay, as in RWY 31R holding bay; where the limitation exists and is published on the airport charts.

The LAN airplane was parked on the left side of the holding bay waiting for take-off clearance, while AV was cleared to taxi from behind and on the right side of the holding bay into RWY 13L for take-off when the incident occurred.

I will pass on the official results when an official verdict is published after the investigation.

Regards:
AV757


User currently offlineOB1504 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 3327 posts, RR: 9
Reply 24, posted (9 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 2411 times:

Does anyone know when CC-CEB will be back in service or how LAN flights with B763 equipment will be affected? I'm taking flight LP 0510 LIM-MIA tomorrow morning, and I wanted to know if there was any chance of the flight being delayed, cancelled, or at best, upgraded to A343 equipment. Big grin

25 Bongo : Thanks AV757, as always, your info is very valuable. AV will take "advantage" of the situation to repaint the a/c with the new livery ?
26 Komododx : This is the first thing that popped to mind when I read what AV757 posted. What will the use to replace this 762 for a whole month? What's the status
27 TACAA320 : Hopefully there was no casualties to regret. Nevertheless the AV pilot apparently has many reasons to be worry about.[Edited 2005-03-29 06:07:23]
28 Adriaticus : I saw CC-CEB parked out there from BOG's gate 6 of the international concourse, earlier today. I was able to snap a couple of pictures before someone
29 AV757 : The control tower issues instructions and clearances for taxi, pushback, take-off and many other details during airplane ground operations. But the so
30 MATURRO727 : Hey. Thanks again AV757 regards MATURRO727
31 Post contains links Bongo : According to this week's Semana ( www.semana.com.co ) the cost of fixing AV's wing is around USD$ 1 million. Why is that expensive? If it was just a t
32 Summa767 : Bongo, what section of Semana is this info in? Do you have a direct link? How long do they say the airplane will be out of service? I wonder if such a
33 Bongo : Summa767: Saw it on the printed version of Semana Magazine... in a page where they show figures and other stuff, title: " La Cifra".
34 Summa767 : That's a section that is not on the online version. Well, I hope that plane is flyng very soon, as lots of new flights seem to be on the cards!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AV´s Incident On BOG-EZE (last Night) posted Mon Oct 30 2006 03:39:12 by Bongo
Why No SQ, CX & TG Service At IAD? posted Tue Nov 21 2006 14:59:37 by Mk777
Thomas Cook A320 Incident At MAN Today posted Thu Nov 16 2006 20:09:03 by HARLEYF150
UA 757 Incident At EWR Yesterday (Nov 2)? posted Fri Nov 3 2006 14:44:14 by 22right
Yet Another AI Incident (at Muscat) posted Mon Oct 16 2006 21:51:48 by Deaphen
DL Landing Incident At Denver Int'l Airport posted Thu Oct 12 2006 02:50:17 by Brick
C-172 Incident At Naples While Landing posted Sat Sep 23 2006 01:46:41 by Dj1986
Aircraft Incident At LAS... posted Thu Sep 21 2006 04:52:09 by OPNLguy
Air NZ Q300 Incident At PMR posted Thu Sep 7 2006 07:46:36 by NZ747
MH Quarterly Result Saw Zurich, Rome & LA To Stay posted Thu Aug 31 2006 07:56:46 by 9MMAR