Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
VS At T3 To Be Better Than T5?  
User currently offlineIntheKnow From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 4368 times:

Quoted from a VS press release:

"Virgin Atlantic Airways today agreed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the BAA on a programme to renew and expand the airline’s facilities at Heathrow’s Terminal 3. The new works will be designed by Foster and Partners and will be completed in phases between 2007 – 2012. They will enable Virgin Atlantic to significantly increase the number of passengers it handles at Heathrow from 3 million to 5.5 million per year.

The project will provide both speed and intimacy for Virgin Atlantic’s passengers as they check in, move through security, relax in the lounge, get called to the gate and board the aircraft. The first phase of work will be complete before Terminal 5 opens and will be ready for the arrival of Virgin Atlantic’s Airbus A380’s in 2008.

There are both London Underground and Heathrow Express stations at Terminal 3 and Upper Class passengers will be welcomed at a new dedicated Drive Thru area. The new Virgin Atlantic facilities will be so compact that passengers will only have to walk as little as 200 metres from check in to the gate.

Speaking at Heathrow Airport before Virgin Atlantic’s inaugural flight to Mumbai, Richard Branson, Chairman of Virgin Atlantic, welcomed the agreement:

“We’re delighted to have secured this innovative deal with the BAA which will allow us to double in size at Heathrow yet create a more intimate experience for our passengers. Our passengers tell us that in their ‘cash rich, time poor’ lives they are increasingly frustrated at the time spent queuing at the airport, so we’ve made sure this work will cut down the time it takes passengers from arrival to the gate. In fact, whether you arrive at Heathrow from London by road or public transport you will get to the airport quicker and get through the airport quicker at Terminal 3 than Terminal 5.

“We’re also delighted to be working with Foster and Partners who have a world class reputation for airport design built on wonderful looking airports like Hong Kong and Stansted.

“We’re taking the opposite approach to our competitors by being ‘big in the air and small on the ground’. Growing passenger demand on the key routes we fly has led us to operate larger planes than our rivals like Boeing 747’s and Airbus A340-600’s, while ordering the new super jumbo Airbus A380’s. Our passengers love our in flight service on these aircraft, yet at the airport we believe they prefer a more intimate experience. With these new developments we will minimise queuing time, speed passengers’ journey through the airport and bring all our facilities together in a more compact area than any other major airline at Heathrow!

“When talking about terminals for once I’m happy to say to BA that ours is smaller than yours!”

Mick Temple, BAA Heathrow Managing Director, said:

“We are delighted to be signing this MOU. It has been reached through constructive dialogue which has been driven by the desire to jointly develop creative solutions. It has been a real team effort and the outcome is a commitment to re-develop part of Terminal 3 for Virgin and provide a great alternative to Terminal 5.

“The redevelopment also compliments our long term plans for the rest of Terminal 3 and will deliver an enhanced passenger experience for all terminal users.”

The MOU was signed by Steve Ridgway, Chief Executive of Virgin Atlantic Airways and Mike Clasper, Chief Executive of BAA and both companies are now working on a project plan to deliver the new facilities. The new work will complement the £100m works already started by BAA around Pier 6 at Terminal 3 to accommodate the new Airbus A380’s.

Virgin Atlantic currently operates 117 flights a week from Heathrow to a range of destinations worldwide including New York (both JFK and Newark), Boston, Cape Town, Delhi, Hong Kong, Johannesburg, Lagos, Los Angeles, Miami, Mumbai, San Francisco, Shanghai, Sydney, Tokyo and Washington.


For further information, please contact the Virgin Atlantic Press Office on 01293 747373 or try the Virgin Atlantic website www.virgin.com/atlantic"

Sounds interesting, great for VS as we could'nt get into T5.

Cheers

ITK

22 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSpeedbird2155 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 871 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 4322 times:

Well Brabson had to try something. The number of flights VS operates from LHR per week is less than what BA operates from T4 per day, so it is a given that VS would need less space. This is simply another gimmick by Branson to attempt to overshadow BA and the move to T5. It will be interesting to see just how they redesign T3 so that it is less than "200 metres from check in to the gate". The BAA had to give him something after constantly rejecting his moves for T4, including the rediculous idea that VS be allowed to use the Victor Pier (Gates 22-25) at night and bus passengers over from T3, based on the rationale that BA wasn't utilising that area effectively.

The fact is T5 is necessarily large so as to accommodate all of BA's LHR operations (approx. 300 departures daily) and provide passengers with greater comfort and easier connections.


User currently offlineFLVILLA From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2004, 394 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 4316 times:

T5 would still be better for connecting passengers over all who are on BA. I think with all the money being spent on T5 it will be a good terminal.


I hope in life i can work to live, not live to work
User currently offlineBCAL From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2004, 3384 posts, RR: 16
Reply 3, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 4298 times:

My thoughts exactly Speedbird2155. Branson is just like a kid in a playground - always trying to overshadow everyone. Out of curiosity, as you might have the information readily available, how many flights does VS currently operate from LHR per week?

Do the majority of Upper Class passengers arrive at LHR by London Underground?



MOL on SRB's latest attack at BA: "It's like a little Chihuahua barking at a dying Labrador. Nobody cares."
User currently offlineRichard28 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2003, 1602 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 4259 times:

Quoting BCAL (Reply 3):
Do the majority of Upper Class passengers arrive at LHR by London Underground

No, most go by the free Limo service!


Dont get the criticism here. T3 has had a lot of overhaul after imigration recently, including the new VS clubhouse due to open later this year.

With the orders of A340-600's and A380's coming to VS over the next few years its a given that they need more check in room, and it's nice to see they're going to get it, and it will also be done by a top designer.

Probably wont be as good as T5, but then that's a clean sheet design.


User currently offlineIntheKnow From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 4259 times:

BCAL.

Quoting BCAL (Reply 3):
how many flights does VS currently operate from LHR per week?

How can you comment on this thread if you didn't bother to read it? In my first post it mentions how many VS flights leave LHR a week.

Branson trying to overshadow everyone is business, people who dont like this sort of thing maybe have something to worry about with such competition?

ITK


User currently offlineFlyCaledonian From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2066 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4220 times:

So is this a refurbishment of part of T3, or is the plan to demolish part of T3 and rebuild it, linking it in to Pier 6?

With VS in T3, Star in T1, what are the plans for SkyTeam and remianing non-aligned longhaul carriers? SkyTeam to T4 and non-aligned longhaul in T3? Or, has been suggested on here, OneWorld (excluding BA/QF), i.e. AA, AY, CX and IB to T4, with SkyTeam also in T4 or a rebuilt T2.



Let's Go British Caledonian!
User currently offlinePA110 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 1989 posts, RR: 24
Reply 7, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 4141 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Anything to improve T3 has to be a welcome event!!!! T3 is currently a horrible facility for all who use it. Perhaps VS is going to take over and enlarge the area by gates 8-10 which are closest to the VS checkin facilities.


It's been swell, but the swelling has gone down.
User currently offlineAerofan From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 1517 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4086 times:

Do you people just criticize SRB at every turn or something? Nothing else to do? So the man can be something of a jack ass, but so what? He is creating publicity for his airline and getting it done for free at that. For pete's sake what is wrong wid dat? what do u want to happen to have the good ole days when BA was the only carrier?

User currently offlineIowa744Fan From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 931 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 4053 times:

Is it pretty much a given that Star is going to take over T1? Which is bigger, T1 or T4? Does T1 even have that many longhaul gates? I realize that they would need plenty of smaller gates for the European members who aren't going to fly widebodies in there, but I figure that they also need plenty of widebody gates for the other members. Also, will the 380s for SQ fit in any gates in T1? I have heard that the Europier could be modified, but not much else. Also, if both Oneworld and Skyteam went to T4, would they likely change the existing setup by taking out some widebody gates and making more gates with smaller gateboxes for the narrowbody aircraft that will be operated by the European Oneworld and Skyteam members? Any info would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

User currently offlineSpeedbird2155 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 871 posts, RR: 5
Reply 10, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 4005 times:

Aerofan, all that people here have done is simply point out that Branson is up to his usual gimmicks, but if that is being critical, then I guess you'd prefer that nothing is ever mentioned about him and VS unless it is highly commendable? The fact is Branson still has to compare himself and VS to BA on every level and whenever BA does something, he always seeks a way to overshadow BA. As a BA staff member, I find it quite comical, but highly flattering as it shows that we must be doing something right.

Quoting Iowa744Fan (Reply 9):
Which is bigger, T1 or T4? Does T1 even have that many longhaul gates?

T1 is bigger and already serves a number of longhaul flights daily, including BA to NRT, SFO, LAX and others, along with SA and LY. Also given that BD is based in T1 and is the second largest operator out of LHR, it is easier to move the other Star carriers to T1, which already handles the large BD ops.

There will be no Oneworld carriers in T4 after the reorganisation.


User currently offlineBCAL From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2004, 3384 posts, RR: 16
Reply 11, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 3964 times:

Quoting IntheKnow (Reply 5):
How can you comment on this thread if you didn't bother to read it? In my first post it mentions how many VS flights leave LHR a week.

My sincere apologies. I missed it on my first read as somehow the 3 million passengers distracted my full attention.  embarrassed 

So BA operates 300 flights daily from LHR and VS operates 117 a week. On this basis VS needs less than 6% of the space allocated to BA.



MOL on SRB's latest attack at BA: "It's like a little Chihuahua barking at a dying Labrador. Nobody cares."
User currently offlineIntheKnow From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 3891 times:

BCAL

Apology accepted, have a lovely day.

ITK


User currently offlineSQNo1 From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 687 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 3862 times:

Quoting IntheKnow (Thread starter):
The new works will be designed by Foster and Partners and will be completed in phases between 2007 – 2012.

This would be the foster that messed up the millenium (wobbly) bridge in 2000, am I correct!

With Regards,
SQno1


User currently offlineVs25 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2004, 66 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 3741 times:

Any upgrades to T3 are more than welcome. This week I had the pleasure of using the new arrivals floor from one of the 20s gates. Nice!

I don't see how you could ever have only 200m from check in to gate. Vs have it pretty sweet at the moment. Off the tube/express/bus/car, check in, up the escalator and there's security. However most VS flights tend to depart from the 34s (at least 90% of the flights I've ever been on). Anyone who has ever walked the 0.5mile to those gates will know what a hike it is. Although the gate 34 area is the nicest in T3. I believe these are the only gates that can handle the 346s (the longest jetways I ever walked down).

I've often wondered why VS didn't get the new clubhouse built above these new gates. Sure its a hike to get there, but then there would be zero walk to the plane.

By the way, does anyone know what is happening to the current clubhouse? I've heard its being refitted and made larger in the next month or so.


User currently offlineRichard28 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2003, 1602 posts, RR: 6
Reply 15, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 3729 times:

Quoting Vs25 (Reply 14):
By the way, does anyone know what is happening to the current clubhouse? I've heard its being refitted and made larger in the next month or so.

The new clubhouse will open in the next few months, and is being built as we speak next door to the current one (in the old Air Canada Lounge I understand).

After the new one opens, the existing one will also be renovated, and then the made into one double sized clubhouse from December.

there's a few threads with more info over on v-flyer on this, and some info on the VS website.

Rich.


User currently offlineIowa744Fan From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 931 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 3718 times:

Quoting Speedbird2155 (Reply 10):
There will be no Oneworld carriers in T4 after the reorganisation.

Is this decision final? Are they going to put the remainder of the OneWorld carriers in T5? Will the central terminal area have easier access to T5 than T4 will? Will there be any sort of tunnel connection between T5 and the central terminal area?

I also have a few more questions if some of the users that are more familiar with LHR can answer them for me. First, I was looking at a picture of T4. How come they only have single gates for the widebody positions instead of double boarding gates. I always thought that they had two jetways per gate. Also, when did they repaint the jetways white? Man, they look so much better than that hideous orange that they used to be! Granted you can still see some of the orange, but that terminal really looks nice with the white jetways and the HSBC markings.

I was also wondering if anyone knows the maximum number of larger widebodies (340s, 380s, 744s, and 777s) that can be accomodated at T1 at once. I have been trying to estimate it from these pictures:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Chris Sharps


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jan Lidestrand




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Savvas Petoussis


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Chris Sharps



It looks like 4 or so can be parked at the outside of the Europier, a couple along the connector to the main terminal, and another 3 or 4 around the middle pier used by BMI. Isn't the area where the CX plane is pictured considered T2? Would they likely have to reorganize the gate layout of the Europier to accomodate Star? I am just curious as the morning periods are very busy with all of the arrivals from UA, SQ, TG, etc. that are the larger widebodies. Would anything be done with the concourse used for the UK and Ireland departures by BA? Could that be converted to handle widebodies?

I apologize for all my questions, but I think that the whole process that LHR is undergoing is quite fascinating, I am really anxious to see how the whole reorganization process goes, and I am anxious to see if it will be repeated on a scale this large at another airport. Absolutely fascinating....yep....I am an airplane geek!  Smile


User currently offlineSpeedbird2155 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 871 posts, RR: 5
Reply 17, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 3689 times:

Quoting Iowa744Fan (Reply 16):
Is this decision final? Are they going to put the remainder of the OneWorld carriers in T5? Will the central terminal area have easier access to T5 than T4 will? Will there be any sort of tunnel connection between T5 and the central terminal area?

The only Oneworld airlines currently in T4 are BA and QF and these will move to T5. The other carriers should remain in their current locations as far as I am aware. The central terminal area and in particular T3 will indeed be easier to access from T5 than T4 would be. This is partly because of the location of the T5 in relation to the other terminals. The underground tunnel/road has already been completed to accomodate this.

As for the single jetways at T4, from the information I've gathered, some wise person within BAA made that decision during the planning stages. As has been said by some of my colleagues, T4 was conceptualised as a longhaul terminal but with a shorthaul design. We hope that this issue is addressed by T5.


User currently offlineIowa744Fan From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 931 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (9 years 3 months 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 3651 times:

Quoting Iowa744Fan (Reply 16):
Is this decision final? Are they going to put the remainder of the OneWorld carriers in T5?

Shoot, a slight mistake on my behalf. I meant to say T3, not T5. I was curious about airlines like Iberia and Finnair who operate narrowbodies to LHR and if they would just have some smaller gates in T3 or what. Any word on who is going to T4 then? Will it be non-Star, OW, and Skyteam airlines?


User currently offlineSpeedbird2155 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 871 posts, RR: 5
Reply 19, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 3520 times:

Quoting Iowa744Fan (Reply 18):
Any word on who is going to T4 then?

T4 will be Skyteam and I suspect a few other airlines. KQ, KM and UL are also likely to remain in T4. KQ and KM are comletely handled by KL and UL's ground handling is also done by KL. UL's check-in and boarding are handled by BA at present, so I'm not sure what will happen when BA moves to T5.


User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26338 posts, RR: 76
Reply 20, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3424 times:

Quoting IntheKnow (Thread starter):
The new Virgin Atlantic facilities will be so compact that passengers will only have to walk as little as 200 metres from check in to the gate.

And given that this is LHR, I am sure every centimeter of that will be a maze of duty free.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineBA380 From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 1466 posts, RR: 8
Reply 21, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3347 times:

the 200 m thing sounds somewhat like bulls***. Given a 70m+ span of a 744, they couldn't have many gates!


cabin crew: doors to automatic and cross-check...
User currently offlineLH423 From Canada, joined Jul 1999, 6501 posts, RR: 54
Reply 22, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 3289 times:

Quoting N1120A (Reply 20):
And given that this is LHR, I am sure every centimeter of that will be a maze of duty free

LOL! I did get a bit confused at Terminal 3 passing through all that duty free. I did leave smelling nice!

Anyway, I don't so much mind Richard Branson's style or the fact that he does make press releases for everything. I think the thing that gets on people is that in everything he does he tries to have a go at BA. Most of the time BA can't be bothered to compare EVERYTHING to VS. Sure, things like services on board, etc. but every airline does that. But when Richard Branson feels he has to compare every little thing to BA, it gets a bit old. Virgin have got a great product and an excellent service style. Sell the product based on its merits and strengths, not based on the competition!

LH423



« On ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux » Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
DC-8 Proves To Be Better Than 707/720 posted Sat May 26 2001 05:11:36 by DIA
BA Move To T5 At LHR To Be Staged. posted Thu Sep 21 2006 18:47:18 by TristarSteve
Another 747 At OPF To Be Scrapped (EC-IPN) posted Fri Aug 25 2006 06:06:59 by DB777
Are VS' A343s Going To Be Refitted With V:PORT? posted Thu Feb 9 2006 12:14:18 by Concorde001
Will CO's EWR-DEL Be Better Than TG JFK-BKK? posted Wed Nov 2 2005 06:22:37 by Comorin
Rabbits At ORY To Be Moved Further South! posted Mon Mar 15 2004 10:25:49 by UTA_flyingHIGH
Terminal B At Zurich To Be Torn Down? posted Sun Sep 8 2002 12:53:22 by Avion
Old Dynair Hangar At PHX To Be Demolished posted Mon Jun 17 2002 06:26:43 by Jmc1975
Shouldn't Business Class Be Better Than First? posted Sun Sep 10 2000 03:29:20 by Boeing747-400
There Has To Be Better Rates posted Tue Mar 7 2000 04:53:56 by Lecrack