ZK-NBT From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 5495 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (10 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 6946 times:
The 773 certainly carries more PAX, typical 3 class is 365 while the 772 is around 301.
The standard 773A doesn't fly nearly as far as the 772ER can which is the main version of the 772. The 773ER though can fly almost as far as the 772ER. While the 772LR will beat any other exsiting aircraft.
N1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 28503 posts, RR: 74
Reply 6, posted (10 years 7 months 3 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 6497 times:
Quoting ZK-NBT (Reply 1): The 773 certainly carries more PAX, typical 3 class is 365 while the 772 is around 301.
Which almost no one actually does. CO in a 2 class configuration only flies their 772ERs with 283.
Quoting ZK-NBT (Reply 1): The 773ER though can fly almost as far as the 772ER.
Quoting Pipo777 (Reply 3): Yeah, the 777-200A was the first out and had a range of around 4100Nm if I'm not correct with about 305pax. The 777-300A was next and was basically a stretch of the -200 and carries around 368pax.
5210nm for the 772A, 5995nm for the 773A. Confused as to why? The 773 offers significantly more thrust than the 772A (as much or more than the 772ER) as well as more fuel than is needed to overcome the weight gain. And again, they don't carry that many people