Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AZ: Unfair Subsidies Or Business As Usual?  
User currently offlineScotron11 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 1178 posts, RR: 3
Posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 1747 times:

As of this weekend, reports out of Italy are that the EU Commission is leaning toward approving AZ's restructuring plan. Plan calls for the company to be split in two, AZFly and AZService. They are awaiting guarantees from banks that the recapitalization will have no government backing.

AZService would be sold off to Fintecna (wholly owned by the Italian government) for $282M. (If that's not a subsidy, I don't know what is).

AZ got approval from the EU Commission last year for a $513M "loan" from the Italian government, to be repaid within one year and for the government to reduce their stake in the carrier from 62% now, to below 50%.

AZ started drawing on the "loan" in January. BA & LH have complained to the EU Commission that AZ has used this money to reduce fares and expand services in Eastern Europe, something which is was not meant for. Accordingly, as they have already appointed Ernst&Young to look into possible "illegal" state aid in the recapitalization plan, they have also asked them to look into the allegations of unfair pricing.

Yesterday, the Italian treasury called on AZ to seek an "industrial partner", a move that raises expectations of a tie-up with AF/KLM (What's new?).

Cimoli, AZ CEO, is pressing AF/KLM to issue lettes of intent to purchase shares in AZ when the Italian government reduces its stake. AF/KLM spokesperson denied that the group was looking to purchase shares in AZ.

My gut feeling is that the EU Commission will approve this plan come hell or high water, because there are too much politics involved. Both Chiraq and Berlusconi have stated they want to see a merged AF/KLM & AZ, and what they want they usually get.

There are a lot of discussions on these forums on A vs B, subsidies this, subsidies that. I think this is exactly the same, and should be given the contempt it deserves.

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCornish From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 8187 posts, RR: 54
Reply 1, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 1744 times:

Surprise, surprise......

The other airlines will be up in arms but nothing will happen. It does make a mockery of the supposed "free market" in Europe when AZ continually gets major handouts.

The joke is that none of these handouts have made any difference whatsoever and nothing seems to have changed over the years as a result of them.

It is still woefully overmanned, suffers from seemingly weekly strikes, has a poor route network, etc etc.

I suspect there are some VERY corrupt goings on behind the scenes at AZ and the Italian govt. This really shouldn't be allowed to happen ,but as said - it will get pushed through by Berlo and Chriac no doubt.



Just when I thought I could see light at the end of the tunnel, it was some B*****d with a torch bringing me more work
User currently offlineUN_B732 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 4289 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 1721 times:

Yeah, Berlo's such a big mafia man.
Has anyone notice how AZ's transit fares tend to be lower than everyone else (KL, AF, BA?)



What now?
User currently offlineAndreas From Germany, joined Oct 2001, 6104 posts, RR: 31
Reply 3, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1685 times:

Quoting Scotron11 (Thread starter):
BA & LH have complained to the EU Commission that AZ has used this money to reduce fares

Well, AZ did not invent this...AF did it during the early 90ies BIG TIME, and guess who complained BIG TIME? You've got it: BA and LH!

So, the thread starter is not quite correct: It's Unfair Subsidies AND Business as Usual!



I know it's only VfB but I like it!
User currently offlineScotron11 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 1178 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1628 times:

Quoting Andreas (Reply 3):

Well, AZ did not invent this...AF did it during the early 90ies BIG TIME, and guess who complained BIG TIME? You've got it: BA and LH!

I remember reading about that. Although the EU courts sided with BA & LH, the EU Commission ruled on a technicality that AF could keep the so-called "loans".

For that reason I think the EU Commission will let it through. Then the whole bunch can go and play happy airlines together.


User currently offlineTango-Bravo From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3805 posts, RR: 29
Reply 5, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 1587 times:

Quoting Scotron11 (Thread starter):
Unfair Subsidies Or Business As Usual?

Actually, it would be altogether correct to give "both" as the answer to this 2-part question.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Business As Usual At United posted Tue May 17 2005 10:39:39 by Loyal2UA
UAL Chapt 11 : Not Business As Usual :next Steps? posted Mon Dec 9 2002 16:56:36 by Keesje
TSA At DCA - Lazy As Usual posted Sun Aug 13 2006 20:54:26 by DeltaFFinDFW
Reasonable First, Or Business Class posted Fri May 12 2006 20:40:00 by Dimoko
Iberia: Making Friends As Usual! posted Fri Mar 24 2006 16:23:46 by Spantax
First Class Or Business Class posted Wed Feb 22 2006 01:14:03 by Mudboy
Boeing 747 Upper Deck - First Or Business? posted Wed Dec 14 2005 20:00:47 by 1337Delta764
Business As Usual At Delta posted Tue Jun 28 2005 23:21:35 by NYCAA
Boeing 747 Or A380 As King? posted Sun Apr 10 2005 08:44:48 by Garri767
Boeing To Act Against Airbus 'unfair' Subsidies posted Thu Jul 15 2004 01:04:12 by AvObserver