Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Historical Reference-Aviator  
User currently offlineMirrodie From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 7459 posts, RR: 60
Posted (11 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1323 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I wasn't impressed with the story line but I was surprised to learn so much about the history of TWA and Pan Am.

While I find it ironic how TWA outlived PanAm, I have one question: Was the film pretty accurate in its portrayal of its airline figures? And of the legal proceedings that followed?

Forum moderator 2001-2010; He's a pedantic, pontificating, pretentious bastard, a belligerent old fart, a worthless st
2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offline57AZ From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2586 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1292 times:

My view is that it was generally correct concerning the airline figures. Don't know for certain about the litigation end of it, but Hughes was very much hands on with TWA. Hughes brought Hollywood flair to the airline's promotion but created some problems. He was known to requisition company aircraft for his personal use at the last minute, creating problems for Dispatch (once he tied a Connie up in the Bahamas for a month, along with a paid TWA flight engineer). Other problems were that TWA didn't own its aircraft-Hughes Toolco did and the airline ended up being stuck dealing with that one lessor even after Hughes left the airline. Also, while other airlines operated the improved Douglas DC-6 and -7 series, Hughes insisted on sticking with the Constellation.

As for Pan American and Juan Trippe, they did own the foreign skies and everyone knew it. Trippe's extensive business connections and air mail contracts provided the basis for his expansion into developing markets. In many cases, Pan Am was the only airline in these markets and would remain so until after WWII. After the end of the war, other airlines began appearing and fighting for a piece of the action. This slowly and inevitably weakened Pan Am, which was not entirely used to such competition. Had the airline been better managed and realigned after Trippe's death, it may well have survived. TWA always was the small fry compared to Pan Am.

"When a man runs on railroads over half of his lifetime he is fit for nothing else-and at times he don't know that."
User currently offlineNomadic From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 470 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1283 times:

Quoting Mirrodie (Thread starter):
TWA always was the small fry compared to Pan Am.

I hardly find this to be accurate, at least not on the Atlantic. TWA was constantly chipping away at Pan Am's market share and by the 1970s they were the #1 airline from the USA to Europe.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
in reference to 'Go-ahead For Heathrow Expansion' article posted Fri Dec 8 2006 20:05:12 by Itsonlyme
Need Historical Information On National Airlines posted Sun Nov 19 2006 23:33:50 by JeckPDX
Addition To Historical OAG Website posted Wed Nov 15 2006 16:27:23 by N702ML
Historical Aircraft - How Are They "Allowed"? posted Fri Oct 20 2006 18:45:03 by BWI757
Historical LAX Photos posted Mon Aug 28 2006 23:25:53 by Travelin man
Aug 1 - A Historical Day In Malaysian Aviation posted Tue Aug 1 2006 15:56:41 by 9MMAR
Great Airline Historical Slide Show With Music posted Tue Jun 20 2006 04:57:10 by Db777
Historical Pan Am Sites posted Sat Apr 8 2006 02:30:56 by EWWForEver
Historical Flight Numbers And Regs? posted Tue Mar 28 2006 17:12:41 by CHRISBA777ER
A VS B, Mission Statements, Historical Perspective posted Tue Feb 28 2006 09:05:11 by SSTsomeday