Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Any Graphics/Images Of The A380-900?  
User currently offlineYazoo From Netherlands, joined Aug 2001, 363 posts, RR: 0
Posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 6259 times:

I've looked pretty much everywhere, but couldnt find a drawing or a 3-D image of what might be the A380-900, Im curious to see what the stretched version might look like.


Purple Pride!
39 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineKorg747 From United States, joined Mar 2003, 549 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 6101 times:

Same here. any pictures out?


Please excuse my English!
User currently offlineBoeing Nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 6065 times:

http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/stevem...il?.dir=47b3&.dnm=2ff8.jpg&.src=ph

User currently offlineVS74741R From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 272 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 5986 times:

It looks so much nicer when it's stretched. I t stops the nose ruining the plane like it does on the 800.


Obviously a Virgin Atlantic fan!!!
User currently offlinePPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 5037 posts, RR: 27
Reply 4, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 5969 times:

It really does look much nicer when stretched:





Cheers,
PPVRA


β€œWhen goods do not cross borders, soldiers will.” - Frederic Bastiat
User currently offlineAerlingus330 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 834 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 5935 times:

I agree 100%, it looks far better.

AerLingus330


Aer Lingus Airbus A330-300
User currently offlineAC787 From Canada, joined Mar 2005, 337 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 5906 times:

Its amazing how much of a difference stretching the 380 makes...I could live with that being the queen of the skies

AC787

User currently offlineBjg231 From United States, joined May 2004, 163 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 5899 times:

Wow, it's not hideous anymore. Actually, it looks quite impressive.


If at first you don't succeed, then skydiving is not for you.
User currently offlineYazoo From Netherlands, joined Aug 2001, 363 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 5855 times:

it looks much like an 340 double decker.

Is it just me or do I have the feeling that the 380-800 is somewhat the 747SP version of -900 model?


Purple Pride!
User currently offlineNorCal From United States, joined Mar 2005, 1289 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 5791 times:

Soooo much better stretched  Smile


"Rapid decompression leads to involuntary exiting of the Aircraft"
User currently offlineAerlingus330 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 834 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 5753 times:

Apart from the Length, wieght and ability to carry more passengers ect. Will there be better range capibalitys, less range capibilitys or any other advantages or disadvantages that the A380-900 will have over the A380-800?

AerLingus330


Aer Lingus Airbus A330-300
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States, joined Mar 2004, 7684 posts, RR: 55
Reply 11, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 5740 times:

Quoting Yazoo (Reply 8):
Is it just me or do I have the feeling that the 380-800 is somewhat the 747SP version of -900 model?

The stretch does look much more proportional....  Smile

User currently offlineDeltaWings From Switzerland, joined Aug 2004, 1256 posts, RR: 16
Reply 12, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 5689 times:

How many pax will the A389 take? About 920?


~DeltaWings


Homer: Marge, it takes two to lie. One to lie and one to listen.
User currently offlineN276AASTT From Virgin Islands (US), joined Jan 2004, 618 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 5687 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Wow, it would truely be amazing to see something of that size get off the ground. I'm reminded of the current A380 photo showing the engine runup, how big the A380 is already compared to the A340 behind it. Wow.


Dejale Caer tu el Peso! YOMO
User currently offlineAirPacific747 From Denmark, joined May 2008, 23 posts, RR: 12
Reply 14, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 5673 times:

much more beautiful as a stretched version!  bigthumbsup 

User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States, joined Sep 2004, 12780 posts, RR: 57
Reply 15, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 5588 times:

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 11):

The stretch does look much more proportional

true, the stretch version does look more proportional, however.....

1)still a monstrosity
2) still looks hideous


"Up The Irons!"
User currently offlineBtblue From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 120 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 5584 times:

Is that an image created by airbus? Is it available on their website?

I'm sorry but that looks like it's been stretched too much - does nobody agree?

The pic of the Emirates plane has two doors before the wing yet on the aircraft with the Airbus livery it has 3.

I don't think the 900 will be as long as is illustrated in those images.

User currently offlineVS74741R From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 272 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 5531 times:

Quoting Btblue (Reply 16):
Is that an image created by airbus? Is it available on their website?

Someone designed it on the internet, it hasn't come from Airbus.


Obviously a Virgin Atlantic fan!!!
User currently offlineIslipWN From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 5526 times:

I didn't know they had plans of making a stretch version of the A380.

I also agree that it looks much nicer when its stretched!!


Joe

User currently offlineAmy From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 1150 posts, RR: 10
Reply 19, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 5462 times:

I would agree the -900 does look more appealing, but then I think in general longer aircraft do.


A340-300 - slow, but awesome!
User currently offlineVS74741R From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 272 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 5403 times:

I think it looks nicer because the Tail and wings match the size of the fuselage where as the A388 has the same wings and tail but a short stubby body.


Obviously a Virgin Atlantic fan!!!
User currently offlineLehpron From United States, joined Jul 2001, 7027 posts, RR: 18
Reply 21, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 5385 times:

Holy Faker!  Wow!

I do think that A389 rendering is rather over-stretched, it looks like it has way too many doors and may be over 300 feet long, enough for 1500 pax in 3 classes!

Quoting IslipWN (Reply 18):
I didn't know they had plans of making a stretch version of the A380.

A380's wing was designed for the potential stretch version way back when, otherwise the wing would not need to be so massive. Technically, it would be like Boeing building the 747SP first.


The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
User currently offlineHenny From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 99 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 5267 times:

Quoting Btblue (Reply 16):
Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 11):

The stretch does look much more proportional

true, the stretch version does look more proportional, however.....

1) still a monstrosity
2) still looks hideous

They both mean the same thing.... anyway...

How about something positive, a la "I don't like the look of it, but well done to the hundreds of Airbus engineers who sat up nights so I could slobber over it and grunt "bleah... 'orrible... monstrosity!" :|


3, 2, 1... Now!
User currently offlineBCNGRO From Andorra, joined Oct 2004, 584 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4783 times:

It looks far better! It definitely doesn't have that sort of "735 look" from the -800 anymore. It looks much more proportional

Quoting Amy (Reply 19):
I would agree the -900 does look more appealing, but then I think in general longer aircraft do.

I think stretched planes look better when the original version doesn't look proportional (as the 380-800), but when the original version looks already proportional, the stretched version doesn't necessarily look better. The 321, for instance, looks worse than the 320 to me.

Just my 0.02€
BCNGRO

[Edited 2005-04-10 01:18:40]


At the bus station, buses stop. At the train station, trains stop. At my desk, I have a work station.