Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Impact Of The 787 On Global Markets  
User currently offlineB707Stu From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 918 posts, RR: 4
Posted (9 years 3 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3506 times:

As the 707 had a huge impact on the world, eg opening up new routes, shrinking the world, opening up more cargo, I'm curious to hear what y'all think the impact of the 787 capacities will have, especially on the world's hubs, eg London, Paris, Tokyo, JFK, FRA, MXP, etc...

For starters I can see many SOuth Asian (Indian bound) passengers taking non-stops from the US to India and by-passing European stops, decreasing traffic and reducing revenues. Also, what does it mean to Tokyo to have so many point-to-point North American-Asian flights that will obviously emerge. What will all this mean to commerce? freight? communication? politics?

Let the dialogue begin!

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 957 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (9 years 3 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3472 times:

Quoting B707Stu (Thread starter):
What will all this mean to commerce? freight? communication? politics?

It will probably encourage more open-skies agreements, or at least further liberalize markets that will remain restricted.

Quoting B707Stu (Thread starter):
Also, what does it mean to Tokyo to have so many point-to-point North American-Asian flights that will obviously emerge

We aren't going to see LIT-NRT, but what we will probably see is cities like DFW and DEN (which are large cities with suprisingly weak international diversity) finally see some strong international offerings. Pleanty of examples in Europe, Asia, and elsewhere.

Quoting B707Stu (Thread starter):
I'm curious to hear what y'all think the impact of the 787 capacities will have, especially on the world's hubs, eg London, Paris, Tokyo, JFK, FRA, MXP, etc...

I think it will be to the Pacific/Asian market what the 767 was to the Atlantic market.


User currently offlineB707Stu From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 918 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (9 years 3 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3464 times:

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 1):
We aren't going to see LIT-NRT, but what we will probably see is cities like DFW and DEN (which are large cities with suprisingly weak international diversity) finally see some strong international offerings. Pleanty of examples in Europe, Asia, and elsewhere.

Interesting you saw it this way, I was thinking that NRT would lose a lot of traffic, not gain. I was thinking we'd see DEN-BEJ or DFW-SIN type services. Come to think of it that means LAX and SEA, as hubs would experience reduced traffic too.

Do you think it'll have impact on airfares?


User currently offlineAtmx2000 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 4576 posts, RR: 38
Reply 3, posted (9 years 3 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3414 times:

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 1):
It will probably encourage more open-skies agreements, or at least further liberalize markets that will remain restricted.

It may lead to more open skies agreements, but it might also encourage countries to restrict 5th and 6th freedom rights for foreign carriers, since nonstop routes for their flag airlines may become viable solely on the basis of O&D traffic. Their national airlines will not need as much access to convenient international hubs and their passenger traffic to fill flights to more distant locations.



ConcordeBoy is a twin supremacist!! He supports quadicide!!
User currently offlineDarthRandall From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 302 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (9 years 3 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3394 times:

Quoting B707Stu (Reply 2):
Interesting you saw it this way, I was thinking that NRT would lose a lot of traffic, not gain. I was thinking we'd see DEN-BEJ or DFW-SIN type services. Come to think of it that means LAX and SEA, as hubs would experience reduced traffic too.

NRT probably would lose traffic as direct flights to other major cities on the Pacific Rim become available. I don't imagine that it will affect the hubs in the states as much in terms of overall traffic, because there probably will not be enough demand in the interior cities to justify flying 787s across the Pacific. LAX may see a drop-off as flights from PHX and DFW are able to go direct to places like SIN, but I don't expect too much beyond that.



Ninjas can kill anyone they want! Ninjas cut off heads all the time and don't even think twice about it.
User currently offlineB707Stu From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 918 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (9 years 3 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3284 times:

My guess is DL buys a bunch, when they manage to get their act together, and ATL goes to a whole new level of hub.

User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Reply 6, posted (9 years 3 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3251 times:

Um, Boeing did the market research and figured there was a need for such a product (as all companies), and 787 in this case will simply fill that projected need.

It is only new to all of us who do not sit analyzing numerical trends all day, believe me it is beyond boring!

Back in the day when 707 was being made, Boeing had a hunch it would revolutionize air travel, they didn't have to do a market watch. Nowadays, building a product just to watch what happens, whatever you may believe in, is sheer lunacy. Nothing is done until those investing in the idea believe it will work and that take a hell of a lot of data!

[Edited 2005-04-12 07:22:08]


The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
User currently offlineNAV20 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 9909 posts, RR: 36
Reply 7, posted (9 years 3 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 3195 times:

Quoting B707Stu (Thread starter):
For starters I can see many SOuth Asian (Indian bound) passengers taking non-stops from the US to India and by-passing European stops

Slight correction, Stu - the 787 is so far planned to have the same sort of range as the 747/A380, around 8,500 nms. Boeing's strategy appears to be two-pronged - it will be the Extended/Longer Range versions of the 777 that are likely to open up a new 'non-stop' field; indeed, Pakistan were the first order them and India looks like following their lead soon.

What I think the 787 WILL do - if the promised fuel economies eventuate - is make it possible to fly smaller numbers of passengers to a wider range of destinations at seat/mile costs that are comparable with, or even lower than, those of larger aeroplanes. For many years, before fuel costs rose to danger levels, the 'recognised' way to keep seat/mile costs down was to build bigger aeroplanes that could pack in more and more people; but this inevitably meant that airlines could only offer customers a limited range of destinations - basically the places the majority of a given load wanted to go to, with the minority needing to take a further local flight.

I definitely have the feeling that the 787 will change the field a lot. But not quite on the scale that the Comet 4/707 changed things. That was REALLY radical!



"Once you have flown, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards.." - Leonardo da Vinci
User currently offlineNorCal From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 2459 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (9 years 3 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3144 times:

Quoting Lehpron (Reply 6):
Nowadays, building a product just to watch what happens, whatever you may believe in, is sheer lunacy. Nothing is done until those investing in the idea believe it will work and that take a hell of a lot of data!

I totally I agree, risk taking is sacrificed in order to please the share holders.  Sad


User currently offlineN79969 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (9 years 3 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3137 times:

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 1):
I think it will be to the Pacific/Asian market what the 767 was to the Atlantic market.

I think this sums it up real well. 25 years ago, it would have been strange to discuss flights connecting Cincinatti or Charlotte to Paris or Frankfurt. That's clearly changed.

Boeing mentioned Phoenix to Shanghai as a 787 route some time ago. Seems strange now but if the 787's economics are as transforming as Boeing promises, then I do not see why not.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Virtual Construction Of The 787 posted Tue Nov 7 2006 20:15:06 by NYC777
Economics Of The 787-8 Vs 767-300ER posted Wed Jun 14 2006 02:49:25 by Baron95
Are These Updated Pics Of The 787 Interior? posted Thu Feb 16 2006 09:32:01 by BigMac
Negative Impact Of No-frills On Eastern Europe posted Mon Oct 24 2005 11:33:12 by Orion737
The 777 Future In The Hands Of The 787 posted Thu Apr 28 2005 13:54:45 by GodBless
Production Of The 787 posted Thu Mar 31 2005 02:50:28 by COAIAH
History Of The Concorde On PBS Tonight (Jan18) posted Tue Jan 18 2005 20:53:50 by Ktliem@yvr
Impact Of The 737 posted Sat Oct 2 2004 22:30:41 by Pilotchris
Day 2 Of The Mess On The East Coast posted Tue Apr 13 2004 22:18:04 by Flairport
Impact Of EU Tariffs On Boeing? posted Thu Dec 11 2003 09:35:08 by Joni
The Value Of The 787 posted Fri Apr 2 2010 20:32:28 by will777
Status Of The "Miracle On The Hudson" Airplane? posted Tue Aug 18 2009 15:56:16 by Blackbird1331
Impact Of EK/QR On India-IAH/LAX/SFO Traffic posted Mon Aug 10 2009 09:46:31 by Ojas
Boeing's Management Of The 787 Program posted Sun Jul 12 2009 14:16:07 by TomB
Long Term Effects Of The 787/A350 posted Sat Feb 28 2009 23:40:30 by BMI727