Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Start-up Airline Idea  
User currently offlineBizJet From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 275 posts, RR: 0
Posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1996 times:

I came up with this idea for a start-up airline, and I wanted to hear opinions about it.

Thinking about the US Airways strike, I realized how many people hate US Airways. Most of them haven't flown them since the old USAir days when they were truly awful.

Nonetheless, of the three main US Airways hubs, Philadelphia, Charlotte, and Pittsburgh, there is virtually no alternative for nonstop flights.

Charlotte and Pittsburgh are literally locked down, while Philadelphia is slightly less locked down by US Airways.

So I thought a start-up airline operating out of one of the US Airways hubs, in direct competition to them, could possibly work because so many people hate US Airways.

Then there is the issue of which one. I came up with Philadelphia. First, it has the largest population of the three cities. Also, it has the most corporations based there. Second, it is located directly on the Northeast corridor. By train, someone could go from PHL Airport to downtown Washington or midtown Manhattan in three hours. SEPTA has a rail link between PHL Airport and downtown Philly, with a stop at 30th Street Station. From 30th, Amtrak can take you to DC or Manhattan in two hours, less with Metroliner or the upcoming Acela Express.

Many people connect on AA or UA or DL just to avoid US Airways. So if this airline could offer cheap flights, good schedules, and great service, I think people will flock over from US Airways.

ValuJet boomed in comparason with Delta before the crash. Many people don't remember it, but ValuJet was amazing. They are still doing pretty well today as AirTran.

The airline would focus on two groups: first the business traveler, then the leisure traveler (snowbird) to Florida.

Proposed name: CityJet Airways

Looking forward to hearing your ideas,

BizJet

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBoeing757/767 From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 2281 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1897 times:

As you know, airlines are very protective of their hubs. US would undoubtedly resort to near-predatory practices by matching fares on the routes, offering double miles and other amenities. Unless you're a Southwest, it's unlikely anyone can make a dent in a US hub (like BWI was).


Free-thinking, left-leaning secularist
User currently offlineBizJet From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 275 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1893 times:

Yes, that is true. But there are many exceptions:

1. ValuJet/AirTran has survived with predatory pricing by Delta.
2. Sun Country and Northwest
3. ProAir and Detroit (though different airports)

My point is that if we could drag customers from US Airways by offering reliability, service, and comfort, it might work.

BizJet


User currently offlineLHMark From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 7255 posts, RR: 47
Reply 3, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1892 times:

Most customers won't make airline selections based on emotion. They view airlines as a commodity- all basicall y the same (equally crappy). My father is a very frequent flyer and, half the time, he can't even remember which airline's plane he just stepped off. You'd find that people will, by an overwhelming majority, choose to fly the cheapest fare., regardless of how badly they're treated. That's why hubs are uncrackable unless a startup has tremendous capital resources to ride out the immediate and inevitable price war.


"Sympathy is something that shouldn't be bestowed on the Yankees. Apparently it angers them." - Bob Feller
User currently offlineBizJet From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 275 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1891 times:

Ok, well, see if you help me with this...

Instead of going into a major airline hub, how about the same idea (airline serving both business and leisure travelers) but with a different city.

My other idea was Greensboro/High-Point.



User currently offlineLHMark From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 7255 posts, RR: 47
Reply 5, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1889 times:

That would have a better chance of succeeding. I'd position it as a low-cost business-travel focused airline. Companies are doing ANYTHING to save an extra buck or two in the travel dept, even if they have to shuttle their employees to distant cities to catch a plane. Maybe a coach or rail connection to charlotte... maybe even regular ground shuttle stops at various company locations (could be pre-arranged) so employees could get right from the office to the plane, like a hotel courtesy shuttle. Employees won't be as annoyed if you remove the commute hassle.

I don't know about route structure. I'm sure you've given it a lot of thought. I'd go with frequent flights w/ small, new equipment- 737NGs or RJs.



"Sympathy is something that shouldn't be bestowed on the Yankees. Apparently it angers them." - Bob Feller
User currently offlineXNV From Canada, joined Jan 2000, 142 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1887 times:

The name CityJet is already taken... I think they are operated by or affiliated with Jersey European Airlines.


User currently offlineJohn From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 1374 posts, RR: 5
Reply 7, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1865 times:

BizJet, do you have any evidence to back up your accusations, concerning US Airways and their customers? Or could this be your own synopsis that you're trying to rub off on everyone else? Please DO NOT assume that everyone hates US Airways, because you and I know that's absolutely not true!In this industry, it is next to impossible to please 100 percent of the people, 100% of the time! There's always those few people in the crowd that are chronic complainers or whiners, and some people have a particuar airline they just love to hate, for whatever reason. There's some personalities you just can't ever please, but that's just a fact of life!Case and point, all airlines at one point or another will have a service failure or a flight cancellation, we're human and we deal with very complicated pieces of machinery. It's how you handle that failure that MAKES the DIFFERENCE!To single out US Airways in your statement was just plain wrong. US Airways has many loyal customers who are pleased with the service it provides on a daily basis, on good days and bad.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Start-up Airline Idea posted Fri Mar 31 2000 17:59:59 by BizJet
Lufthansa To Start-up Airline In India? posted Sun Jul 16 2006 12:15:20 by Johnny
Start-up Airline posted Wed Jun 28 2006 12:07:58 by Dw9115
New Mexican Start Up Airline posted Fri Jan 13 2006 01:36:33 by RvA340
New Start Up Airline "Vacances Air Columbus" posted Thu Jan 17 2002 04:31:57 by BWIA330
Top 2 Aircraft For A Start-up Airline. posted Wed Sep 5 2001 01:51:52 by BA
New Start Up Airline Looking At Trinidad Market posted Tue Aug 21 2001 07:39:19 by BWIA330
Slogan Wanted By The Lord For New Start Up Airline posted Mon Feb 19 2001 23:42:35 by Cedarjet
YMQ, New Start-up, Any Idea? posted Tue Mar 14 2000 04:10:52 by Aad665
START-UP Airline Survey posted Tue Dec 7 1999 23:33:41 by Erau