Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
America West Interested In UsAir.  
User currently offlineTu154 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 375 posts, RR: 4
Posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 4989 times:

America West may be interested in funding UsAirways. Read the link below.





http://biz.yahoo.com/deal/050415/usairwayssearchesforcash.html?.v=2


FIRST ON THE ATLANTIC.....FIRST ON THE PACIFIC.....FIRST IN LATIN AMERICA...FIRST 'ROUND THE WORLD.....PAN AM!!
28 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently onlineERJ170 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 6747 posts, RR: 18
Reply 1, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 4961 times:

YEAH!!! That would be a good thing for both groups! HP could go international beyond Mexico and Canada.. US could finally get a presence in the west through the codeshare... It could also mean a codeshare through Royal Jordan, America West, and USAirways.. and it would answer the question of why HP is on the board at CLT... ahhh.. so many questions answered with one simple move...


Aiming High and going far..
User currently offlineRedFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 4312 posts, RR: 29
Reply 2, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 4857 times:

I'm not sure how this would help HP. Does HP think it's bleeding red because it doesn't have access to Mexico or Canada? I'm not quite sure how one disfunctional money-losing airline funding (with what little reserves it may have) another disfunctional money-losing airline is going to help both.


I'm not a racist...I hate Biden, too.
User currently offlineJdaniel001 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 4834 times:

Maybe HP will join Star?

User currently offlinePHLBOS From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 7506 posts, RR: 24
Reply 4, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 4832 times:

A similar thread on the subject was created last week.

http://www.airliners.net/discussions...general_aviation/read.main/2045310



"TransEastern! You'll feel like you've never left the ground because we treat you like dirt!" SNL Parady ad circa 1981
User currently onlineERJ170 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 6747 posts, RR: 18
Reply 5, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 4833 times:

Quoting RedFlyer (Reply 2):
Does HP think it's bleeding red because it doesn't have access to Mexico or Canada?

Correction.. HP already flies to Mexico AND Canada, as does US Airways.. however, US Airways flies to many European and Caribbean destination that HP does not fly to. And HP already has flights to many of US European and Caribbean gateway..

likewise, US already flies to HP's hubs that will offer US flights to Hawaii and the Mexico destinations that US doesn't cover.. so it is a good cooperative route network between HP and US.. if you can't see that, then dang!



Aiming High and going far..
User currently offlineJamake1 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 1004 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 4694 times:

Good: Let the consolidation and the divorces begin.

HP can have US.

UA dumps US and US leaves Star Alliance.

UA courts CO and CO joins Star Alliance.

DL and NW, the two jealous step-sisters, kick CO out of Sky Team.

Star Alliance will have hubs in SFO, LAX, DEN, IAH, ORD, IAD, and EWR.

Perfect!



United's B747-400. "She's a a cruel lover."
User currently offlineDAYflyer From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3807 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 4660 times:

Quoting Jamake1 (Reply 6):
Good: Let the consolidation and the divorces begin.

HP can have US.

UA dumps US and US leaves Star Alliance.

UA courts CO and CO joins Star Alliance.

DL and NW, the two jealous step-sisters, kick CO out of Sky Team.

Star Alliance will have hubs in SFO, LAX, DEN, IAH, ORD, IAD, and EWR.

Perfect!

Followed by bankruptcy and liquidation of both US and HP.



One Nation Under God
User currently offlineAvek00 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 4336 posts, RR: 19
Reply 8, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 4607 times:

Quoting ERJ170 (Reply 5):
so it is a good cooperative route network between HP and US..

Are you kidding me?

The route networks are almost completely disconnected from each other, and have minimal opportunities for cross-carrier feed. If HP had retained its CMH hub, or if US had retained a significant intra-West Coast operation, the case for a tie-up would be stronger.

Not to mention, of course, that US and HP target completely different market segments. Simply put, HP's business model places a much stronger emphasis on catering to leisure flyers than US' does, a result of being based in two of the lowest-yield hubs in the country. That said, should HP and US join forces, HP will be in an excellent position to capture additional PHX/LAS-bound business traffic, at US' expense of course.

US would also likely find HP consistently undercutting its fares on codeshare itineraries, causing US to be WORSE off revenue-wise than if it had just stayed independent. While a narrowly-tailored codesharing arrangement with HP could possibly work, a broad codesharing deal between US and HP would likely be inadvisable for US' finances going forward.



Live life to the fullest.
User currently offlineDallas74 From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 95 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 4567 times:

This would be great - for Southwest!

Instead of bleeding two carriers to death with low fares they can kill two birds with one stone. PHL, BWI, PIT, LAS, and PHX are all LUV cities where AWA and U can't get any pricing traction.

Given the fact the merger will have a boat load of costs the next new destination for this merged carrier would be the nearest US Bankruptcy Court!


User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13469 posts, RR: 62
Reply 10, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 4479 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Until the CASM at US falls and the RASM at HP rises, this would be like trying to make a boat by chaining two anchors together.


"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlineOuboy79 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 4541 posts, RR: 22
Reply 11, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 4443 times:

Quoting Avek00 (Reply 8):
The route networks are almost completely disconnected from each other, and have minimal opportunities for cross-carrier feed. If HP had retained its CMH hub, or if US had retained a significant intra-West Coast operation, the case for a tie-up would be stronger.

I am hoping you made an error in making this statement? The CMH hub was the weakest example of a hub we've seen in a while. The whole purpose was to allow flights to the NE because HP's early fleet types couldn't make it nonstop. Eventually the hub went to mostly ERJs. Not a strong hub...and not one that would really make a damn bit of difference.

As far as a merger goes...the route networks work very well together. There would be significant opportunity for launching new services out of PHX and CLT to cities in both networks. In the HP system you'd likely see flights to PDX, SLC, OAK, OMA, OKC, AUS, SAT, etc. added to the system out of CLT and/or PHL. On the flip side you'd see several markets in the US network to the system out of PHX.

Quoting Avek00 (Reply 8):
Not to mention, of course, that US and HP target completely different market segments. Simply put, HP's business model places a much stronger emphasis on catering to leisure flyers than US' does, a result of being based in two of the lowest-yield hubs in the country. That said, should HP and US join forces, HP will be in an excellent position to capture additional PHX/LAS-bound business traffic, at US' expense of course.

This is obvious...but the HP model domestically is the way the country is going. The best thing that could happen would be the domestic service take on the HP model and allow the international service follow the US model.

Quoting Dallas74 (Reply 9):
This would be great - for Southwest!

Instead of bleeding two carriers to death with low fares they can kill two birds with one stone. PHL, BWI, PIT, LAS, and PHX are all LUV cities where AWA and U can't get any pricing traction.

Given the fact the merger will have a boat load of costs the next new destination for this merged carrier would be the nearest US Bankruptcy Court!

Would it be great? I highly doubt Southwest would want another national carrier with the foot print HP/US would come up with. If they are able to keep the CASM low (still waiting to see what US's fell too in Q1) then WN wouldn't be that happy. Of course it would apply greater presure to the other majors which would idealy spur consolidation which will be good for everyone.

Also, you continue to press PIT when you discuss US. Its not a hub anymore, just merely a focus city. You also always mention BWI...US dehubbed that MANY moons ago - its time to update your facts. As far as either carrier gaining any traction in these cities...HP seems to be hanging with WN just fine in PHX and LAS.

Yes mergers cost a lot...and if you read the media reports out there, they all point to a third party footing the billing for such a merger. US is already under Ch11 protection...and its not far fetched to think Mesa will come out from behind to buy up as much of US as possible to integrate it into HP.



Any opinion/comment posted is that of my own and not that of Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineTWA902fly From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 3121 posts, RR: 4
Reply 12, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 4397 times:

Quoting ERJ170 (Reply 5):
likewise, US already flies to HP's hubs that will offer US flights to Hawaii and the Mexico destinations that US doesn't cover.. so it is a good cooperative route network between HP and US.. if you can't see that, then dang!

America West does not fly to Hawaii, and neither does USAirways... but they both have access to Hawaii, HP via Hawaiian and USAirways through United, and fly to all of their hubs with service to Hawaii ORD DEN LAX SFO. And not only that, i believe HP sends its passengers on BA's flight from Phoenix to London, and BA vice-versa to San Diego, Tucson...(or is that over)

TWA902



life wasn't worth the balance, or the crumpled paper it was written on
User currently offlineTockeyhockey From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 950 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 4374 times:

Quoting Avek00 (Reply 8):
The route networks are almost completely disconnected from each other

PHL seems a logical meeting spot -- move people in from the west, shoot them off to europe, or down to SXM!


User currently offline7E72004 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3587 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 4351 times:

What about HP and IndyAir? Independence air has most of its flights in the east which would complement HP's route structure based in the west.


The next generation of aircraft is just around the corner!
User currently offlineGalapagapop From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 910 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 4334 times:

Won't happen. And if it did happen will the name stay America West or will it be US Airways? still don't see it. The fleet matches though but thats it, not to mention US's track record and interest in the West, and HP's track record in the East. The only way this really would worked was if HP was to redo US from the ground up by putting the 757's and other 733's on domestic routes that HP would find appealing for an LCC model. Keep PHL, seeing as HP is one of only a few carriers that can co-exist with WN, which is amazing seeing as HP's hubs are WN's 2 largest cities. I'm also sure HP could use the LGA shuttle and other parts of US to their favor, but its unlikely seeing as HP has cash problems of their own.

User currently offlineAirknight From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 27 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 4009 times:

from a dollars and cents, standpoint, it makes no sense (pardon the pun), but its not like the airlines (and transportation industry as a whole) learn from their mistakes, so i would not be surprised if something like this would happen

User currently offlineRDUDDJI From Lesotho, joined Jun 2004, 1446 posts, RR: 3
Reply 17, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3754 times:

Quoting 7E72004 (Reply 14):
What about HP and IndyAir? Independence air has most of its flights in the east which would complement HP's route structure based in the west.

That makes slightly more sense than HP-US, but it won't happen. Without a huge cash infusion, none of the aforementioned carriers (ex. WN) can afford to buy anyone anytime soon. I've always thought F9 and DH would make a good team one day...West meets East and all that, but not in the current operating/revenue enviornment



Sometimes we don't realize the good times when we're in them
User currently offlineSonOfACaptain From United States of America, joined May 2004, 1747 posts, RR: 6
Reply 18, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3554 times:

Folks, never in this article did it mentioned that they were going to merge. In fact, it said the exact opposite. So don't get to hyped up about it. All the article is saying is that HP may provide the final money US needs to exit bankruptcy. This then may lead to an ALLIANCE, not a merger.

On a side not, US would never do anything to risk its membership in Star.

-SOAC



Non Illegitimi Carborundum
User currently offlineTango-Bravo From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3802 posts, RR: 29
Reply 19, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3521 times:

Quoting Jamake1 (Reply 6):
Good: Let the consolidation and the divorces begin.

HP can have US.

UA dumps US and US leaves Star Alliance.

UA courts CO and CO joins Star Alliance.

DL and NW, the two jealous step-sisters, kick CO out of Sky Team.

Star Alliance will have hubs in SFO, LAX, DEN, IAH, ORD, IAD, and EWR.

Perfect!

Sounds more like a plot that one might see in the theatrical soap opera world of professional wrestling!


User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 957 posts, RR: 51
Reply 20, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3388 times:

Quoting Ouboy79 (Reply 11):
Would it be great? I highly doubt Southwest would want another national carrier with the foot print HP/US would come up with.

WN are manuevering around US like they aren't even aliave any more. How would an HP merger change that in the near term?

If you take 2-3 years to regroup the two airlines into a serious competitive force, WN's grown a minimum of 25% in that amount of time. Factor in market dynamics (i.e. high oil) that are unpredictible to all but a select few airlines (i.e. WN, again) and I don't see how this would pose a threat to WN (if it even took place)  hot 


User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 21, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3370 times:

People, People, PEOPLE!!!!! Whats the matter with you all?! We all know that this is NOT going to happen! Why on earth do you all think this is going to happen? HP knows if they bought US they'd be in the toilet in the next day and will never get out of it.

Remember HP CEO Parker abandoned the idea of aquiring ATA because he thought that it wasn't worth the hassle of dealing with ATA's problems. What makes you think HP is interested in US? If Parker abandoned the idea of taking ATA, you can bet Parker wont even take US either.... food for thought.....



A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineByrdluvs747 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 2340 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2792 times:

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 21):
Remember HP CEO Parker abandoned the idea of aquiring ATA because he thought that it wasn't worth the hassle of dealing with ATA's problems.

More accurately, HP didn't go forward because what they would have ended up with was an airline with too few planes. The pullout really had less to do with ATA's "problems", as much as the value HP would have received.

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 21):
What makes you think HP is interested in US?

Hmmmmm, 757's, Carribean & Central American routes, East coast network, gates.



The 747: The hands who designed it were guided by god.
User currently onlineERJ170 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 6747 posts, RR: 18
Reply 23, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2697 times:

Alright everyone.. let's get this straight.. somehow we have veered off the point of this post..

America West is not going to BUY US Airways.. the post stated that America West and US Airways would go into a codeshare agreement and America West would infuse the remaining $100M cash into US Airways.. It was not mentioned that America West would buy or merge or take-over US Airways..

Industry sources said that Tempe, Ariz.-based America West, operator of the nation's eighth-largest airline, could be interested in providing the remainder of the funding US Airways needs. Any deal between the two companies would probably fall well short of a merger, with the airlines likely agreeing to a code-sharing alliance to coordinate schedules and sell tickets on each other's flights.

Now lets get this back on track...

[Edited 2005-04-16 13:42:52]

[Edited 2005-04-16 13:43:08]


Aiming High and going far..
User currently offlineAvek00 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 4336 posts, RR: 19
Reply 24, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2653 times:

US Airways would likely be able to codeshare with HP without jeopardizing its membership in Star Alliance. That said, there would still be two issues to consider:

1. Does the UA/US codesharing agreement, which is separate from the Star agreements, preclude US from entering into an alliance with another major US airline without United's approval?

and

2. Will US find it economically worthwhile to remain in the Star Alliance (with the associated costs) vs. ditching the alliance and maintaining bilateral agreements with some of the member carriers (e.g., UA/LH/AC).



Live life to the fullest.
25 CactusTECH : As far as us in maintenance department at America West what we hear is that we would kill for 757's right now before the year is over and we start our
26 NWADC9 : No, that would never happen! NW and CO are buddies. They were codeshares, along with Delta, even before they joined Star. They're staying in SkyTeam.
27 Avek00 : CO and NW are not married to each other - there are provisions in the alliance agreement that allow either party to terminate with as little as 12 mo
28 AirframeAS : Then the thread needs to be renamed.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
B737 - America West Livery In JNB posted Sun Nov 5 2006 10:46:45 by SA7700
America West 757s In US Airways Colors posted Tue Mar 21 2006 09:30:58 by Thegooddoctor
America West 757 In GRR posted Wed Dec 28 2005 00:07:46 by N723GW
America West EX. In JAX? posted Mon Nov 28 2005 00:27:44 by Juanchie
US Airways/America West's Future In Star Alliance? posted Fri Nov 18 2005 06:45:18 by B777A340Fan
Goodbye America West, If In Title Only. posted Sat Oct 1 2005 01:06:13 by Redneckslim
USAir/America West Merger Vs. USAir/PSA posted Fri May 20 2005 09:13:50 by IslandHopperCO
America West A320 In MOB Today posted Sun Jun 15 2003 01:40:45 by MSYtristar
America West Excels In Q1 2002 posted Mon May 6 2002 21:52:26 by Jmc1975
America West In El Salvador? posted Fri Oct 27 2006 09:14:14 by AirTranTUS