Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why A330 To Replace The B767?  
User currently offlineAsianguy767 From Singapore, joined Oct 2003, 263 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 7041 times:

I'm curious why B767 operators have chosen the A330 as a replacement instead of the B767-400ER? I understand for some its a fleet realignment with some airlines getting the A340 together with the A330 like SAS but what about those airlines that don't operate the A340 and yet have chosen the A330 to replace their B767s like EVA Air, Qantas & Asiana. Surely using the B767-400ER as a replacement would cost less to these B767 operators than introducing a new aircraft type. Is it a range issue or a timing thing? Please enlighten me and pardon my ignorance.

40 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineRichard28 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2003, 1633 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 6824 times:

I'm not an expert, but understand that the cargo hold of the A330 (which takes pallets) is much larger than the B674

User currently onlineIndy From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 4595 posts, RR: 18
Reply 2, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 6808 times:

As a passenger I like the A330-300 better. I would pick it over the 767 any day. Just my opinion. Cargo from what I have been told in the past is the big deal. So that would be a big plus. A nicer interior is just icing on the cake.


Indy = Indianapolis and not Independence Air
User currently offlineAvek00 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 4417 posts, RR: 19
Reply 3, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 6773 times:

Cargo was the big issue with the 764 - it faces a significant cargo disadvantage vice the 330. That said:

1. QF got its 330s for a song for ordering the A380;
2. The Boeing 787, which is designed to replace the 767, is selling like hotcakes; and
3. The A330 has proven itself to be an absolute dog on high-frequency short-haul missions - to QF's and MH's chagrin, the 330 simply was not built for runs like SYD-MEL and SIN-KUL.



Live life to the fullest.
User currently offlineFlight152 From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 3413 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 6763 times:

As a passenger I like the A330-300 better.

Uhh. Care to explain why?


User currently offlineKdeg00 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 145 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 6760 times:

I know I like the 330/340 better than the 767 from a cabin noise standpoint. I started using SAS to Europe from SEA after they replaced the 767 with the 343 and have had much more comfortable trips.

User currently offlineStar_world From Ireland, joined Jun 2001, 1234 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 6734 times:

Quoting Indy (Reply 2):
As a passenger I like the A330-300 better



Quoting Flight152 (Reply 4):
Uhh. Care to explain why?

Uhh...  Smile I'd definitely agree with Indy on this one - much quieter cabin, usually more modern interiors (with a few exceptions) and almost always better IFE. Nothing wrong with the 763 at all, have flown many, many transatlantic flights on them, but the 330 is a much more modern feeling aircraft.


User currently onlineIndy From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 4595 posts, RR: 18
Reply 7, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 6722 times:

Quoting Flight152 (Reply 4):
As a passenger I like the A330-300 better.

Uhh. Care to explain why?

The inflight entertainment is killer! And its a quiet ride. Nothing wrong with the 767. It is a good ride too. I just think the 330-300 is better.



Indy = Indianapolis and not Independence Air
User currently offlineXkorpyoh From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 821 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 6709 times:

I just flew on CO's 764 and loved it more than the 330s. The cabin interior of the 764 is just like the 777. PTVs and very spacious and confy.
I like the 330s but not crazy about them.


User currently offlineACYWG From Canada, joined Feb 2005, 265 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 6605 times:

I personally have an answer for those of us that fly AC regularly on the long hauls. I highly prefer AC's A333's over the 767's cause the 333's have Rolls-Royce Trent engines....and If there is a better sounding engine on an AC plane....I haven't yet found it. Though to be truthful, I havn't flown on the A345's yet, but then again, those are still Trents on those as well.

User currently offlineLooneyToon From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 444 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 6606 times:

I have flown the 764 before from IAH to GRU and it was a very pleasant flight. Cabin noise was low, and IFE was pretty good too. I really dig the 777-like interior of the 764.


LooneyToon
User currently offlineCarpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2979 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 6494 times:

Please explain to CX why it uses its A330 on fairly short-hauls within Asia. Those A330 frequently turnaround in about an hour.

For Asiana, they already operate A321s so stepping up to the A333 is not a big deal.

BR has yet to replace the 767 with the A332. All have been used for expansion and replacement of pax MD-11s.

As other people mentioned cargo as a big factor, the 767 is an older design and perhaps airlines went for a newer design in the A330. Still I would have thought there would be a few more operators for the 764 by now.
Similar to the 753, it might have been just a timing thing. Wrong product at the wrong time.


User currently offlineAlexchao From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 688 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 6475 times:

Quoting Carpethead (Reply 11):
BR has yet to replace the 767 with the A332. All have been used for expansion and replacement of pax MD-11s.

The A330-200s have begun to replace the B767s in EVA Air's fleet. A B767-200 (B-16622) is scheduled to leave EVA in late April.

Scheduled Retirement for EVA Air's B767s:
April 2005
B-16622 (762)
N602EV (763ER)

May 2005
B-16625 (762)
N601EV (763ER)

July 2005
B-16621 (762)

November 2005
B-16623 (762)

June 2006
B-16603 (763ER)
B-16605 (763ER)

This might have changed since my info may be outdated.


User currently offline9V-SVC From Singapore, joined Oct 2001, 1797 posts, RR: 10
Reply 13, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 6463 times:

I remembered the 764ER had a world tour , went to many places but failed to get any orders apart from CO and DL. Mostly because of the cargo capacity and the range of the aircraft.


Airliners is the wings of my life.
User currently offline6thfreedom From Bermuda, joined Sep 2004, 3339 posts, RR: 20
Reply 14, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 6374 times:

Quoting Avek00 (Reply 3):
The A330 has proven itself to be an absolute dog on high-frequency short-haul missions - to QF's and MH's chagrin, the 330 simply was not built for runs like SYD-MEL and SIN-KUL.

Can you please explain this in a little more detail. I'm being dead serious, not sarcastic in any way.

QF operates mostly B763 SYD-MEL vv. What's the main difference with the A330? What are the issues?


User currently offlineN77014 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 6359 times:

I think a more relevant issue is the operating costs vs. capacity issues, particularly over the North Atlantic.

SAS in particular, is hurting as they find their A330's ill suited for thinner routes.

Keeping their older B767's while an expense for keeping an additonal fleet type, is not a bad option for substituting for the larger A330's on thin or off-season routes and markets.


User currently offlineBAW716 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 2028 posts, RR: 27
Reply 16, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 6286 times:

The problem with the 767-400 is the same problem with the -300. It cannot hold LD3 cans, nor can it take full size pallets. The A330 can take LD3 cans and full size pallets, so from a cargo perspective, there is a significant advantage on the A330 v. the B767-400.

The B767-400 was made for a specific mission: High density, medium range routes for which cargo is not a major component in the revenue mix for the aircraft. Delta, for example, uses the 767-400 as the replacement for the L1011. It does this very well. Continental, on the other hand, does use their -400 on long haul, but on secondary routes that are already served by a 777. Continental uses them to South America and occasionally to Europe. They use their -200s for the long haul low density routes where cargo and low density dictate the aircraft to be utilized.

In terms of passenger comfort, one can argue that the A330 is wider, therefore more spacious. Of course, the 767 advocates use the fact that there is only one middle seat, so 87% of the seats are windows and aisles and the pitch is usually between 32-33 inches)

Is there one that is better? No. They just are better on different misssion types.

baw716



David L. Lamb, fmr Area Mgr Alitalia SFO 1998-2002, fmr Regional Analyst SFO-UAL 1992-1998
User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 28
Reply 17, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 6238 times:

Quoting Carpethead (Reply 11):
BR has yet to replace the 767 with the A332. All have been used for expansion and replacement of pax MD-11s.

Yeah spot on from what I heard... fleet plans suggested the MD-11's would all be cargo converted (ideal for the MD-11) and then A332's would take the pax routes which the MD-11's used to fly.

Quoting Indy (Reply 2):
As a passenger I like the A330-300 better.



Quoting Flight152 (Reply 4):
Uhh. Care to explain why?

Noise level on the A332/3 is alot better IMO than that 763... I've done MEL-SYD and reverse a few times on both aircraft and its alot different. But then again alot of the actual comfort settings inside the cabin are purely to do with the airline, but the noise is a big factor for me.

Quoting 9V-SVC (Reply 13):
I remembered the 764ER had a world tour , went to many places but failed to get any orders apart from CO and DL. Mostly because of the cargo capacity and the range of the aircraft.

What is the range incidently?

Quoting 6thfreedom (Reply 14):
QF operates mostly B763 SYD-MEL vv. What's the main difference with the A330? What are the issues?

The A332 takes alot longer to turn around. It is a much bigger aircraft and takes alot longer to service once it has landed. Its ideal mission is not the short haul kind of stuff that QF have it doing.

Quoting BAW716 (Reply 16):
The problem with the 767-400 is the same problem with the -300. It cannot hold LD3 cans, nor can it take full size pallets. The A330 can take LD3 cans and full size pallets, so from a cargo perspective, there is a significant advantage on the A330 v. the B767-400.

Agreed... Cargo is the big issue here as it is worth alot of money to airlines because it is pure profit (cream on the cake if you will). The more cargo you can squeeze in on top of baggage and pax, the more money you will make.



It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 59
Reply 18, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 6206 times:

Quoting Avek00 (Reply 3):
3. The A330 has proven itself to be an absolute dog on high-frequency short-haul missions

EK uses it effectively in their DXB-KHI/LHE/ISB routes...I've been on them a few times..I don't mind their -A332's for short routes, but I don't like their A333's for their medium haul routes such as DXB-CDG....



"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 28
Reply 19, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 6186 times:

Quoting Jacobin777 (Reply 18):
but I don't like their A333's for their medium haul routes such as DXB-CDG....

Hmmm, not sure that EK operate A333's... in fact their website says they don't. Are you sure it wasn't one of the A332's?



It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
User currently offlineCarpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2979 posts, RR: 3
Reply 20, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 6112 times:

Alexchao,
Thanks for info on BR's 767 fleet. I guess it's safe to say they won't be painted in their new colors.
Any takers for the ex-BR planes. Surely, AC is looking at the 763ERs.

BR is retiring all eight 767s in about one year period. I believe BR doesn't have that many A332s left to be delivered. BR is taking some 773ER starting this year but these are part of replacement for 744 combis that will be converted to freighters. Could we see an add on to the A332 order? Another scenario is the displacement of some of MD-90s off domestic routes as result of the start of the high-speed rail link between Taipei and Kaohsiung. These could be used to replace the 767, while not matching the capacity, with increased frequencies.


User currently offlineVHXLR8 From Australia, joined Feb 2005, 500 posts, RR: 3
Reply 21, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6020 times:

Quoting Indy (Reply 2):
As a passenger I like the A330-300 better. I would pick it over the 767 any day. Just my opinion. Cargo from what I have been told in the past is the big deal. So that would be a big plus. A nicer interior is just icing on the cake.

If a nicer interior is what you're after, then you should choose your flights based on airline, not on aircraft type; as it is the airline that determines the cabin interiors, not the manufacturer


User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 28
Reply 22, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 5969 times:

Quoting Carpethead (Reply 20):
Thanks for info on BR's 767 fleet. I guess it's safe to say they won't be painted in their new colors.
Any takers for the ex-BR planes. Surely, AC is looking at the 763ERs.

Not when they're looking at replacements for those 763ER's... some will tell you they have already got a deal with Boeing for the 787 but we'll wait and see... shouldn't be too long.

Quoting Carpethead (Reply 20):
BR is retiring all eight 767s in about one year period. I believe BR doesn't have that many A332s left to be delivered. BR is taking some 773ER starting this year but these are part of replacement for 744 combis that will be converted to freighters. Could we see an add on to the A332 order? Another scenario is the displacement of some of MD-90s off domestic routes as result of the start of the high-speed rail link between Taipei and Kaohsiung. These could be used to replace the 767, while not matching the capacity, with increased frequencies.

BR doesn't operate domestically... The Kaohsiung routes are operated by UNI air so the MD-90's are probably at their disposal and not at BR's. I guess whats left of the A332's and the 777's will take over whatever void is left by the 767's but I doubt that its going to be that bigger hole that needs to be filled.



It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
User currently offlineStar_world From Ireland, joined Jun 2001, 1234 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 5865 times:

Quoting VHXLR8 (Reply 21):
If a nicer interior is what you're after, then you should choose your flights based on airline, not on aircraft type; as it is the airline that determines the cabin interiors, not the manufacturer

While this is true in some cases, it's safe to say that the majority of A330s have a "nicer" configuration than most 767s, simply because of the age of the aircraft and the options available for interior cabin fittings. Of course people will come back with comments about the 764 with the 777-style interior as already mentioned above, but the fact is that these aircraft are few and far between, and non-existant if you're not in the US!

So yes, it is definitely down to the operators in theory, but the average standard of A330 interiors is much more modern than 763s.


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 24, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 5848 times:

Quoting Asianguy767 (Thread starter):
s it a range issue or a timing thing?

Range is a large part of it, but range vs. uplift is the real thing. The A330-200 has a significantly greater uplift than the similar capacity 767.

Quoting Avek00 (Reply 3):
The A330 has proven itself to be an absolute dog on high-frequency short-haul missions - to QF's and MH's chagrin, the 330 simply was not built for runs like SYD-MEL and SIN-KUL.

It wasn't... but a lot of it is just QF and MH. CX and EK manage to op the plane just fine on short routes, although SYD-MEL is a very short route. Its a big plane, significantly bigger than a 767. It takes time to turn.

If SQ, CX, and all the other Asian carriers can manage to effectively fly the 777A as a regional plane, then QF should be able to get better results from their A330s.

Quoting Jacobin777 (Reply 18):
I don't mind their -A332's for short routes, but I don't like their A333's for their medium haul routes such as DXB-CDG....

EK operates no A330-300s at this time.


25 Avek00 : Short routes aren't the problem - high-frequency short-haul routes such as SIN-KUL and SYD-MEL are where the 333 is a dog - the planes go mechancial
26 DLPMMM : I have seen this sort of statement several times on different threads. I am not doubting anyone's veracity, but was wondering if there is any authori
27 N1120A : Range and cargo That has nothing to do with the A330, rather the airline (I assume this is US and yes, that IFE is excellent) Lots of electrical prob
28 Cleared2Land4 : Im with him the 330s are also cleaner and newer
29 Texaslonghorn : The A330s may be newer and quieter inside, but the 767's 2-3-2 seating arrangement is money. This makes it feel so much less cramped than the 330's ca
30 Tjcab : Definitely prfer the 330 over classic 767's, however, all late model 767's have the 777-style interiors. Flew to IAH-LAX on CO's 764, one of the most
31 N1120A : That depends completely upon the carrier. It really depends on who is flying the plane
32 Gigneil : Relatively short hauls are still hauls in the 4000nm range, which is the target sweet spot for the 330 as well. Boeing built the plane to replace DC-
33 Post contains images TeamREGAL : The A332 is smaller than the MD-11, so wouldn't that leave a serious gap in passenger load? Wouldn't you need at least need the A333X for an MD-11 mi
34 Baw716 : Just my two cents: My personal preference: B767 for passenger comfort, A330 for cargo. I have flown more than 500,000 miles in the 767 transatlantic,
35 Post contains images TeamREGAL : To add on to what N1120A said, the passenger loads in the Asian short-haul/domestic market are dense. So not only are SQ and CX planes full, their pl
36 Gigneil : I contend that the 777A was not designed for a short haul or domestic mission any more than the A330 was. Obviously, QF's short hauls are just as dens
37 TeamREGAL : That's the part I didn't know. So, we're back to square one...Why is QF having such a hard time? REGAL
38 YUL332LX : It depends on carriers, but generally speaking, margins are MUCH higher for cargo than they are for pax.
39 N1120A : Except that 772As most often do runs like LAX-HNL (just over 2000nm), LAX-ORD/DEN (under 1000-1500nm) and the like
40 Monteycarlos : The BR A332's have 252 seats, the MD-11's were 280 by memory... so 30 odd seats down. I'd hazard a guess that the routes where the MD-11 was filling
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Did Aeroflot Replace The IL96 To Lax? posted Wed Dec 22 1999 01:01:52 by WinAir
Boeing To Replace The 737 With Two Models? posted Tue Aug 15 2006 21:45:28 by Tangowhisky
How To Make The B767-400ER More Attractive? posted Sat Jun 26 2004 20:04:53 by Asianguy767
Virgin Atlantic-Why Back To Flying The A340 To SFO posted Mon Nov 10 2003 01:41:11 by AS739X
NWA A330 To SEA, The First Ever? posted Sun Jul 20 2003 04:16:11 by Clickhappy
NW Is In No Hurry To Replace The DC-9 posted Sat Nov 16 2002 01:38:10 by Rjx
A Personal Plane For All To Replace The Auto? posted Fri Jun 21 2002 07:48:37 by Zanadou
ANA To Replace The A321? posted Fri May 10 2002 20:21:33 by Godbless
What's Going To Replace The 727? posted Sat Aug 4 2001 22:05:31 by Tbone202
The Race To Replace The MD11 posted Fri Feb 4 2000 06:54:54 by VH-BZF