Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Shuttle America To Fly 170/190Drop All Prop Flying  
User currently offlineUnitedTristar From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (9 years 4 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3912 times:

http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/050421/216128.html?.v=1

Interesting article....

Here is part of it

"Republic's decision to purchase Shuttle America is in anticipation of increased demand for the Embraer 170 and to provide Republic with the opportunity to operate aircraft larger than 70 seats such as the Embraer 190 while complying with certain scope restrictions that some of its major airline partners currently have in place. Republic intends to add the Embraer 170 to the Shuttle America operation as soon as possible and plans to phase out all turboprop flying by the end of 2005."

Very interesting...Wonder who is going to pick up the prop flying for UA out of IAD? Maybe OO?

-m

 airplane 

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFriendlySkies From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 4105 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (9 years 4 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3852 times:

Well, thank god that lousy excuse of an airline might actually get some improved service. That's if it's anything close to Chautauqua, and being owned by the same company, one can assume it will be. Does this mean we could see some E190s flying for UAX? It would make sense to replace the 146, and I've heard it might even be able to fly into Aspen?

As for prop flying...IF it's replaced, it would almost have to be Mesa or Skywest.


User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7553 posts, RR: 28
Reply 2, posted (9 years 4 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3805 times:

This is just getting rediculous.....United has the most messed up regional system of anyone, and it just keeps getting wilder.

Its really a wild-card whether United will replace prop feed or just go with RJ's out of IAD. Can United economically fly RJ's on routes like CRW, SCE, ABE, BGM, CHO, AVP, ROA, TYS, DAY and still maintain the frequency that they do? I would venture to say no in many of these cities.

I could possibly see someone like Colgan coming in and picking up some prop flying out of IAD, unless Mesa is going to move some Dash-8's to the East Coast.


User currently offlineFriendlySkies From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 4105 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (9 years 4 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3785 times:

Well, to be fair, this move actually simplifies UA's express operation by consolidating two carriers into one, all flying a standard aircraft (E170/190).

I can see YV coming in with Dash 8s, they seem to be working ok in DEN. But IAD could go all RJ as well...I guess we'll see what happens.


User currently offlineA330323X From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 3039 posts, RR: 44
Reply 4, posted (9 years 4 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3770 times:

This has been rumored for the last month or two, because Republic couldn't get a certificate for the 170/190 flying, and it needed to get the planes off the Chautauqua certificate because of the penalties it is paying AA.


I'm the expert on here on two things, neither of which I care about much anymore.
User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7553 posts, RR: 28
Reply 5, posted (9 years 4 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3751 times:

Why couldn't Republic get the certificate?
I knew there were problems with CHQ and the whole scope clause relating to AA pilots under the American Connection deal.

There were rumors circulating that the Saab flying could transition over to the CHQ certificate since it doesn't violate any scope restrictions, but you never know.

[Edited 2005-04-22 03:42:26]

User currently offlineA330323X From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 3039 posts, RR: 44
Reply 6, posted (9 years 4 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3730 times:

Why couldn't Republic get the certificate?

I have no idea what the problems were, I just know they were having an extremely difficult time with it. You wouldn't expect it to be that big of a deal, since other airlines have done it, recently including Mesa/Freedom and Piedmont/Potomac. If I had to guess, I'd say that Republic went into the process expecting for the application to be rubber-stamped, and the FAA didn't take to kindly to that--again, that's just a guess as to what the problem might have been.

It'll be interesting to see if Trans States and GoJet have the same problem.



I'm the expert on here on two things, neither of which I care about much anymore.
User currently offlineCactus739 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2444 posts, RR: 31
Reply 7, posted (9 years 4 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 3526 times:

So Republic Airways Holdings would be operating 3 airlines, or would they merge Shuttle America into one of the others?


You can't fix stupid.... - Ron White
User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7553 posts, RR: 28
Reply 8, posted (9 years 4 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3344 times:

Its kind of convoluted.....

Republic Airways Holdings was formed as a parent company to maintain different subsidaries in order to get around scope clause rules at different airlines.

Chautauqua flies as American Connection, Delta Connection, USAirways Express, and United Express with a fleet of ERJ-135, 140, and 145

Shuttle America flies a fleet of Saabs as United Express out of IAD.

Republic Airlines was set up to operate E-170's for United Express and Delta Connection. The only reason for this was that AA pilot's scope clause does not allow any carrier to operate 70 seaters except for the 25 CR7's flown by Eagle that are exempt. However, Republic needed to obtain an operating certificate which it expected to have by June 2005. It has obviously failed at its efforts, and obtaining a certificate is a lengthy process.

CHQ has been operating the E-170's for UAX on its certificate for a while now. Because of this, they have paid AA approximately $500,000 since the E-170's went in service back in 2004. Beginning 4/21/05 (yesterday) CHQ must pay AA $36,000 per day that the E-170's operate under CHQ. Thus you can obviously see why they want to get the E-170's off the CHQ certificate ASAP. They won't likely get moved over to the Shuttle America certificate until the fall time frame.


User currently offlineKcrwFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2004, 3805 posts, RR: 7
Reply 9, posted (9 years 4 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 3145 times:

Quoting SCE" class=quote target=_blank>PSU.DTW.SCE (Reply 2):
Its really a wild-card whether United will replace prop feed or just go with RJ's out of IAD. Can United economically fly RJ's on routes like CRW, SCE, ABE, BGM, CHO, AVP, ROA, TYS, DAY and still maintain the frequency that they do? I would venture to say no in many of these cities.

as far as i know the 3x saab to IAD does great. mostly connecting of course. they could definately use a 50 seater. i think a 70 seater may be too much.


User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26426 posts, RR: 76
Reply 10, posted (9 years 4 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 3107 times:

Quoting FriendlySkies (Reply 3):
I can see YV coming in with Dash 8s, they seem to be working ok in DEN.

That would not be a good thing. OO could hold off on the 5 or so Brasilias they are planning on cutting and move some of them to IAD, especially since they are no longer doing COconnection flying



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7553 posts, RR: 28
Reply 11, posted (9 years 4 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3079 times:

Brasilla's at IAD seem like a disaster in the making. The need more capacity there than at 29 seater and something that isn't gonna get severely weight restricted in the summer.

User currently offlineScottB From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 6743 posts, RR: 32
Reply 12, posted (9 years 4 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3005 times:

Quoting A330323X (Reply 6):
You wouldn't expect it to be that big of a deal, since other airlines have done it, recently including Mesa/Freedom and Piedmont/Potomac.

Actually, Potomac was using an existing certificate as I recall; Paradise Island Airways' if I'm not mistaken.

Quoting PSU.DTW.SCE (Reply 11):
Brasilla's at IAD seem like a disaster in the making. The need more capacity there than at 29 seater

I can't see how much worse the E120 would do at IAD in the summer than it would at either SLC (4200') or DEN (5300') -- or even IAH where CO Express and more recently CO Connection used them. IAH easily trumps IAD for heat and humidity.


User currently offlineSyncmaster From United States of America, joined Jul 2002, 2027 posts, RR: 10
Reply 13, posted (9 years 4 months 21 hours ago) and read 2760 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Seems like good news for Shuttle. But does anyone know what this will do to their operations at FWA?

-Charlie


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Shuttle America To Restart Routes posted Wed Sep 5 2001 15:03:05 by Gsoflyer
For All You "I Want Jetblue To Fly Here" A.netters posted Wed Apr 26 2006 03:48:29 by Garri767
Shuttle America EMB 170 posted Thu Apr 13 2006 01:27:00 by Remymartin11
EVA To Use B773ERs On All North America Routes posted Wed Feb 15 2006 15:39:39 by Wolfy
Flying From North America To Northeastern Brazil posted Tue Jan 17 2006 23:34:57 by Hagic
DL & Shuttle America Apply For EMB-170 SLC-MZT Svc posted Wed Jun 29 2005 00:17:59 by Jkudall
Was OA The First Airline To Fly All 5 Continents? posted Fri Feb 25 2005 03:45:52 by SXFAN
Why DL Shuttle 738 To PHX All "Y"? posted Thu Feb 17 2005 00:48:58 by AV8AJET
VH To Fly To MIA In All-business Class Config posted Wed Nov 3 2004 08:25:01 by MAH4546
Best Way To FLY On An ERJ-170?! posted Sun Oct 24 2004 23:31:43 by Jkw777