Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Airbus' Next Step  
User currently offlineMoose1226 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 250 posts, RR: 1
Posted (9 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 2275 times:

After the two big Boeing wins this week (AC and AI), what should Airbus do next to counter the Boeing momentum...

Your thoughts please...

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLeelaw From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (9 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2258 times:

Significantly drop the price of the A350.

User currently offlineMham001 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3567 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (9 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2246 times:

Quoting Leelaw (Reply 1):
Significantly drop the price of the A350.

What is their asking price?


User currently onlineNYC777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 5731 posts, RR: 48
Reply 3, posted (9 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2168 times:

How about drop the A350.


That which does not kill me makes me stronger.
User currently offlineAirFrnt From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 2824 posts, RR: 42
Reply 4, posted (9 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2160 times:

Airbus needs to push for stronger regulation in Japan, America, UK and China. The slots in and out of large airports need to allow less planes so they can sell more A380s.

They need to come up with a good replacement for the 767/300. That involves developing the knowledge needed to actually use large percentage composite bodies. Either that or steal the knowledge from someone via a merger.

They need to plan for the first wave of retiring A320 and the after wave of 737NG replacements. They have to solve the fan space issue on engines.

And they have to do all this without taking a dime from the EU and sparking a trade war with the United States.


User currently offlineLeelaw From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2103 times:

Quoting AirFrnt (Reply 5):
Airbus needs to push for stronger regulation in Japan, America, UK and China. The slots in and out of large airports need to allow less planes so they can sell more A380s.

That could be a double-edged sword. Wouldn't this negatively impact sales of smaller aircraft as well?


User currently offlineMark_D. From Canada, joined Aug 2001, 1447 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (9 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1990 times:

AirFrnt--That involves developing the knowledge needed to actually use large percentage composite bodies.

They have basically as much knowledge with that as anybody (yes anybody, and in particular a certain company you may be familiar with  spin  ). Whether you want to admit as much or not is your business!


(hint: how does anyone know whether the 787 fuselage can be manufactured in a cost-effective and repeatable way yet?

Answer: they don't, of course! Still, sporting of the Boeing (and subcontractor) design guys to not roll over but instead give it the ol' college try in a big way, especially while the company's back was up against a wall in the global marketplace)

And they have to do all this without taking a dime from the EU and sparking a trade war with the United States.

The very last thing the U.S. of A. economy needs right now is a trade war, with anybody! And with today's h-u-g-e A380 debut -- they basically were the lead story Planet-wide today, like the World Cup final or Olympics or something-- enormous numbers of the Airbus Corps in a matter of just a few short hours became way freer to work on giving the consortium's commercial midrange and narrowbody lineup a bright long-term future in their own right.


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31667 posts, RR: 56
Reply 7, posted (9 years 2 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1804 times:

Improve Marketting.
Out here....Lobby for the IC deal.
regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineFriendlySkies From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 4105 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (9 years 2 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1801 times:

Easy. They should stop bitching about every lost order and focus on the next one!

User currently offlineGrantcv From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 430 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (9 years 2 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1792 times:

Actually, if I were Airbus, I would focus on an updated A320. That plane is ready for a 2nd generation while Boeing's model in that space - the 3rd generation 737 is starting to age badly. Boeing needs to build an all new plane now while Airbus can get away with an update. By committing to a NG A320, Airbus can take the wind out of the 737 sales, forcing Boeing to spend big bucks on another new model. I think Boeing would rather wait till the 787 is further. Forcing them to do both designs in parallel would be more difficult and costly for Boeing.

User currently offlineFriendlySkies From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 4105 posts, RR: 5
Reply 10, posted (9 years 2 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1785 times:

Quoting Grantcv (Reply 9):
Actually, if I were Airbus, I would focus on an updated A320. That plane is ready for a 2nd generation while Boeing's model in that space - the 3rd generation 737 is starting to age badly. Boeing needs to build an all new plane now while Airbus can get away with an update. By committing to a NG A320, Airbus can take the wind out of the 737 sales, forcing Boeing to spend big bucks on another new model. I think Boeing would rather wait till the 787 is further. Forcing them to do both designs in parallel would be more difficult and costly for Boeing.

True, but in the end Boeing would have the last laugh. Why? Airbus would have an updated A320, while Boeing would have a brand-new airplane. It's basically the 787/A350 only reversed, with Boeing still coming out on top.

Frankly, Boeing would LOVE it if Airbus annouced an updated A320 rather than a new design.


User currently offlineRsmith6621a From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 194 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (9 years 2 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1761 times:

FreindlySkies said.....True, but in the end Boeing would have the last laugh. Why? Airbus would have an updated A320, while Boeing would have a brand-new airplane.

The A-319-20-21 are wonderful aicraft the only drawback is that they were not designed for longterm service, I have heard that 20 years of service is the MAX. The A-320 are far more comfortable than the NGs.. I dont think that Airbus would attempt to just do an updated version of the 320 series that is unless the airlines were not happy with the performance of the present airframe along with effeciency as well as wheather an update would be profitable.



Did You Ever Think Freedom Could Be this Bad
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
The Next Step Beyond Cfrp - Nanotubes? posted Thu Nov 16 2006 21:30:09 by N328KF
Next Step After PPL-A, PPL-H Or IR? posted Sat May 6 2006 09:55:23 by Salim
What Would Be The Logical Next Step For Allegiant posted Sun Nov 13 2005 15:26:06 by Vfw614
Whats The Next Step For Aer Lingus? posted Tue Aug 30 2005 00:31:53 by EI321
A Dogfight Over Airbus' Next Pilot (Business Week) posted Thu Feb 10 2005 08:32:06 by Jacobin777
After A380 Ceremony...What's The Next Step? posted Wed Jan 19 2005 14:55:47 by MEA321
Airbus' Next Project? posted Wed Jan 2 2002 18:25:25 by RayChuang
Airbus' Next Airplane NOT Counting A380 posted Fri Dec 14 2001 23:26:25 by Rj777
CX's Next Step...?!?!?! posted Thu Aug 23 2001 10:41:01 by Wolfy
Next Step Of AA To Europe posted Fri Apr 27 2001 20:23:01 by Flying lsd