Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
L-1011 Lovers - Please Read!  
User currently offlineHamlet69 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 2703 posts, RR: 58
Posted (14 years 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 1350 times:

Dear Members,
I know there is a huge following out there who are in love with the L-1011. I've heard it referred to as 'ahead of its time' and 'more advanced than the competition.' I myself have no knowledge of this plane, other than I think it is the second best-looking airliner of all time (behind the 777). What made it so advanced for its day? Any info would be appreciated, as I have no technical knowledge of this aircraft.

Thanks

Hamlet69


Honor the warriors, not the war.
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTWA717_200 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (14 years 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1161 times:

What made it so advance was its autopilot capabilities. It was (is) capable of making auto landings in Cat 3B conditions. Also, it used 4 independant hydraulic systems compared to many of the competitors 3.

User currently offlineDL_mech From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 1908 posts, RR: 9
Reply 2, posted (14 years 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1139 times:

Along with the autopilot, the TriStar also had a flying horizontal stabilizer which took the place of the standard elevator/movable stabilizer setup. The plane used a system called Direct Lift Control (DLC) during landing. DLC allowed the airplane to maintain a constant pitch angle during approach and used the spoilers to control the aircraft on the glidepath. TriStar 500s have an active control system (ACS) for the outboard ailerons which allowed the wing to be lengthened without any beef-up of wing structure. ACS would deflect the ailerons to counteract any wind gusts or undesireable loading on the wing. These features make the L-1011 the smoothest riding jetliner in the sky.


It's not going to the Moon.....It's just going to California
User currently offlineHmmmm... From Canada, joined May 1999, 2104 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (14 years 1 week 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1132 times:

Check out these websites for all your L-1011 research needs.

L-1011 link page.

Hmmmm...



An optimist robs himself of the joy of being pleasantly surprised
User currently offlineTEDSKI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (14 years 1 week 6 days ago) and read 1077 times:

It is too bad that Lockheed in the late 70s couldn't have developed an advanced version of the L-1011 with engines from P&W and GE instead of just Rolls Royce and with a FBW system.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Boyd: Airline Ch. 11's Myth Vs. Fact -Please Read! posted Mon Sep 19 2005 23:03:39 by PSU.DTW.SCE
UA Employees Please Read posted Fri Jan 18 2002 08:14:20 by UAL Bagsmasher
Picture Missing...Admin Please Read. posted Mon Dec 31 2001 20:14:10 by Hustler
Defunct Airlines, Please Read! posted Wed Mar 28 2001 22:19:08 by AirOne
Continental Airlines Pilots . . . Please Read posted Mon Feb 26 2001 03:29:30 by NWA DC-10
All Pilots Please Read posted Thu Feb 15 2001 22:25:17 by Deltadude8
Pilot Schedule - Pilots Please Read. posted Sun Oct 22 2000 20:49:58 by Shawn Patrick
All Members Please Read This Very Important! posted Thu Jun 1 2000 21:44:49 by CX747
CO 777 Question-CALpilot, Please Read! posted Mon May 29 2000 17:11:31 by Ishky15
Interesting Info; Please Read posted Sun Apr 30 2000 19:09:26 by SWA737-500